Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Holden Red Conversion

  1. #21
    aussipro Guest
    Hi Guys
    Thanks for the info and will look into, much appreciated

    regards Bruce.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    under a rock, next to a tree, at Broadmarsh
    Posts
    6,738
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    A full rebuild, a more suitable cam grind, high volume oil pump, the correct sump and baffles for the job. Attend to the carburettor with a float bowl packer, pressure regulator, return line.
    High volume oil pump, I may have one of those but how can I be sure it is high volume by looking at it?
    .

  3. #23
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wrinklearthur View Post
    High volume oil pump, I may have one of those but how can I be sure it is high volume by looking at it?
    .
    It is physically deeper than a standard unit and uses longer bolts to hold it on. If you have a standard one as well, you will soon notice the difference. Or post a pic, should be able to tell from that.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,905
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bacicat View Post
    If you end up with a choice between a 186 and a 202, go for the 186 - it is better suited to the series vehicle, and IMO was a better and smoother engine than the 202.
    Would a 202 with it's longer stroke be a better choice with 3.54 diffs or an overdrive (or both) as the engine revs would be lower and the 202 should have more torque?


    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  5. #25
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In that scenario, then probably yes, the 202 would be a better option. If it were to have standard diff ratios, then the 186 is a freer revving engine and would suit better.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bacicat View Post
    In that scenario, then probably yes, the 202 would be a better option. If it were to have standard diff ratios, then the 186 is a freer revving engine and would suit better.
    Ummmm, 202's in GTR Toranas were revving freely to over 7000rpm in race engines and for 500 miles at Bathurst.
    URSUSMAJOR

  7. #27
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    Ummmm, 202's in GTR Toranas were revving freely to over 7000rpm in race engines and for 500 miles at Bathurst.
    I understand that and didn't say that a 202 won't rev, but a 186 has less revolving mass and spins up quicker - a freer revving engine, not a higher revving engine.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Porongurup Western Australia
    Posts
    332
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Looking at getting a 186 to replace the dodgy 202 I got for free cause it's gonna cost me too much to repair but it would still run just needs some money and time. The 186 seems to get a better wrap from everyone in a Landy than the 202 just cause the 186 is a more freely revving motor. Cause I wanna chase foxes and tear around the farm the easier revving motor would suit better and I should be able to extract enough grunt out of it to get the big beast up to speed quick, my rear tyres aren't gonna like me but they won't have a choice being on gravel with a bit extra power Just need someone whose willing to trade a rough 202 for a reasonable 186, shouldn't be too hard

  9. #29
    Homestar's Avatar
    Homestar is offline Super Moderator & CA manager Subscriber
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've got a 173 you can have cheap, - but you'll have to take the rest of the series III it's attached to as well...
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Porongurup Western Australia
    Posts
    332
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for the offer, not really looking for a 173 or a whole series 3 to go with, I've put the 202 up for swaps to see if any of the speedway boys will pick it up and maybe have a 186 to trade.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!