Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: D3/4 or RRS -which is better for offroad play + touring?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    565
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    ??... the RRS has a slight advantage offroad - it's more manoeuvrable due to shorter wheelbase. ?.

    Cheers,

    Gordon
    Are you sure? can you provide measurements please.
    2003 D2a Auto TD5 good Landy gone
    2015 D4 probably the most amazing yet, why get a RR?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    3,775
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Having driven Pajeros off road they run out of wheel travel and clearance in a heart beat. Its not unlike what a D4 would be WITHOUT all the bits that simulate live axle articulation and clearance...ie they run out of off road ability very quickly. I also dont like their slow steering and onroad noise. However their brakes are excellent and they are very well sorted reliability wise with little to go wrong given the lack of electrickery in the suspension etc.

    Cheers
    Sorry Scott but what vehicle are you talking about? ... are you having a shot at the Pajero or the D4 or both?
    Cheers,
    Terry

    D1 V8 (Gone)
    D2a HSE V8 (Gone)
    D3 HSE TDV6 (Unfortunately Gone)
    D4 V8

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Pajero

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicky View Post
    Are you sure? can you provide measurements please.
    Wheelbase for the RRS is 100", D4 is 110" or there abouts, I'm fairly sure the approach and departure angles are better on the RRS also.

    Overall, the D4 is a better package, it's cheaper, has more available accessories, softer ride and has more load space.

    That's not to say you can't set the RRS up as a tourer, far from it and I would imagine it would make an excellent tourer.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  5. #15
    SBD4's Avatar
    SBD4 is offline A Keeper of the TGO Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bundeena
    Posts
    2,809
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think the wheel bases are 108.1" RRS(L320) vs 113.6" Disco. Funny thing is that the turning circle is very marginally better on the Disco 11.50M for RRS vs 11.45M on the Disco. The L494 RRS is bigger in every way than the disco, 115" wheelbase & 12.3M turning circle.
    Cheers,

    Sean

    “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” - Albert Einstein

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    565
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Redback View Post
    Wheelbase for the RRS is 100", D4 is 110" or there abouts, I'm fairly sure the approach and departure angles are better on the RRS also.
    Baz.
    Well, from the official Land Rover site:-
    wheelbase RRS 2923mm
    D4 2885mm
    2003 D2a Auto TD5 good Landy gone
    2015 D4 probably the most amazing yet, why get a RR?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SBD4 View Post
    I think the wheel bases are 108.1" RRS(L320) vs 113.6" Disco. Funny thing is that the turning circle is very marginally better on the Disco 11.50M for RRS vs 11.45M on the Disco. The L494 RRS is bigger in every way than the disco, 115" wheelbase & 12.3M turning circle.
    I did say there abouts

    According to the website as you say it's, 113.5" D4, 115.1" RRS, which supprised me, I thought it was the other way around still.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicky View Post
    Well, from the official Land Rover site:-
    wheelbase RRS 2923mm
    D4 2885mm
    Yep going on the 2015 specs, but 108.1" for previous models as said above by Sean.

    I haven't quite got to rivet counting status as yet, when it comes to Land Rovers

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    565
    Total Downloaded
    0
    "Thereabouts" is not an engineering spec.
    2003 D2a Auto TD5 good Landy gone
    2015 D4 probably the most amazing yet, why get a RR?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Coffs Harbour
    Posts
    504
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicky View Post
    "Thereabouts" is not an engineering spec.
    Close enough with an assumption.
    2012 Fuji White 3.0 D4, Rear view camera, Hi-line sound, E-diff, Xenon lights, ARB winch bar, Lightforce 240 50w HID. Brads sliders.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Nicky View Post

    Are you sure? can you provide measurements please.
    Yes I'm sure. No I can't provide measurements (I'm not at home), although I did in an old thread on here
    Do a search. The OP was referring to the L320 RRS, not the new L494.

    Cheers,

    Gordon

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!