
Originally Posted by
disco2hse
Good points John, but do you think he would have been awarded the prize if he had either failed in his presidential bid or never ran for presidency?
I don't think you can remove the fact of his status from the decision to award him the prize.
Alan
No, you are right, in the sense that it is only his status as president that allows, for example, his stance on nuclear weapons, to have any impact. Without his being elected, his views on this (or anything else) as a senator would be insignificant compared to their influence as president.
But this does still not make the comments about the US role as a superpower or its past foreign policy relevant, except as background to the present award. Although I suspect that the relative change from the previous administration's attitude may have a lot to do with the award, so in that respect they may be relevant, but not as stated.
john
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Bookmarks