Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Bow Fishing - Greens Object

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Annapolis, Maryland
    Posts
    41
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by POD View Post
    Pretty hard to confuse these with a platypus
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwMSy7xK218
    Hope you don't have those flying carp in Oz. That looks to be a a clip shot here.
    They are destroying inland fisheries here.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melrose Park NSW
    Posts
    1,559
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KarlB View Post
    Just to add some real meat to the discussion I have attached the Risk Assessment associated with the NSW bow-fishing proposal. That said, is is bleedingly obvious that such 'fishing' will have no significant impact on the distribution or abundance of European Carp in our natural waterways.

    Cheers
    KarlB
    I don't think anyone ever suggested that bow fishing would be a control method for ridding carp. It is just the greenies view that every creature is sacred and therefore cannot be dispatched to its maker.

    As a recreational pursuit, it is no different from any other form of fishing and it performs some small task of getting a carp than potentially produce 1 million eggs out of the system. The spin-off from those persons spending their hard earned travelling to and supporting the rural businesses in towns along the Murray Darling Basin is also a positive.

    A win win all round I would have thought
    Chenz
    I do not wish to be a member of any club that would have me as a member

    Former Owner of The Red Terror - 1992 Defender 200Tdi
    Edjitmobile - 2008 130 Defender

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chenz View Post
    I don't think anyone ever suggested that bow fishing would be a control method for ridding carp. It is just the greenies view that every creature is sacred and therefore cannot be dispatched to its maker.

    As a recreational pursuit, it is no different from any other form of fishing and it performs some small task of getting a carp than potentially produce 1 million eggs out of the system. The spin-off from those persons spending their hard earned travelling to and supporting the rural businesses in towns along the Murray Darling Basin is also a positive.

    A win win all round I would have thought
    Hi Chenz

    I suggest you go back to the original article linked in the first post to see what the differences are between bow-fishing and hook and line fishing.

    You say "I don't think anyone ever suggested that bow fishing would be a control method for ridding carp" then you say "... performs some small task of getting a carp than potentially produce 1 million eggs out of the system". Do you not see the inconsistency in these two statements? You are justifying bow-fishing on the grounds that it would contribute to carp control even if only in a small way. It wouldn't.

    As for 'greenies', the original article largely cites Dr Tom Grant who is a world authority on the Platypus and has worked on the species for nearly 50 years. Similarly, Prof. David Goldney is well respected by the scientific community for his knowledge of inland aquatic systems. You can label these scientists 'greenies' if you like. I am sure neither would dispute the significance of carp as a pest and indeed would be more aware of their impacts than you and me. Both would want to rid our waterways of the carp scourge.

    To my mind, the issue comes down to:


    • By-catch where a species other than carp are taken accidentally;
    • Intentional targeting of non-carp species by frustrated bow-fishers or purposeful wrong-doers; and
    • No significant impact of the activity on carp numbers or distribution in our natural waterways.

    Biological control of carp using a herpes type virus has been in the news the last few days. The following provides a good summary of this: [ame]http://www.pestsmart.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CPFS7.pdf[/ame]


    And to end on a lighter note:
    We're killing off carp with herpes. What other pests should we eradicate? | First Dog on the Moon | Opinion | The Guardian

    Cheers
    KarlB


  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Maryland 110 View Post
    Hope you don't have those flying carp in Oz. That looks to be a a clip shot here.
    They are destroying inland fisheries here.
    Not yet, at least.

    All it will take is for some Johnny Depp bozo to bring in a couple with Pistol and Boo and let them out for a swim in a local creek!

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    2,382
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Not yet, at least.

    All it will take is for some Johnny Depp bozo to bring in a couple with Pistol and Boo and let them out for a swim in a local creek!
    Has already been done with turtles and other fresh water aquatic pests. Plenty of streams contain mosquito fish , guppies etc. Have heard of areas near Kedron Brook with wild populations of Amazon Sword plants.
    Interesting though , no negative feedback on another introduced species of fish , Brown Trout. They surely must be taking the niche place of a native critter ?

