Page 46 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3644454647485696 ... LastLast
Results 451 to 460 of 1229

Thread: Cyclists.

  1. #451
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loneranger View Post
    Which is back to my orignal point. You have to apply resources to stopping and checking to determine if someone is required to have a license.
    Same goes for motorists. A resource stopped me and checked my license this afternoon.

    Quote Originally Posted by loneranger View Post
    I don't mind adding a cycling license to my driver's license and BWA member registration (which provides insurance cover) but whilst they're in my pocket it doesn't identify me unless you stop me and ask to see them.
    Likewise, I have a HV endorsement on my license which is in my pocket as I drive. Yep, it doesn't identify me unless I am stopped and asked to produce my license. What are you saying? We should do away with licenses and anyone can drive/ride any vehicle they want?

    Quote Originally Posted by loneranger View Post
    While you can then say that you can be identified by having your registration displayed on your helmet have a think about how easy it is going to be to have a 6 or 8 digit identification code displayed. Especially on a lightweight racing helmet. They'll be very small numbers or letters.
    You should see the size of the numbers and letters on my bike rack plate. They're small and yet identifiable.

    Quote Originally Posted by loneranger View Post
    As an aside, how many of the motorists on this forum who have expressed their displeasure at cyclists would seriously change their attitude if we were registered and willingly share the road with us?
    Speaking for myself. My attitude will not change as I will continue to treat them with the utmost respect as a fellow road user.
    What will make these cyclists respect the road rules and other road users?
    Accountability.

    Should a cyclist accrue enough points to have their car license canceled, they can still ride their bike. Should it mean they lose the privilege to cycle, that may make them think a little before they ride through that red light. It might even save their life.

  2. #452
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pocket Rocket View Post
    BTW been meaning to say this for a while - lycra is not a fashion statement. It's just something you wear coz you get fed up with getting a sore butt.

    When you first start riding you really don't want to wear it so you don't and then suffer for it. Then you go to the next step which is wearing shorts over the lycra so no-one can see you wearing it. Then you realise that it's just too hot and impractical so you concede and resign yourself to looking stupid every time you get on your bike.

    The shirts aren't lycra - they're that wicking material that most sports shirts are made out of. Lyrca shirts would be really uncomfortable. I don't think they make them anymore - never seen them in the shops. Most of them are bright so you can be seen and they have pockets to stash food etc.

    When we have 'ride to work breakfasts' at work the rule is no lycra allowed. Everyone's hits the showers and dresses in work clothes first before walking to the cafe.

    I really don't get where the 'fashion' myth comes into it. The only other time I go out looking that ridiculous is when I go kayak fishing because of all the sun protective gear - again not a fashion statement.

    I bought a sprung gell seat. Better than having to change when I want a coffee.

  3. #453
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bernd VonCrashen View Post
    What about better licensing for all road users, including a new license refresher course. I see to many people who have their license and drive 2wd, 4wd or 1wd and are unable to drive in a fashion to ensure the safety of others, consideration of others or even show ability using the road. Most are ignorant of even keeping up to date with changes in rules and situations (wet/dry). Motorists and cyclists need to accept both share the road. SHARE! Too many are unable to accept that.

    What about a pedestrian license? Seriously it is becoming like a debate about people who use umbrellas undercover during rain. Yeah they use it for being out there in the rain or just enjoying themselves, but do they need it under cover? Far beyond the point, but where do we stop. Are you really that special on the road or under cover? It rains! People use the road and or walk to traverse along with footpaths!

    Before we had cars we had horses and legs, times change, accept it? Well before that no umbrellas either?

    Planes had propellers, now they have jets, do pilots complain?
    I sense your sarcasm.
    Yes. If cyclists don't need licenses then anyone should be able to drive a triple road train through Sydney CBD without any formal training or knowledge of road rules.
    The vehicles don't need to be registered or have any form of insurance.
    Or so some will lead us to believe.

  4. #454
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    I bought a sprung gell seat. Better than having to change when I want a coffee.
    Mick are you saying you go for a ride and then stop for coffee? How 'cyclist' of you!

    FWIW I've never understood the cycling / coffee thing. I just ride to work.

  5. #455
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    1,423
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    Same goes for motorists. A resource stopped me and checked my license this afternoon.

    Likewise, I have a HV endorsement on my license which is in my pocket as I drive. Yep, it doesn't identify me unless I am stopped and asked to produce my license. What are you saying? We should do away with licenses and anyone can drive/ride any vehicle they want?

    You should see the size of the numbers and letters on my bike rack plate. They're small and yet identifiable.
    My point being that you don't need a license for the police to stop you on a bike. The police can stop you for breaking the law regardless of whether you are a pedestrian, cyclist or motorist. Having a license doesn't change that.

    The real issue I see with the argument that posters are making regarding licenses is that police are not enforcing the law. Cyclists don't need a license for the police to enforce the road laws and it goes against your driver's license if you get pinged on your bike anyway which for most cyclists would be a greater penalty than against a cycle license.

    In my view the argument about registering cyclists is just a smokescreen. Personally, in Perth I would be happy to see a police presence on the bike paths enforcing the law on some of the lunatics out there. If they want to setup at some of the intersections in Perth good on them but they'll be so busy writing tickets for all the jaywalkers they won't have time to bother about the odd cyclist.

  6. #456
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pocket Rocket View Post
    Mick are you saying you go for a ride and then stop for coffee? How 'cyclist' of you!

    FWIW I've never understood the cycling / coffee thing. I just ride to work.
    It's worse than that. I drive to the car park, cycle to the cafe, cycle to the car park, then drive home.
    A nice way to spend a Sunday morning.

  7. #457
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    1,423
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    I bought a sprung gell seat. Better than having to change when I want a coffee.
    Are you a coffee shop cyclist? The worst kind!!!

  8. #458
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    It's worse than that. I drive to the car park, cycle to the cafe, cycle to the car park, then drive home.
    A nice way to spend a Sunday morning.
    Bahahahahaha

    ROLFL

    On a serious note do you have a Defender? If so how do you carry your bike?

  9. #459
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    63
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Mick for pointing out my little sarcasm / not well brought up point ( I am not the best in discussion meets what I am trying to relay). We all need to be very wary of everyone and everything on the road. I left out the bigger vehicles for a point as not many have even looked at the issue of that or the size comparison between vehicles. They have a lot to deal with and it comes down to size and also maneuverability they are really in a bad position with respects to other road users. They have to deal with anything of a lesser size with them and yet many don't give them the respect they need on the road to control their vehicle while trying to avoid accidents or give them the room to move. Cyclists or even motor bike riders, as they are small and "can" be nimble are also not protected as the car is the like "bike" compared to a larger vehicle like a truck or bigger.

    Just like a truck or a car, regardless of size be very wary of whats on the road and respect other people out there. Some people are very good drivers/riders some are very bad drivers/riders Just wish everyone can be safe and give everyone respect to their abilities.

  10. #460
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loneranger View Post
    My point being that you don't need a license for the police to stop you on a bike. The police can stop you for breaking the law regardless of whether you are a pedestrian, cyclist or motorist. Having a license doesn't change that.

    The real issue I see with the argument that posters are making regarding licenses is that police are not enforcing the law. Cyclists don't need a license for the police to enforce the road laws and it goes against your driver's license if you get pinged on your bike anyway which for most cyclists would be a greater penalty than against a cycle license.
    And when they lose their license, they can still ride their bike.
    It's like a motorist still being able to drive with a canceled license.

Page 46 of 123 FirstFirst ... 3644454647485696 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!