Page 6 of 115 FirstFirst ... 456781656106 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 1143

Thread: Which is better Off Road a D3/4 or a late model Defender? ... Puma 110

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    3,775
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by MrLandy View Post
    Apart from the character vs luxury debate, the big difference between Defenders and Disco's is long term ruggedness and chassis strength.

    If you go bush occasionally buy a Disco. If you go bush all the time get a Defender.
    .

    I thought I would let a few others comment about this before I did. As has been explained that chassis on a late model Disco, RRS is incredibly strong and robust, so is the monocuque body that is bolted to it, that is why they weigh so much.

    There is a huge lack of knowledge by Defender owners about their late model cousins and this often leads to interesting comments like the one I have quoted above and responded to here.

    You will not find more than a couple of discussions in this section over the ten years the T5 platform has been used in these vehicles about broken axles or CV's, even though I know one bloke who is pretty good at breaking them.

    As of about three years ago one can buy a ARB front locker for your D3, mind you don't know anyone that has yet, as far as I know you can't buy aftermarket axles, crown wheel and pinions, CV's or different diff ratio's etc for a D3/4/RRS and there is a reason for that. They is no market for them.

    How many discussions are there in the Defender section about replacing OEM drive train parts with aftermarket axles, CV's, Lockers, pegging etc etc? The answer is many dozens. How much money would Ashcroft alone make out of Defender owners? The answer is squillions, add in Detroit, ARB and the others and I bet they are all going to cry when LR stop building the present model Defenders.

    The reality by far is the chassis and running gear in a D3/4/RRS is easily much stronger and far more reliable then any similar aged Defender / Puma. Given the many problems Puma's used to have with their six speed gearboxes and clutches the same could be said for most if not all of the running gear. Nothing is ever perfect and there will always be failures but the never ending list of failures with Defenders both old and new is pretty astounding and seriously undermines this long held belief by Defenders owners that their vehicles are stronger and more durable.

    If I was a potential new model Defender owner, which I might be, I would be hoping LR don't throw away the Discovery's T5 platform when they stop building D4's and that they use it as the basis for the new soon to be released better stronger and more reliable Defender.

    Anyway back to which is more capable off road with the same size and spec tyres.
    Cheers,
    Terry

    D1 V8 (Gone)
    D2a HSE V8 (Gone)
    D3 HSE TDV6 (Unfortunately Gone)
    D4 V8

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Williams West Aust
    Posts
    20,998
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Gordon is crazy.Seen him do stuff in a brand new D3 that a normal person wouldnt do in a bashed up series
    Gordon,Aaron40 and I just both discovered how poor the 19" tyres are in soft deep sand over the last few days.Until then we had Ron trading in his yet to be delivered Defender on a D4 Something about the quietness,the smoothness of the 8 speed,oh,and the way it can take off with a 1.5 tonne camper trailer hanging off the back,and the economy doing so
    It seems anything over 20lbs wont work.15lbs went well,BUT the tyres look almost flat on hard ground.Aaron did get stuck with 25lbs trying to park off the traffic track.Was impresed how well the max tracks worked.
    We both decided we need 18" rims if we want to do much beach work.We also discussed doing the sand training at some stage.
    Mine got stuck a few times too,was able to get it out by airing down futher.The sand there at Horrocks seemed coarser and softer than we are used to in the south west.All 3 of us believe our D2s wouldnt have had dramas.Having said that,that sand could have been hard for D2s,didnt have one handy to try





    Andrew
    DISCOVERY IS TO BE DISOWNED
    Midlife Crisis.Im going to get stuck into mine early and ENJOY it.
    Snow White MY14 TDV6 D4
    Alotta Fagina MY14 CAT 12M Motor Grader
    2003 Stacer 525 Sea Master Sport
    I made the 1 millionth AULRO post

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Dare I suggest the reasons the D3/4 doesn't do CV's and drive shafts is a combination of tyre size (diameter, most only have problems with the Defender CV's once they get past 33" tyres, we won't mention the P38 diff and Sals axles were definitely made from cheddar) sophisticated TC (less shock loading on the drive line) and probably better design and material spec (which wouldn't be hard compared to some of the Deefer stuff, it is crap, and LR have continually downgraded specs over the last twenty five years, the last twelve months capping it off by installing an inferior 2 gear centre diff)

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LandyAndy View Post
    Gordon is crazy.Seen him do stuff in a brand new D3 that a normal person wouldnt do in a bashed up series
    Gordon,Aaron40 and I just both discovered how poor the 19" tyres are in soft deep sand over the last few days.Until then we had Ron trading in his yet to be delivered Defender on a D4 Something about the quietness,the smoothness of the 8 speed,oh,and the way it can take off with a 1.5 tonne camper trailer hanging off the back,and the economy doing so
    It seems anything over 20lbs wont work.15lbs went well,BUT the tyres look almost flat on hard ground.Aaron did get stuck with 25lbs trying to park off the traffic track.

