Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 59

Thread: 10 most and least reliable cars survey

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    572
    Total Downloaded
    0

    10 most and least reliable cars survey

    Surprised to see Audi down there. Not quite as surprised to see a couple of LR's and a couple of Jags. Still love my Disco !

    Money Central - Times Online - WBLG

    July 28, 2009

    The 10 most reliable new cars - and the 10 most likely to go wrong

    Honda, the Japanese manufacturer, produces the most reliable motor cars, according to a new study by Which?

    The consumer group surveyed more than 84,000 drivers to establish which new cars suffered the fewest breakdowns, faults and niggles. Honda was the clear winner with four of its models in the top ten.

    The Honda Accord, which sells for just under £20,000, came top with a reliability rating of 98.5 per cent, while the Honda Jazz came a close second with a 98.2 per cent.

    At the other end of the scale, the Audi A5 was rated the new car most likely to go wrong, scoring just 75.8 per cent for reliability, putting it bottom of the 121 models reviewed. Owners of the coupe reported significant problems with its electrics.

    Here is the top and bottom ten in full.

    The 10 most reliable new cars

    1. Honda Accord 98.5%

    2. Honda Jazz (2008-present) 98.2%

    3. Daihatsu Sirion 97.5%

    4. Hyundai i30 96.8%

    5. Ford Fiesta 96.2%

    6. Honda Jazz (2002-2008) 95.9%

    7. Honda Civic Hybrid 95.7%

    8. Citroën C1 95.7%

    9. Toyota Prius 95.0%

    10. Mazda 3 94.4%

    The 10 least reliable new cars

    112. Hyundai Santa Fe 82.2%

    113. Jaguar S-type 81.2%

    114. Volvo XC90 80.6%

    115. Land Rover Freelander 80.1%

    116. Ford S-Max 79.9%

    117. Land Rover Discovery 79.5%

    118. Alfa Romeo 159 79.0%

    119. Jaguar XF 78.0%

    120. Ford Galaxy 76.3%

    121. Audi A5 75.8%

  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Problem with this sort of survey is usually in the definition of reliability. And no two people will agree completely, for example, on how you weigh a large number of minor niggling problems against one show stopper. The reality is, you can't.

    And then similarly, how do you weight things like time off road to fix, cost to fix etc.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You took the word right out of my mouth John.

    Also, they appear to only deal with vehicle in their first year or so of life.

    I wonder how my 31 year old series 3 would stack up against a similar age Holden, Ford or Toyota? (if you could find one!)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Problem with this sort of survey is usually in the definition of reliability. And no two people will agree completely, for example, on how you weigh a large number of minor niggling problems against one show stopper. The reality is, you can't.

    And then similarly, how do you weight things like time off road to fix, cost to fix etc.
    John
    Time off the road and cost to fix? My bet is that Land Rover would lose on all counts, just ask Dullbird and muddymech about the trials of their puma engined Defender.

    Or CapeLandy with the missing seals in his one and any number of other owners.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleepy View Post
    ...Also, they appear to only deal with vehicle in their first year or so of life.
    That would be the parameters of the survey, they are studying the customer satisfaction of original owners over the first year of the vehicles life.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleepy View Post
    I wonder how my 31 year old series 3 would stack up against a similar age Holden, Ford or Toyota? (if you could find one!)
    Possibly quite well, that is because most other cars have fallen apart, however by the time the current flock of Land Rovers are 31 years old, if they still exist, they will be held together with parts cannibalised of other dead Land Rovers and retrofitted with after-market electronics to replace the long dead and unobtainable OEM items.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    572
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Problem with this sort of survey is usually in the definition of reliability. And no two people will agree completely, for example, on how you weigh a large number of minor niggling problems against one show stopper. The reality is, you can't.

    And then similarly, how do you weight things like time off road to fix, cost to fix etc.

    John
    Good points, presumably though cost to fix is zip as they are new and under warranty ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Derbyshire UK
    Posts
    4,370
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Worst car I ever had was a Reliant Robin(plastic pig) best has been a Defender, 2.8i Capri wasn't bad either.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Manly QLD
    Posts
    1,452
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Problem with this sort of survey is usually in the definition of reliability. And no two people will agree completely, for example, on how you weigh a large number of minor niggling problems against one show stopper. The reality is, you can't.

    And then similarly, how do you weight things like time off road to fix, cost to fix etc.

    John
    I also think we would find that the average owner of a new Jag, Audi or LR would scream louder than the owner of an i30 / jazz / civic... I’m not saying that the Jap cars aren’t reliable but have a look at the top list – something in common about the price?

    I’m yet to meet a Toyota owner that has ever had a problem – my brother in-law is currently fitting his 3rd engine to his 2.8d Hilux and still tells me how good Toyota are – they never give trouble – that tow truck was just a precaution (and he’s serious)... Least I admit (or complain) that my LR has given more than it’s far share of problems....
    L322 3.6TDv8 Lux

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    572
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=Grockle;1043460]Worst car I ever had was a Reliant Robin(plastic pig)

    Good old Reliant Robins - of Dell boy fame no less. Haven't heard of them for years.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Time off the road and cost to fix? My bet is that Land Rover would lose on all counts, just ask Dullbird and muddymech about the trials of their puma engined Defender.
    CapeLandy with the missing seals in his one and any number of other owners.
    Won't try an defend the Puma - although plenty of happy owners here too. However the old man bought his 3 yo Disco 3 (Tdv6) last year and is very very happy with it. [And that's coming from a career Toyota owner!!!!] I haven't heard of a Disco 3 owner with other than niggly problems.

    Pity they didn't put the tdv6 (and the new 3litre) in the Defender

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Sleepy View Post
    ...Pity they didn't put the tdv6 (and the new 3litre) in the Defender
    Have to agree with you on that, but it seems that it is the policy of JLR in the UK that the engines should be a part of the status and price of the upper end models rather than as a drive-train option for people who wish to specify them with respect to their needs.

    e.g. the grey nomad customer who wants the luggage/rear passenger space of the D3/4 and the capabilities of the TDV8 for towing the 31' caravan.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!