Thread: D4 vs RRS (L320) width

The L320 was based on the D3 and online info gives it as being about 94mm narrower - but is it actually that much narrower?

Wouldn't that mean that the D3/D4's body pan and suspension couldn't be carried over?


First generation (L320; 2005–2013)

First generation (L320)
Wheelbase	108.1 in (2,745 mm)
Length	2005–2009: 186.5 in (4,737 mm) Since 2009: 188.3 in (4,783 mm)
Width	2005–2009: 75.9 in (1,928 mm) Since 2009: 76.1 in (1,933 mm)
Height	71.5 in (1,816 mm)

Discovery 4 / LR4 (2009–2016)

Discovery 4 (L319)
Wheelbase	2,885 mm (113.6 in)
Length	4,838 mm (190.5 in)
Width	2,022 mm (79.6 in) (mirrors folded)
Height	1,970 mm (77.6 in) (including roof rails)

Originally Posted by Arapiles

... the reason I ask is that my wife has been driving the D4 instead of her own car but is finding the width a bit intimidating in the inner City, so maybe an L320 could be an option.

It’s more illusion than anything. The squarer profile of the Disco just seems bigger.

The RRS slopes away more, actually harder to physically see the extremities.