Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 34

Thread: DC/DC CTEK D250S Dual in D4

  1. #1
    Javii_V7_I Guest

    DC/DC CTEK D250S Dual in D4

    Hi;

    I wanted to ask you that you think the DC / DC Dual CTEK D250S for connecting an auxiliary battery in the D4.
    Do you think it will work with the new charging system of D4?. From what I read is important to connect the negative ground terminal and the negative terminal of the main battery, but they are still operating according to the main battery voltage, so my question


    (Sorry for my english)

  2. #2
    Wilbur Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Javii_V7_I View Post
    Hi;

    I wanted to ask you that you think the DC / DC Dual CTEK D250S for connecting an auxiliary battery in the D4.
    Do you think it will work with the new charging system of D4?. From what I read is important to connect the negative ground terminal and the negative terminal of the main battery, but they are still operating according to the main battery voltage, so my question


    (Sorry for my english)
    Hi Javi,

    Welcome to the forum.

    In general, DC to DC type dual battery systems seem ideal for the D4. There are a lot of different views on this forum and this is my view. I prefer the DC to DC converters because they give the correct multi-stage charging that helps the auxiliary battery to charge more completely and to last longer.

    However, the specs on the D250S do not specify that the starter battery is automatically disconnected when the car engine is stopped. It seems that you also need to fit the Ctek SmartPass to isolate and protect the starter battery. With the complex electronics in the D4, draining the starter battery can mean trouble.

    The SmartPass is expensive. You can do a similar thing with a cheap automotive relay that only connects the D250S to the starter battery when the D4 ignition is switched on.

    Most important though see this post from Drivesafe - he shows you where to connect the negative lead. http://www.aulro.com/afvb/d3-d4-rrs/...-warnings.html

    Cheers,

    Paul

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    2,351
    Total Downloaded
    0
    DC/DC chargers are fine for the D4 just more expensive than other options.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Javii and welcome to AULRO.

    What sort of battery are you going to use as your auxiliary and where are you mounting it?

  5. #5
    Javii_V7_I Guest
    Hi, and thanks for the responses.

    On the issue of the CTEK not disconnect when the car is stopped, thought about putting a relay fix. But I'm not sure that a system DC / DC which is based on the voltage of the starter battery to function properly in these new D4. Is that it worked properly RoverLander (with redarc) after connecting the negative terminal to ground and the negative terminal of the main battery, but I still have clear because this meant the improvement.

    Regarding the battery had thought to put an Optima Yellow Top 4.2 (55 Ah) in the engine box, if I can change the ECU and wiring in place.

    Cheers,

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi again Javii, there is a link below to the VERANDAH section on this site and this will give you an idea of how you can set up your D4.

    The kit is for a D3 but if you move the ECU, the kit is exactly the same for a D4.

    Because you are going to use an Optima Battery ( the Optima D34 is the correct battery for the D4 ) you are far better off not using a DC-DC device because the Optima Yellow Top can take full inrush currents when charging and combine this with the way the D4 charges, you nearly fully charge an Optima battery from a low state in about an hours driving.

    I’ve measured up to 64 amps going into a low Optima and a D3 owner in the UK has measured up to 97 amps going into his Optima when the battery was near flat.

    DC-DC devices just can’t handle these sorts of load and again, the way both a D4 charges and the way an Optima can be charged, just mating the two, via a decent isolator will give you the best set up.

    Again, the kit in this link will give you an idea of the way to set up your D4 and I supply these kit world wide.


    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/verandah/6...le-kit-d3.html

  7. #7
    Wilbur Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Javii_V7_I View Post
    Hi, and thanks for the responses.

    On the issue of the CTEK not disconnect when the car is stopped, thought about putting a relay fix. But I'm not sure that a system DC / DC which is based on the voltage of the starter battery to function properly in these new D4. Is that it worked properly RoverLander (with redarc) after connecting the negative terminal to ground and the negative terminal of the main battery, but I still have clear because this meant the improvement.

