Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 62

Thread: Fuchs oil used in transmission service!

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,744
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoJeffster View Post
    I’m all good for this statement but can you please back this up with the evidence? Please link us to this information so we’re factually informed.
    Well the aftermarket approval list is for ZF class 11A and 11B. If you look at the auto transmission list then the top lines of the "approved lubricants for service fill" for each transmission lists the class. For the 6HP26 there is only LG6 listed with no other lubricant class meaning thats the only approved oil for that trans.
    Shane
    2005 D3 TDV6 loaded to the brim with 4 kids!
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/220914-too-many-defender-write-ups-here-time-d3.html

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Blairgowrie, Vic
    Posts
    1,106
    Total Downloaded
    0

    What is this discussion all about?

    Seems to me it's all about the money.

    It can't be about the application - the ZF requirement for the use of LG6 is clear, and there are no alternatives.
    Now, you could used hand washing liquid in the transmission, but it wouldn't work correctly or for very long. And you probably wouldn't do it anyway, because it's NOT APPROVED

    Pete
    Dizzie, 08 D3 TDV6 SE

  3. #33
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoJeffster View Post
    I’m all good for this statement but can you please back this up with the evidence? Please link us to this information so we’re factually informed.
    What on earth do you mean? The ZF company document specified that only LG6 has type approval.
    That’s pretty simple.

    From a Blenders perspective- one example is Penrite who released a document stating that they could not obtain the required additives as they aren’t released to blenders, and withdrew their offering from the market due to this.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    4,335
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    What on earth do you mean? The ZF company document specified that only LG6 has type approval.
    That’s pretty simple.

    From a Blenders perspective- one example is Penrite who released a document stating that they could not obtain the required additives as they aren’t released to blenders, and withdrew their offering from the market due to this.
    I won’t bother to dignify this statement. It’s pretty clear what I mean. You are making statements that are not founded in fact. The Penrite example is over 5 years old and was true at the time for one company. Just because ZF has not listed an oil as approved, does not mean they are not compatible, it simply means those producers have not paid ZF the exorbitant fees to be “certified”. It’s not like they’re going to do a community interest campaign and certify other brand oils in the market out of their charitable heart and eat into their lucrative oil business is it?

    Anyhow, use LG6, don’t. Each to their own.
    2010 TDV6 3.0L Discovery 4 HSE
    2007 Audi RS4 (B7)

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    For the sake of $100 or so every 2-5 years, why would you risk it ?
    Out of interest how close is the ford box to the ZF, what other products has Ford approval for use in their trans ?
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    899
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interesting thread on the Mannol alternative (?) on the UK site: DISCO3.CO.UK - View topic - ZF8 and ZF6 Compatible ATF For D3 & D4

    Not ZF certified but some reputable members there using it and no adverse effects reported.

    For me, for now, I'll stick to LG8 rather than risk any issues potentially being linked to non-compliance but agree - each to their own.

    David
    Everything is easy when someone else is doing it
    MY14 SDV6 SE Corris Grey
    Compomotive 18s : D697s : Traxide DBS : LLAMS : ARB compressor : IC-455
    Rhino Platform : GOE compressor, Tx & front bash plates, deluxe sliders

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    286
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You guys seem to not understand Business 101.

    ZF makes gearbox
    ZF makes oil for gearbox
    ZF provides approvals for third party oil for gearbox
    ZF doesn't approve any of the third party oil for gearbox
    ZF makes $$$

    Simples.

  8. #38
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoJeffster View Post
    I won’t bother to dignify this statement. It’s pretty clear what I mean. You are making statements that are not founded in fact. The Penrite example is over 5 years old and was true at the time for one company. Just because ZF has not listed an oil as approved, does not mean they are not compatible, it simply means those producers have not paid ZF the exorbitant fees to be “certified”. It’s not like they’re going to do a community interest campaign and certify other brand oils in the market out of their charitable heart and eat into their lucrative oil business is it?

    Anyhow, use LG6, don’t. Each to their own.
    Not founded in fact? How so?

    ZF have regularly issued compatibility notations for fluids.
    In this application they have not done so, and yet ANY oil blender that bothered to have one certified would recoup their investment rapidly.

    Where are your “facts”? How exorbitant are these certifications? Do you have the numbers in front of you?
    Are you sure just how much margin is in their oil? Or what their R&D outlay was?

    No you don’t - and neither do I...

    What we do know - those who have tried other fluids report slightly different behaviour from the box. Replacement with the LG6 returning it back to its original operation.

    What we don’t know - even with other fluids performing adequately for the user - is what impact this may be having on linings etc in the box - and very few people are onto box number 3 yet so how do we know if the impact is shortened product life?

    All for a $100....

  9. #39
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by specwarop View Post
    You guys seem to not understand Business 101.

    ZF makes gearbox
    ZF makes oil for gearbox
    ZF provides approvals for third party oil for gearbox
    ZF doesn't approve any of the third party oil for gearbox
    ZF makes $$$

    Simples.
    Agree, IP is the money maker...

    And why wouldn’t somebody hold onto their IP.

    ZF won’t release the additive pack they developed to Blenders - so unless the Blender reverse engineers it adequately- and then backs the product as 100% compatible it would be a risk.

    So far, no alternative fluid has performed the same as the LG6 by all accounts. And there has been no substantiated long term reports on longevity of the boxes running other fluids.

    Heck, no oil blender has even tried to match the fluids in the Locking diff etc.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Warwick Qld
    Posts
    1,977
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The price you pay for LG6 or 8 is NOT the price ZF is selling it at! Look at the wide range of prices it retails at from different sellers.
    Business 101 would tell you that by the time it got to say Repco for example, it has gone through a significant number of hands - each one adding it's own profit margin.
    I also doubt very much that ZF makes the oils themselves. They would have undoubtedly had input into the additive package, but would have an agreement with an oil supplier to make and package the product.
    Millions of 4 speed ZF boxes out there, and they're happy to recommend almost anything that meets Dexron 2 or 3 certification for them.
    -----
    You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    -----

    1999 Disco TD5 ("Bluey")
    1996 Disco 300 TDi ("Slo-Mo")
    1995 P38A 4.6 HSE ("The Limo")
    1966 No 5 Trailer (ARN 173 075) soon to be camper
    -----

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!