Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Proof of Active Locking Rear Differential

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,545
    Total Downloaded
    0

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Dalby
    Posts
    4,011
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Inside they're great videos. Really shows off the systems.

  3. #13
    Wilco Guest
    Further to Gordon's link to a site showing images of the Electronic active rear diff I have managed to take a photo of my rear diff (attached) showing the solenoid.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Great videos Andrew.

    I do have a question though, or at least an observation:

    In the D3 vid the instructor talks about the need for the diff lock to engage to move forward once two wheels have left the ground. He also talks about the air suspension.

    In the FL vid the instructor advises there's no diff lock or air suspension, and then demonstrates how the traction control will get the FL through.

    Thing is, the D3 has traction control, so what was proven in the demo?

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    1,368
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteD3 View Post
    Great videos Andrew.

    I do have a question though, or at least an observation:

    In the D3 vid the instructor talks about the need for the diff lock to engage to move forward once two wheels have left the ground. He also talks about the air suspension.

    In the FL vid the instructor advises there's no diff lock or air suspension, and then demonstrates how the traction control will get the FL through.

    Thing is, the D3 has traction control, so what was proven in the demo?
    I wondered the same thing. I've seen videos of the D3 doing the same thing the FL2 rear wheel did (stop start stop start etc).

    Lets look for somewhere tomorrow Mark and do a little
    experiment - I'm guessing you don't have the active rear diff?
    06 SE V6 Discovery 3

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by djhampson View Post
    I'm guessing you don't have the active rear diff?
    An oversight on my part

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    RichardK and I have taken our (almost identical) D3's over the same ground - mine with the locking diff, his without, and you struggle to find any difference in the cars' performances on all but the most extreme rock-climbs. The std traction control is (in most situations) just as competent at controlling a spinning wheel as is the locking diff. In "rock-crawl" it's much more effective than the FL2.

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    RichardK and I have taken our (almost identical) D3's over the same ground - mine with the locking diff, his without, and you struggle to find any difference in the cars' performances on all but the most extreme rock-climbs.
    This confirms what I have read elsewhere. The active rear diff's benefits are rarely noticed in the D3 due to the traction control.

    Quote Originally Posted by gghaggis View Post
    The std traction control is (in most situations) just as competent at controlling a spinning wheel as is the locking diff. In "rock-crawl" it's much more effective than the FL2.
    I would think the advantage in rock crawl is purely down to the air suspension (clearance) and low range of the D3 and not related to traction control at all?

    Keeping in mind that this is the D3 Zone is it reasonable to come to the conclusion that the traction control and comparable performances of the D3 and FL2 is equal when you compare traction alone regardless of active diff locks?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    2,248
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The system response times vary in the different TR settings. The TC is at its most aggressive settings in "rock-crawl", least aggressive in "sand".

    As the FL doesn't have "rock-crawl", it wouldn't lock up as fast. And of course, not having low-range, as you said!

    Cheers,

    Gordon

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Anyone know why they don't have this for the front as well

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!