A lawyer would know better. The police should certainly know better. A shambles. The police linvolved cant escape this without being significantly tarnished.
Cheers
You only get one shot at life, Aim well
2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
4.6m Quintrex boat
20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone
A lawyer would know better. The police should certainly know better. A shambles. The police linvolved cant escape this without being significantly tarnished.
Cheers
The Lawyer , Lawyer x , was a gangland lawyer, the underworld kingpins were her friends. She turned Police informer. She provided Victorian Police with 5,500 information reports and 128 contact visits as an official informer. She got information from all sides and her information was always right. She grew up in in Melbourne's leafy inner west, in a blue blood legal family. Went to an exclusive private girls school. She was approached to become a police informer in 2005 after informally helping Purana Taskforce detectives from 2003. She turned on Victorian Police, which settled a compensation claim she made against the force with was a very large payout. Given her role she could expose the force as readily as she had exposed the crooks. She eventually became persona non gratia in the legal profession. A colleague , and foe, said " she wanted to be wanted ".
From the Courier Mail.
I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
The Premier has called for a Royal Commission , apparently.
'Tip of the iceberg': Gangland lawyer claims she tried to expose Informer 3838
I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food
A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking
Not long ago politicians were saying Muslims should provide information to help police. This lawyer did that and is now being criticised. Double-standard?
Mick it's a bit different due to the way in which she gained the knowledge.
Cheers
Yes, it's a breach of lawyer-client privilege, but so is making priests/counsellors report someone who admits committing a crime. Where do we draw the line between privacy and the public good?
Mick Priests have never been able to refuse to give evidence about what they were told in confessional (in modern law anyway). People who.consult lawyers need to have faith that they can tell them things and be honest and it isnt going to incriminate them.
Its the client's legal professional privilege not the lawyers. Only the client can waive that privilege.
Cheers
I thought a legal representative was compelled to be truthful, ie if a client admitted a crime to his representative, said advocate could not defend a not guilty plea, but only mitigate the offence by presenting the reasons in the best light.
If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks