Thread: Any one good in chemistry?

How I see it is that in the first instance Dave (Blknight) is right. And there is no doubt that injection of the gas mixture into an appropriately tuned engine will increase the power output. However, it would take more energy (power if you like) to generate the gas mixture than is gained by recombining the gases (combusting it if you like) back to water. Otherwise you have the basis for a perpetual motion machine.

Cheers
KarlB

ahhh perpetual motion.....if you combined all the gimmicks that propose to make your vehicle run faster, smoother, further,quieter, more efficient,better lubrication,etc you'd have a perpetual motion machine. Hmmmm what would YOU fit first? a hi-clone maybe?

Originally Posted by KarlB

Otherwise you have the basis for a perpetual motion machine.

From the FAQ

Will my HHO cell use much Water?

The cells use very little, in fact you could drive many weeks without having to add more. To make the cell perform at it highest level it is important to remember that as the water evaporates the electrolyte becomes stronger which effects HHO production, so we suggest you always top up with distilled water once every week or two to ensure the reservoir is always full. If you average of 3000 kilometres per month, you would use less than 3 litres of distilled in 6 months.

Maybe I'm missing something - where does all the hydrogen and oxygen come from?

how much water does this machine use/hold? a simple molar calculation should settle it once and for all

actually on second thought, stuff the moles, how do they suggest these atoms are bonded together?

The H and O gases come form water which is split apart using electricity, electricity created by the engine's alternator.

From what I've read, it's not meant to be a perpetual motion machine, it's not claiming that the energy you get from burning the H and O is greater than the energy it takes to split up the water. That would be too easy to debunk.

The claim is that by combining the H and O with the petrol/diesel, it makes the petrol/diesel burn more effectively, makes it more efficient. As was also posted here, water injection supposedly works in the same way.

I've never used either, and don't claim to know if injecting HHO in with the diesel or petrol makes the engine more efficient or not, nor whether the energy used to split the water is greater or less than the efficiencies gained.

Not sure about the intercooler bit. If it really is splittling H2O into H2 and O2 gases, cooling them in the intercooler isn't going to cause them to condense, it's still too warm. Perhaps the system just doesn't work on modern motors. Could be that it works on older, worn motors simply because it boosts the compression up a little or because any love and attention will get an improvement out of them.

Good old Wikipedia
"Proponents, who sell the units, claim that the dynamics are often misconstrued, and due to the chemical properties of the resulting mixture, it is possible to gain efficiency increases in a manner that does not violate any scientific laws. Recent tests by consumer watch groups have shown negative results."

References provided in the article: [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_fuel_enhancement"]Hydrogen fuel enhancement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame].

Originally Posted by Pinelli

............................... Perhaps the system just doesn't work on modern motors. Could be that it works on older, worn motors simply because it boosts the compression up a little or because any love and attention will get an improvement out of them.

NO! NO! NO!


Don't you get it ? It's complete bull****. A con job.

As for water injection. It's been around forever. World War 1 fighter pilots used it. Injecting water into a hot cylinder caused it to turn to steam and deliver more power than petrol for a short period of time (until the block cooled down). No technological marvel here just basic physics.

Deano