Page 40 of 46 FirstFirst ... 303839404142 ... LastLast
Results 391 to 400 of 454

Thread: Goodnight Diesel. ...Land Rover get your EV skates on!

  1. #391
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sounds a bit suspect to me - as you say, no radioactive isotopes of lithium. The most common minerals containing lithium in potentially commercial concentrations are spodumene and petalite, both of which contain no elements with radioactive isotopes. However, another source is lepidolite, which contains potassium, the most widespread radioactive element in the crust. But it contains only 0.01% of the radioactive isotope (although potassium is the major source of radioactivity from coal ash!). Lithium brine deposits may be exploited for lithium, but since these are derived from the minerals listed, there is no reason to expect them to be radioactive.

    But I suspect that the suggestion comes from the fact that prior to the invention of lithium batteries, the major use of lithium was in thermo-nuclear weapons, with lithium deuteride the usual secondary fuel.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #392
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I’m assuming in the process off upgrading lithium other heavy metals are separated/removed which raise the radiation to above background.

    ...although everybody involved thinks Malaysia will renew the license....

    Either way it’s an issue that the minorities will jump on.

  3. #393
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Lithium is not a rare earth, and does not occur in conjunction with rare earths.

    Rare earths are not radioactive, but a major rare earth containing mineral is Monazite, which contains Thorium and/or uranium, which are, so processing the mineral will result in mildly radioactive waste. Rare earth metals however tend to be poisonous, as do compounds of some of the other components of Monazite.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #394
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by weeds View Post
    I’m assuming in the process off upgrading lithium other heavy metals ......
    Lithium is not a heavy metal - in fact it is the lightest metal, one of the lightest solids, and the third lightest element (in terms of atomic weight) after hydrogen and helium.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #395
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks John...all I know is there is an issue, big enough issue for all concerned to drop into the plant.

    I have the pleasure of knocking down a monazite processing plant.....interesting process I needed to navigate to avoid contaminated waste costs.

  6. #396
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by weeds View Post
    Thanks John...all I know is there is an issue, big enough issue for all concerned to drop into the plant.

    I have the pleasure of knocking down a monazite processing plant.....interesting process I needed to navigate to avoid contaminated waste costs.
    It would be! but nothing to do with lithium - although some of the rare earths may be used in tiny quantities in the batteries - but while they may be poisonous, they should not be radioactive.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  7. #397
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,888
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    I think the Hilux hybrid is about 3 years away. It will be great to see the tradies buying them. I reckon fleet sales will be enormous because of the lower running costs. What building company wouldn't want to save $100 a week on fuel costs? It's a no-brainer.
    Toyota are saying 3 to 6 yrs,before it arrives here.

    I don't know where $100/week comes from?

    Depends on initial cost,etc,etc,etc.

    None of toyota hybrids in Aus are plug in,they are in other countries.

    Not being plug in there are not really any huge savings,compared with current vehicles.

    They need to be here as well,then there will be much better savings.

  8. #398
    DiscoMick Guest
    Hybrids need refuelling less frequently because they can run part of the time on the electric motor. That's why hybrid Camrys are favoured as taxis.
    I didn't say it was a plug in.

  9. #399
    DiscoMick Guest
    The hybrid Camry only uses 4.2 litres per 100 kms. The Hilux hybrid is likely to be similar.

    2018 Toyota Camry Ascent Hybrid review | CarAdvice

  10. #400
    DiscoMick Guest
    Toyota is moving the Hilux to a new global platform to allow electrification of all passenger vehicles by 2025, the only question now is when a hybrid Hilux comes here.

Page 40 of 46 FirstFirst ... 303839404142 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!