Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 34

Thread: Name change

  1. #21
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discomatt69 View Post
    I think its nothing more than a last ditched attempt to save the company due to plummeting sales, massive loses all due to crap reputation, customers service, build quality and reliability.
    If they focused on quality over the last 20 years they would love the name because it a marque and at its base an excellent platform when working
    From what I can find they are actually in a pretty strong financial position globally - Australian figures won't make them lose any sleep given it's such a tiny market for them. Can't find any real year on year figures though without spending more time than I want to on it but if you have something let me know.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Whyalla, SA
    Posts
    7,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Land Rover name was built on “innovation, unrivalled capability, versatility” and later (Range Rover) with “Luxury”

    I would suggest they have done nothing but improve upon that in each vehicle.

    All modern versions are:
    - safer
    - more comfortable
    - more versatile (this one is harder to quantify)

    Versatile is a tough one. Statistically an increase in this can mean disappointment for others.

    A modern Defender for example.
    - move 6-7 people in full comfort
    - handles like a modern car on road
    - capable of most offroad (beyond extremes where people are modifying beyond stock anyway)
    - can carry a decent load (if you choose to throw a mess in the back is up to you)


    Softer lines seem to shock everyone here to some extent (you must all love 80s Volvos!)

    Sure Ineos has done something boxy, it’s a low volume producer and has exemptions for our market for example. LR is not, it needs market share to drive.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You're not suggesting they should build modern cars are you? That'll never work.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I listened to a Richard Porter podcast this morning (I won't link to it as it probably contained some naughty words). He actually rang the PR department to find out what was happening.

    Sounds like the press release was just a badly communicated bit of marketing rubbish. Seems the Land Rover name is not going anywhere, they are just trying to put more emphasis on the "brands" of Range Rover, Discovery and Defender.

    Remember, it quoted McGovern extensively. Need I say more.

    Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,795
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The change from Great Wall Motors to GWM possibly helped the public forget the bad press.

    LDV from Leyland Daf Vans and you forget the Leyland bad press.

    So changing from Jaguar Land Rover to JLR might do the same ??

    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Land Rover name was built on “innovation, unrivalled capability, versatility” and later (Range Rover) with “Luxury”

    I would suggest they have done nothing but improve upon that in each vehicle.
    Really?? Unrivalled?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    All modern versions are:
    - safer
    - more comfortable
    Agreed. But safety is achieved by dint of legislation. Comfort is subjective. Even the Chinese offerings are going to catch up.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Versatile is a tough one. Statistically an increase in this can mean disappointment for others.

    A modern Defender for example.
    - move 6-7 people in full comfort
    - handles like a modern car on road
    - capable of most offroad (beyond extremes where people are modifying beyond stock anyway)
    - can carry a decent load (if you choose to throw a mess in the back is up to you)
    All of which means it is just another face in the SUV crowd, which is fine for most, I guess.


    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    you must all love 80s Volvos!)
    A well known motoring scribe said of the newly released 740 " It will look good after they get it out of the box!".

    Someone once said "Tradition is peer pressure from dead people". Doesn't mean it's necessarily wise to ignore it, though. LR had a tradition of being different, standing out from the yapping classes. Once they lose that all they have to fall back on is reliability......, and I think that category is already filled.

    But. hey, I own an OKA, so am probably not the target market.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Homestar View Post
    Can't find any real year on year figures though without spending more time than I want to on it but if you have something let me know.
    Is this any help?

    2022 was worse,but this year maybe better.



    Sorry it maybe difficult to read,but i can't seem to make it any sharper.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Queensland (though occasionally elsewhere)
    Posts
    1,431
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    Really?? Unrivalled?



    Agreed. But safety is achieved by dint of legislation. Comfort is subjective. Even the Chinese offerings are going to catch up.



    All of which means it is just another face in the SUV crowd, which is fine for most, I guess.



    A well known motoring scribe said of the newly released 740 " It will look good after they get it out of the box!".

    Someone once said "Tradition is peer pressure from dead people". Doesn't mean it's necessarily wise to ignore it, though. LR had a tradition of being different, standing out from the yapping classes. Once they lose that all they have to fall back on is reliability......, and I think that category is already filled.

    But. hey, I own an OKA, so am probably not the target market.

    I'd just like to say how happy it has made me to see a post with the expression "by dint" in it.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    46
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Johnno1969 View Post
    I'd just like to say how happy it has made me to see a post with the expression "by dint" in it.
    Especially in reference to safety??

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!