Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 43

Thread: Restricted Performance.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markorjack View Post
    apparently if you do the chip they recommend the exhaust but for the remap it is not required.
    I'm intrigued by this statement.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    I'm intrigued by this statement.
    "intrigued" isn't the word I had in mind

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Hadspen
    Posts
    45
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    When the car is under load, such as towing a heavy trailer uphill, is precisely the time when you DON'T want a remap/chip to be in effect.
    Could you please explain why Gordon?
    Cheers.

    Just to add, I drove another 850 odd k's today from Parkes to Toowoomba via the Newell Highway with quite a few long hills.
    No further engine faults and it seems to be going well.

    Don't take this as disagreeing with you as I really don't know much about modern engines

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Orange, NSW
    Posts
    7,965
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Because a chip/remap is going to be raising the 'stresses' on the vehicle, higher EGTs, etc.
    Towing with a standard power package is going to raise these stresses anyway, so combining the stresses of towing with the stresses of a remap or chip, your vehicle is going to be really pushing it in terms of what's safe unless you've got suitably uprated performance components; bigger IC, etc.
    The Phantom - Oslo Blue 2001 Td5 SE.
    Half dead but will live again!

    Nina - Chawton White 2003 Td5 S
    Slowly being improved

    Quote Originally Posted by Judo View Post
    You worry me sometimes Muppet!!


  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Hadspen
    Posts
    45
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I can understand the logic but isn't a chip/remap just putting the engine back where it could safely be rather than the de-tuned state it is in from the manufacturer?

  6. #26
    sheerluck Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by markorjack View Post
    I can understand the logic but isn't a chip/remap just putting the engine back where it could safely be rather than the de-tuned state it is in from the manufacturer?
    There's the issue right there, an assumption that it is actually de-tuned. Why would it be de-tuned? The manufacturer is going to want to give the engine the best balance of longevity, performance and economy. Any changes in tuning has the ability to negatively effect one, many or all of those factors.

    But you can't really know for sure how "de-tuned" that engine is without doing a huge amount of testing.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Hadspen
    Posts
    45
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by sheerluck View Post
    There's the issue right there, an assumption that it is actually de-tuned. Why would it be de-tuned? The manufacturer is going to want to give the engine the best balance of longevity, performance and economy. Any changes in tuning has the ability to negatively effect one, many or all of those factors.
    My understanding is that because the same engine is sold all over the world it is tuned to suit a vast array of requirements.
    As well as the fact if an engine isn't working anywhere close to it's capacity the chance of warranty claims is much less.

    I'm happy to trade a bit of longevity for performance and economy, as long as it is only a little bit of longevity

    I will not be keeping this vehicle for 200,000 k's like I have with my old technology Troopy.

    Another 700k's today without issue, but again, I am not discounting anything said by others in this thread, all good knowledge to have in the bag.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markorjack View Post
    My understanding is that because the same engine is sold all over the world it is tuned to suit a vast array of requirements.
    As well as the fact if an engine isn't working anywhere close to it's capacity the chance of warranty claims is much less.
    Many tuning companies love to talk up this point, but none have the data to back it up, especially for specific makes and models.

    Just go back to simple logic and a few solid observations from people on this forum. The D4 3.0 ltr in standard tune can trigger a restricted performance warning - most cases occur when towing close to the limit uphill with the cruise control on. Software updates have reduced this occurrence, but remapping/chipping will simply push you back up towards the edge of the safety envelope again.

    If you insist on a remap, it should be for purely performance reasons, not as an aid to towing - go easy on the throttle if that's what you're doing.

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Hadspen
    Posts
    45
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    Many tuning companies love to talk up this point, but none have the data to back it up, especially for specific makes and models.

    Just go back to simple logic and a few solid observations from people on this forum. The D4 3.0 ltr in standard tune can trigger a restricted performance warning - most cases occur when towing close to the limit uphill with the cruise control on. Software updates have reduced this occurrence, but remapping/chipping will simply push you back up towards the edge of the safety envelope again.

    If you insist on a remap, it should be for purely performance reasons, not as an aid to towing - go easy on the throttle if that's what you're doing.
    All good Gordon.

    I have been pretty easy on the throttle on this trip and sail up most hills at 110 in the mid rev range, even with the loaded trailer.

    The performance is very noticeable, overtaking is a breeze.
    Fuel economy is 14.5 litres per 100 which I don't have anything to compare to as I have only towed the trailer once on a short trip since the remap.

    I also haven't really had a chance to compare the economy when not towing.

    When I got the fault I was doing about 120 up a long hill with the trailer unloaded but since then I have had no issues.

    This car doesn't tow all the time, in fact it is quite rare but I am moving to the Atherton Tablelands where any towing it does do will be up the quite steep Gillies or Kuranda ranges.
    In my favour is the fact that these will be quite slow drives.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by markorjack View Post
    I can understand the logic but isn't a chip/remap just putting the engine back where it could safely be rather than the de-tuned state it is in from the manufacturer?
    Nope. That's pure bull**** pedalled by people with no idea and products to sell.

    You are also not trading longevity, you are risking meltdown. It is only the ecu protection that has stopped that happening already.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!