    Andrew
    Book into the next sand training in Perth - dates should be up next week. You'll get the AULRO moderator's discount ;-)

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Dare I suggest the reasons the D3/4 doesn't do CV's and drive shafts is a combination of tyre size (diameter, most only have problems with the Defender CV's once they get past 33" tyres, we won't mention the P38 diff and Sals axles were definitely made from cheddar) sophisticated TC (less shock loading on the drive line) and probably better design and material spec (which wouldn't be hard compared to some of the Deefer stuff, it is crap, and LR have continually downgraded specs over the last twenty five years, the last twelve months capping it off by installing an inferior 2 gear centre diff)
    All that's true, but LR have continually stated that the T5 is the strongest they have ever built, independent of any other factors.

    Cheers

    Gordon

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    3,775
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    Book into the next sand training in Perth - dates should be up next week. You'll get the AULRO moderator's discount ;-)
    Charge Andrew double Gordon for taking the discussion off topic. ...

    ...
    Cheers,
    Terry

    D1 V8 (Gone)
    D2a HSE V8 (Gone)
    D3 HSE TDV6 (Unfortunately Gone)
    D4 V8

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    The T5 Disco 3 / 4 and RRS have the strongest chassis LR have ever built.

    Cheers

    Gordon
    Strongest or stiffest Gordon ?

    Big difference.

    Look at a truck chassis and they have the torsional rigidity of a wet noodle.
    They aren't stiff, but they can cope easily with heavy loads as they are strong.

    I can imagine the T5 chassis is immensely stiff and very strong, lots of FEA would have gone into it, the Deefer chassis was just a deeper section version of the RRC/Disco 1 chassis with stiffening plates added for the 130 which would have been drawn up on a big drawing board 35 years ago.
    It's still pretty strong even though it's only about 2mm wall and probably much stronger than its Japanese competitors that use a much shallower box section.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    450
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My D4 has been on some interesting off road trips. With other vehicles, including Defenders (highly modified ones at that)
    The question "which is better" is clearly subjective to each persons needs.

    Comfort, ease, versatility, reliability and safety the D4 is miles ahead.
    "Real driving", character, repairability with a coat hanger and duct tape the Defender wins.

    If money was no object I'd own one of each. Unfortunately the money Gods (and SWMBO) dictate that 1 capable off-roader is all I can afford, so my $ said the answer was a Disco.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As a repairer of both of these vehicle types from early 110 county to 2015 defenders and first up 2005 d3 all the way to current these are my thoughts... ( sorry if i am not helping here Terry just adding my 2c quickly) I have had a few d3 worked very hard and yes a broken cv or 2 and trashed wheel bearings, EPB siezed cables and ground away shoes, hydro bushes and lower ball joints , transfer case and spline wear, torque converter oil leaks from ground away seal due to sand and mud packed into bellhousing....😮😮, leaking shocks and all rear bushes, twice. and all this on ONE vehicle...😈. I have also seen the same if not worse on many , many defenders . ( minus of course the epb and other non defender issues) my point is that the both of them are capable and tough in their own ways but can still suffer from neglect or abuse causing failure and in many cases huge devaluation.
    My thoughts on chassis strength between the two are that like everything else on a defender hasn't changed much in 35years and still does its job well☺ the D3 and on chassis is so, so strong and shows just what market leading design can do. I don't expect to see any of these corrode away or fail anytime soon. To the 'normal' user the Disco is a highly capable totally sublime offroad performer that is just brilliant on the highway too. The defender is on a different level and is aimed at a different use and demographic but is just at ease on the same tracks most of the time if driven correctly. Me personally?? Everytime I drive a SDV6 D4 i want one. Everytime I drive my 110 i am thankful i alreasy have an iconic vehicle and I'm thankful for that 😅😅

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    5,778
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Dare I suggest the reasons the D3/4 doesn't do CV's and drive shafts is a combination of tyre size (diameter, most only have problems with the Defender CV's once they get past 33" tyres, we won't mention the P38 diff and Sals axles were definitely made from cheddar) sophisticated TC (less shock loading on the drive line) and probably better design and material spec (which wouldn't be hard compared to some of the Deefer stuff, it is crap, and LR have continually downgraded specs over the last twenty five years, the last twelve months capping it off by installing an inferior 2 gear centre diff)
    Im amazed LR has done this. LRs marketing Depts biggest Achilles heal is its reliability (old news) which every reviewer throws into their report.

    So what does LR do, release a My2016 defender that is the pinnacle of that product? No. Revive the unreliability reputation with a 2 pinion diff and iffy gearbox, that LR has worked hard (ie spent millions) to rebuke with a world class product (not perfect by any means) like the D3, D4, Freelander, Evoque, RRS & RRV. Strategically, WTF?
    L322 tdv8 poverty pack - wow
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 49-107 (probably selling) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc.
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 48-699 another project
    Track Trailer ARN 200-117
    REMLR # 137

Page 6 of 115 FirstFirst ... 456781656106 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!