Did you know.
Under Worksafe laws smoking is illegal in ALL workplaces.
There is only 1 exception,and that is for actors whilst on the set only,TRUE STORY!!!!
Andrew
I agree with Stevo on this one, it is incredibly rare to see someone smoking on TV or in movies these days, & as Stevo says, when you actually do see someone smoking, you notice. I do however seriously doubt it would make a blind bit of difference as to people actually starting to smoke because they see somebody on TV doing it.
Did you know.
Under Worksafe laws smoking is illegal in ALL workplaces.
There is only 1 exception,and that is for actors whilst on the set only,TRUE STORY!!!!
Andrew
DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
I made the 1 millionth AULRO post
Grumpy Old Men..UK Show.. which for some reason I am relating to more and more as the days go byI may be wrong but...
I think you'll find that Aust films and TV shows rarely show smoking anymore as compared to same shows back in the 60's & 70's
Pommy TV and movies have not quite caught up with Aust standards. I think more Poms still smoke and the anti-smoking laws over there are not as strict, so in Pommie TV you see more smoking
so....just watch Aust shows
OK...so you'll miss the best TV shows ever...but...what the heck
and...good on anyone who gives up smoking
You increase survival by a huge %. Guess that's cold comfort if you don't fancy living to a ripe old age, very often features the "subjects" smoking whilst conversing with the narrator,
Regards
Stevo
Yes there is a difference, but it is a difference in degree, not character - it is using a government's powers (in this case money) to affect the content of films.
For that matter, I've never really been too happy about government (my) money subsidising films anyway, but that is not the question under discussion.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
I don't accept your first point about the content of films being affected. Those films, or at least the more commercial ones, will still be made. I have acknowledged that all along.
The Fed Gov has a role to play in public health through education programs designed to discourage unhealthy behaviour.
Would some one please explain to me why it makes sense for the gov't on the one hand to be spending money discouraging people from smoking and on the other hand providing money for films which give a false impression about how common and socially acceptable smoking is.
Does it make sense for the govt to provide funds to encourage as well as discourage smoking?
Perhaps someone could also provide a reasonable alternative explanation for why so many young people believe that the majority of adults smoke when the real figure is 24%.
I have suggested that films have helped create that impression. I am willing to listen to other sensible explanations for that common misconception.
You may be right. I was under the impression that some Australian groups, including some medical bodies were concerned that the prevalence of smoking in films was on the increase again.
They may be wrong.
And so might I.
Which leads me to another point.
Someone (on TV, not on this forum) tried to argue that taking the smoking out of films would be as unrealistic as taking the rough language out of a pub scene.
Surely there are now few enclosed public places where smoking in permitted.
So a film set in Aus in 2008 could easily have a lot of scenes where it would be unrealistic to have the characters smoking.
The answers to some people's questions and objections can be found here:
The NSW Public Health Bulletin May-June 2004: Promoting tobacco to the young in the age of advertising bans
Film is arguably the most influential medium among the young. There is strong evidence that seeing smoking in film encourages children to smoke. One study found that non-smoking teenagers whose favourite film stars smoked on screen are up to 16 times more likely to view smoking favourably.
... and here:
ASH Australia media release: Oscars tobacco 2004 movie smoking films
A study published this month in the American Journal of Public Health* shows the incidence of smoking scenes in randomly-selected movies, after falling in the early 80s, had risen again since the 1990s to levels observed in 1950 – when smoking rates were twice as high.
... and here:
The Cancer Council New South Wales :: Reeling Them In - Smoking in movies
Out of the top ten non-animated movies at the Australian box-office in 2006 , seven contained smoking.
I will leave you to read them if you are interested.
If you google "smoking in films" on Australian sites, you will find several others.
NB. Some of these sites are advocating a ban.
I am not.
I am just suggesting that the gov't stops spending money on promoting smoking at the same time as it spends money aimed at discouraging people.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks