Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 60

Thread: Passenger Car Safety Cells

  1. #31
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in the wild New England, NSW
    Posts
    4,918
    Total Downloaded
    0
    there is a search facility


    Passenger Car Safety Cells

  2. #32
    It'sNotWorthComplaining! Guest
    pathetic that some out there still believe "We are here for a good time not a long time".


    I am beyond sympathy, we get told over and over don't speed. don't drink, don't text etc etc, but they laugh and say it won't happen to them, you have better odds dying in a crash than winning the lottery, sooner of later their numbers come up, you just have to play the game of cheat death once too often.
    What do have to do, take every new young driver who passes the driving test , to the morgue and pull out a few gadivas from road trauma and make them look before they are allowed to drive?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by It'sNotWorthComplaining! View Post
    What do have to do, take every new young driver who passes the driving test , to the morge and pull out a few gadivas from road trauma and make them look before they are allowed to drive?
    Apparently that does not work for the reason that you mentioned yourself. People are able to convince themselves that it won't happen to them.

    EDIT: I don't think it works with cadavers from a morgue either.

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by It'sNotWorthComplaining! View Post
    pathetic that some out there still believe "We are here for a good time not a long time".


    I am beyond sympathy, we get told over and over don't speed. don't drink, don't text etc etc, but they laugh and say it won't happen to them, you have better odds dying in a crash than winning the lottery, sooner of later their numbers come up, you just have to play the game of cheat death once too often.
    What do have to do, take every new young driver who passes the driving test , to the morge and pull out a few gadivas from road trauma and make them look before they are allowed to drive?
    And that would not have slowed me down one bit.

    (and been in the hospital morgue, etc)

    I was arrogant enough to know it wouldn't happen to me.
    Luckily, it didn't. (and I only had a crotchety old ute that would top out at 135km/h, maybe 140 down a hill with a tail wind, but I'd had it sideways many, many times on dry bitumen at 130+.)

    The ultimate top speed of the vehicle doesn't really matter.






    What is needed is that kids need to be taught how to drive, not just pass a license test.

    They need to know what a car will do in any given situation, wet, dry, constant radius and closing radius, off camber and dirt corners.

    They need to be schooled at a driver training facility and shown that they aren't as good as they think they are, shown what a car will do and how to save it.

    You won't stop them speeding, but you may just save quite a few lives. (although I doubt that in this case)

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    put the speed cameras on top of manned armoured vehicles with live ammo...

    since your going to speed and endanger yourself and everyone else anyway I dont see a problem with giving darwin a little helping hand.

    or instate power to weight ratios based on drivers capablility
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Poland (I kid you not)
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is research that suggests the younger mind (25 and less) is incapable of realising the real dangers associated with their actions. Sadly, nNo level of communication or restriction will stop this from happening.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Heart in the Deep Nth of FNQ,Body in the Deep Nth of Brisneyland
    Posts
    1,623
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Poleonpom, Yes there is an answer.
    As Dave suggests, a more 'Draconian', staged limitation on p/w of the vehicles. Perhaps an additional L plate as the P's are .
    L1= Basic Gumby limited to 80k/h & say 60kW/ tonne. Until passed what is currently the P plate test.
    L2= 90k/h 75kW/t until current test + emergency avoidance/ stopping+ various surfaces.
    As a Parent with a child transitioning on to Ps, I would be happy to pay $150 for a longer, more involved exam. His training consists of various vehicles, on/off road driving, mud, clay, gravel, freeway, done def driving skid pan work. He's had his learners for longer than his mates, but is a much better driver because of it.
    Dave.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    sad indeed....however i'm sure there are plenty of us on the forum that did similar things when they were young and got away with it.........

    i remember reguarly doing 200km/hr in my HQ ute down appy straight when i was 17/18, why? because it was the done thing with my peers another example was the back road to wodonga, it claimed its far share of apprentices which we knew about and my employer even went to the trouble of placing a smash up car at the exit gate with a sign saying speeding kills but some still tried to beat the record, i would only have a half arsed go because i knew i didn't have the skills or the car

    would i do it now....no way
    why did i do it than......who knows, peer group pressure maybe
    would i condone my boys doing it when they arrive at age 17....no way
    was i lucky......you betcha

    clowns? for all we know these kids could have been a couple of good kids that made a wrong decision at the time

  9. #39
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,709
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
    Is the half car the result of hitting the tree, or was it cut up by the road crash rescuers?

    It looks way too straight to have been done by something as blunt as a tree!

    Tony
    The rest of the car is burned - so I assume it came off in the crash.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Qld
    Posts
    806
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SuperMono View Post
    Any impact with a significant fixed object at much above running pace is likely to result in injury of some sort.
    At 60kph hitting something big and virtually immovable is likely to cause death even in some of the safest of vehicles.

    "Running head-on into a tree at 80 km/h is unsurvivable with current technology"
    And yet the last crash I had was approximately 65-70km/h but was not by any means "current technology" (87 model SAAB 900 2 door, they look like a cockroach and apparently can survive like one too) - no safety cells, no airbags, no seatbelt pretensioners and no crumple zones. Head on into a tree (it jumped out in front of me at the last minute), car was very minimally damaged in the scheme of things for a crash into a very rigid tree (bonnet, bumper and RHS guard creased, grille cracked, drivers door unable to open, radiator pushed back into gearbox and punctured, gearbox unable to be moved out of gear, cracked rigid injector line and one indicator/park light cracked. Plus one of the little wheel centre caps popped off and rolled away never to be seen again) Engine still ran on 3 cylinders and was still driveable albeit on one gear only. I was completely uninjured, not even a bruise, seatbelt did its job perfectly and a tonne of steel absorbed the impact as it was obviously designed to do. Written off as parts alone were 3x the insured value but the point of the story is that the speed and the object you hit plays little bearing, it is a combination of vehicle, hitting angle, and probably pure dumb luck.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!