Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 68

Thread: 18in tyres for Disco4

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    466
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BrianElloy View Post
    Went from K02’s to D697’s and love them. I found the K02’s tough but agricultural and noisy for such a refined car. Found the 697’s way quieter and for what I do, just as capable off road. Will definitely be buying them again.
    Yep totally agree on all points same experience here.

    If you reckon a 697 moans then DO NOT buy the KO2 a measurable dB noisier for sure. But as Brian has said a great tyre when you are doing a lot of off bitumen travel. We tow and AOR Q+ and average >20,000km off bitumen each year and the KO2 certainly work better but only marginally and you would need to do the sort of km's we're doing to actually justify the additional cost in my view

    Rob
    Rob

    MY15 TDV6. Compomotives with KO2's, Traxide 160-DBMS, Llams, OE bar, custom rear storage slide, Rhino roof storage system, LSM TPMS, ICOM 440N, rear ladder and GOE compressor guard

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0

    ible

    It looks as if LT spec is dying in the typical size of 265/60R18 for our D3/RRS - trying to get LT AT tyres in that size and it is almost impossible. Yes the BFGs are LT but at around $400 are just too expensive - I can get Bridgestone 697s for $305 but are they really LT with a load rating of 114? The dealers say yes they are LT but the LT does not appear in the tyre spec like the BFGs do. 114 is a bit light for a LT in that size - but when I quizz the dealer on sidewall construction etc the shutters just come down and they quote the 114 load rating.

    Toyo AT2 in that size are only Passenger as are Hankook RF10s - not interested in Coopers.

    The other tyre is the Nitto Terra Grappler G2 which the dealers say is LT because it has a load rating of 114 - the logic is a bit the same as Bridgestone - if load rating is 114 or above it is LT if it is below 112 it is passenger. These are $261 - so any recommendations?

    So anyone know of another 265/60R18 LT tyre that is OK and reasonably priced.

    If not, I might go the Nittos.

    thanks

    garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,479
    Total Downloaded
    37.36 MB
    I'm in the same boat as you Garry. I would like to replace the D697's on my D3 in the next month or two, but can't get anyone to definitively give me an answer on what is a true LT tyre in the 265/60/18 size.
    Life is just a series of obstacles preventing you from taking a nap.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Ranelagh, Tasmania
    Posts
    1,543
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    It looks as if LT spec is dying in the typical size of 265/60R18 for our D3/RRS - trying to get LT AT tyres in that size and it is almost impossible. Yes the BFGs are LT but at around $400 are just too expensive - I can get Bridgestone 697s for $305 but are they really LT with a load rating of 114? The dealers say yes they are LT but the LT does not appear in the tyre spec like the BFGs do. 114 is a bit light for a LT in that size - but when I quizz the dealer on sidewall construction etc the shutters just come down and they quote the 114 load rating.

    Toyo AT2 in that size are only Passenger as are Hankook RF10s - not interested in Coopers.

    The other tyre is the Nitto Terra Grappler G2 which the dealers say is LT because it has a load rating of 114 - the logic is a bit the same as Bridgestone - if load rating is 114 or above it is LT if it is below 112 it is passenger. These are $261 - so any recommendations?

    So anyone know of another 265/60R18 LT tyre that is OK and reasonably priced.

    If not, I might go the Nittos.

    thanks

    garry

    The Bridgestone site shows the 265 60 18 D697 as LT. There is also a 285 60 18 LT.
    Fuji white RRS L494 AB Gone
    2023 Ford Ranga

  5. #15
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by cripesamighty View Post
    I'm in the same boat as you Garry. I would like to replace the D697's on my D3 in the next month or two, but can't get anyone to definitively give me an answer on what is a true LT tyre in the 265/60/18 size.
    I’ve done a bit of tech investigating on this also..

    And found out that some XL tyres are actually a stronger carcass and construction than the LT construction.

    The D697 is a true LT..

    I’m unsure what all this BS about the number of LT tyres is decreasing, it’s actually increasing!

    My next set will be Falken AT3Ws. An XL tyre that more than meets my requirements of a heavy duty tyre.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,916
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TuffRR View Post
    My experience with the Bridgestones have been atrocious off-road. ...
    Can't say I've had the same experience.

    On the one set of Bridgestone D697s I have done the GR road, the Canning Stock Route, the Simpson desert, The Anne Beadle Hyw, The Flinders Ranges, the Bungle Bungles as well as trips out around the Kennedy Ranges, Mt Augusta, Karijini and so forth. I've had a couple of slow leaks (ie going down overnight) but they have been due to a tec screw (probably picked up in my driveway) or sand in the beads due to low pressure beach driving.

    After ~50k over 4 years they are getting down on rubber now and will need replacing within the next 12 months but I will be replacing them with the same.
    2024 RRS on the road
    2011 D4 3.0 in the drive way
    1999 D2 V8, in heaven
    1984 RRC, in hell

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post

    The D697 is a true LT..

    I’m unsure what all this BS about the number of LT tyres is decreasing, it’s actually increasing!
    Ok other than the D679s and BFG KO2s what other LT (proper LT) tyres are there in 265/60R18 size??

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Geedublya View Post
    The Bridgestone site shows the 265 60 18 D697 as LT.
    Yes I appreciate they say that but their load rating is only 114 the same as some passenger grade tyres - eg the Nittos. The BFG KOs have thicker sidewalls than the D697s - in ply terms. The KOs are 3 ply side walls but the D697s only have 2 ply sidewalls but they do say they are thicker so I guess thicker rubber without the plys.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  9. #19
    Tombie Guest
    The Nitto are XL not P...

    It’s a confusing world!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Yes I appreciate they say that but their load rating is only 114 the same as some passenger grade tyres - eg the Nittos. The BFG KOs have thicker sidewalls than the D697s - in ply terms. The KOs are 3 ply side walls but the D697s only have 2 ply sidewalls but they do say they are thicker so I guess thicker rubber without the plys.

    Cheers

    Garry
    Bridgestone used to claim that their sidewall plies were 1500 denier vs 1000 denier for BFG, therefore at least 'equaling' BFG in sidewall strength.
    I don't know if this is still the case.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!