Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30

Thread: RivNuts - Brilliant

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    darwin, nt
    Posts
    532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sorry, I was a bit too vague...

    I have spun a few rivnuts when dismantling Series 3s. They of course then are impossible to remove without butchering, and you can't fit new ones into the stretched holes. I destroyed a perfectly good bulkhead whilst trying to take off the lower dash unit. I have had my fill of Series 3s for this reason. And I hate rivnuts.

    Dan.
    69 2A 88" pet4, 68 2B FC pet6.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    the series isnt supposed to have rivnuts its ment to have speednuts.


    the best thing about the speed nut is if it spins in its caseing it will fall out if pried hard enough or if it twists when halfway out a quick slap with a hammer punches the nut out of the holder and then it pulls out.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Singapore via Melbourne
    Posts
    1,938
    Total Downloaded
    0
    visit your nearest aircraft supply warehouse - cad plated rivnuts, bolts etc are the dog's danglies when it comes to not causing corrosion of either itself or the aluminium panel... but it is cadmium, which is very toxic... somewhere on here there is a table running around of bi-metal galvanic potentials (what metals match well and what don't). Stainless and aluminium (contrary to popular opion) are NOT a good match - the aluminium disappears, but the stainless is fine! cad palted nuts, bolts, washers and rivnuts are cheaper than stainless too at my local place "the metric men"

  4. #14
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,527
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by spudboy View Post
    .....

    Am sure they have been around for ages...... and I am just not up to speed with these things
    I am not sure how old they are - but I first came across them used to install the winch on my Series 1 - I saw them on it in 1962, but the winch would have been installed in 1956, so that makes them at least fifty years old.

    According to Wikipedia, they date to the 1930s.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I never realised they have been around so long.

    Can someone please confirm, as stated above, that Stainless Steel and Aluminium is a no-no. . If so I've got some attachments to remove

    I went for Stainless rivnuts as I thought the aluminium ones were a bit soft and risked stripping the thread.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    the stainless is ok.... its just when you put it with aluminium...

    there'll be no no aluminium left after a while.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  7. #17
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,527
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As Dave says. If you use stainless with aluminium and its alloys, you should insulate the two. If you visit a marine chandler, they should be able to sell you a variety of insulating washers and sleeves that are used when bolting stainless fittings to aluminium masts etc. If you live in a very arid area, then the problem is not too bad, but then there would be little reason to use stainless bolts, would there?

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks guys, I had known of the dissimilar metals issue and had always used alloy, although someone told me you can use stainless too, which I did. (I am only a few kms from the coast). Can't belive everything you hear!

  9. #19
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,527
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleepy View Post
    Thanks guys, I had known of the dissimilar metals issue and had always used alloy, although someone told me you can use stainless too, which I did. (I am only a few kms from the coast). Can't belive everything you hear!
    You can use galvanised bolts - which is why Landrovers are put together with galvanised bolts - not that Landrover have been very good about keeping dissimilar metals apart, usually relying only on a thin coat of paint to separate them, for example in the doorframes.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks John, I have just been reading about galvanic corrosion and the galvanic table.

    http://www.auf.asn.au/scratchbuilder/galvanic_table.html

    Hence zinc and al being closer together on the table means less cathodic potential ..... (sounds like I know what I'm talking about)

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!