  8. #18
    mikehzz Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Chenz View Post
    ......It is just the greenies view that every creature is sacred and therefore cannot be dispatched to its maker.....
    What a load of carp. One guy looking out for a platypus becomes all greenies and every creature? You take any interruption to your playtime very seriously indeed.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by trog View Post
    Has already been done with turtles and other fresh water aquatic pests. Plenty of streams contain mosquito fish , guppies etc. Have heard of areas near Kedron Brook with wild populations of Amazon Sword plants.
    Interesting though , no negative feedback on another introduced species of fish , Brown Trout. They surely must be taking the niche place of a native critter ?
    There are 43 exotic fish species established in Australia (see attachment Ferals_Exotic_Fish).

    An even larger number of native fishes (79 species) have been translocated to places in which they do not naturally occur. These 'native' species can be as problematic as the exotic introductions (see attachment Ferals_Native_Fish).

    Cheers
    KarlB
    Attached Files Attached Files

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    3rd planet from the sun
    Posts
    1,129
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KarlB View Post
    Hi Chenz

    I suggest you go back to the original article linked in the first post to see what the differences are between bow-fishing and hook and line fishing.

    You say "I don't think anyone ever suggested that bow fishing would be a control method for ridding carp" then you say "... performs some small task of getting a carp than potentially produce 1 million eggs out of the system". Do you not see the inconsistency in these two statements? You are justifying bow-fishing on the grounds that it would contribute to carp control even if only in a small way. It wouldn't.

    As for 'greenies', the original article largely cites Dr Tom Grant who is a world authority on the Platypus and has worked on the species for nearly 50 years. Similarly, Prof. David Goldney is well respected by the scientific community for his knowledge of inland aquatic systems. You can label these scientists 'greenies' if you like. I am sure neither would dispute the significance of carp as a pest and indeed would be more aware of their impacts than you and me. Both would want to rid our waterways of the carp scourge.

    To my mind, the issue comes down to:


    • By-catch where a species other than carp are taken accidentally;
    • Intentional targeting of non-carp species by frustrated bow-fishers or purposeful wrong-doers; and
    • No significant impact of the activity on carp numbers or distribution in our natural waterways.

    Biological control of carp using a herpes type virus has been in the news the last few days. The following provides a good summary of this: http://www.pestsmart.org.au/wp-conte...2/04/CPFS7.pdf


    And to end on a lighter note:
    We're killing off carp with herpes. What other pests should we eradicate? | First Dog on the Moon | Opinion | The Guardian

    Cheers
    KarlB


    Well that post and link was highly political and challenged all thought/opinion contrary to one political ideology, whilst resorting to personal attacks as a common attempt to mask what is clearly just another anti-hunting save all the animals (pests included) from the scary hunters - demonstrated by the irrelevant reference to guns in the attachment. What's next - stop farming because we don't need to eat or sell meat and vegetables?
    An obvious breach of the forum rules?

    But in the tone of the derogatory personal attacks in the linked article, it would seem a method likely to remain as the basis for responding to anyone not a supporter of this ideology...


    https://tasmps.greens.org.au/content...entient-beings

    What is a sentient being? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentie...%28Buddhism%29

    Definition

    Getz (2004: p. 760) provides a generalist Western Buddhist encyclopedic definition:

    Sentient beings is a term used to designate the totality of living, conscious beings that constitute the object and audience of Buddhist teaching. Translating various Sanskrit terms (jantu, bahu jana, jagat, sattva), sentient beings conventionally refers to the mass of living things subject to illusion, suffering, and rebirth (Saṃsāra). Less frequently, sentient beings as a class broadly encompasses all beings possessing consciousness, including Buddhas and Bodhisattvas.[1]

    Classification

    Early scriptures in the Pāli Canon and the conventions of the Tibetan Bhavacakra classify sentient beings into five categories'divinities, humans, animals, tormented spirits, and denizens of hell?although sometimes the classification adds another category of beings called devas between divinities and humans.[1]
    See also

    Animal consciousness
    Buddhist vegetarianism
    Human beings in Buddhism


    It seems that as this 'party' can't accept that the 'majority' won't vote for their 'alternative' lifestyle, they will attempt to gain recognition of all registered pets as 'voters' and claim those votes for their party. A new image of the old phrase 'gone to the dogs'. A valuable contribution to the senate?

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!