    Regarding the battery had thought to put an Optima Yellow Top 4.2 (55 Ah) in the engine box, if I can change the ECU and wiring in place.

    Cheers,
    Hi Javi,

    The DC - DC system will work properly regardless of the starter battery voltage. That is the best reason to go for the DC-DC - they charge properly whatever the starting battery voltage.

    Also, in my experience alternators can be damaged by excessive current draw - with both the starter battery and the auxiliary battery drawing high current it puts a big load on the alternator. In my experience this reduces alternator life, maybe as little as five years.

    The relay fix and the D250S should work very well for you.

    Cheers,

    Paul

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So what your saying Wilbur, is by adding a DC-DC device to the set up you now have a better system.

    Well your math does not add up.

    To add a DC-DC device to a D4 set up means the Optima battery if low will actually far take longer to fully charge than when using nothing more than a standard isolator.

    Next, with your suggested set, you need to spend far more to get less available battery capacity.

    Your set up give 44Ah of usable battery capacity while an SC80-LR gives at least 85Ah for a lower set up cost and this 85 Ah will be replaced far quicker than your DC-DC device can do it.

    As to alternator use, with the 180 amp alternators in a D4, are suggesting that even if a battery pulled 90 amps while charging then the alternator is going to be damaged.

    Tell me then why the same alleged damage has not happened in D3s with their smaller 140 amp alternators.

    You do like to make up mythical problems, don’t you Wilbur?

  9. #9
    Wilbur Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by drivesafe View Post
    So what your saying Wilbur, is by adding a DC-DC device to the set up you now have a better system.

    Well your math does not add up.

    To add a DC-DC device to a D4 set up means the Optima battery if low will actually far take longer to fully charge than when using nothing more than a standard isolator.

    Next, with your suggested set, you need to spend far more to get less available battery capacity.

    Your set up give 44Ah of usable battery capacity while an SC80-LR gives at least 85Ah for a lower set up cost and this 85 Ah will be replaced far quicker than your DC-DC device can do it.

    As to alternator use, with the 180 amp alternators in a D4, are suggesting that even if a battery pulled 90 amps while charging then the alternator is going to be damaged.

    Tell me then why the same alleged damage has not happened in D3s with their smaller 140 amp alternators.

    You do like to make up mythical problems, don’t you Wilbur?
    Hi Drivesafe,

    No, I don't think I am making up mythical problems. You see, if the auxiliary battery takes 90 amps the starter battery will also be taking current, and this could be getting close to the maximum alternator rating. ~Rich~ had to replace his alternator at 5 years - see http://www.aulro.com/afvb/d3-d4-rrs/...g-voltage.html Maybe if he had been using a DC - DC system that put less load on the alternator than the Traxide this would not have happened.

    Yes, I do understand that the Traxide system gives more usable power for the auxiliary loads than any other system because it also drains the starter battery into the auxiliary loads. For those not worried by this, the Traxide is great, and has been proven over the years.

    However, for those who don't want to drain their starting battery, I believe the DC - DC system is the best and well worth the extra money.

    Cheers,

    Paul

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As far as high current draw goes, with all these set ups including Rich’s, because they are not pulling high currents every time they get into their D3 or D4 or any other vehicle for that matter, the loads are irrelevant.

    These high current draws are only likely to be periodical at best or are you saying any high current draw will damage an alternator.

    If so then why is yet another one of your unsubstantiated theories not happening. If you were correct, then there would be all forms of vehicles lining up at auto electricians to get their alternators repaired/replaced.

    The fact is that there are few alternator failures, whether the vehicle has a dual battery system or not, and means that this is just another one of your unsubstantiated scare mongering attempts to make out you know something about a field you quite obviously know nothing about.

    This is also valid as per your claim about it not being safe to discharge a cranking battery down to 50%. This is based on nothing more than your ignorance, not on any factual evidence.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!