Page 56 of 97 FirstFirst ... 646545556575866 ... LastLast
Results 551 to 560 of 962

Thread: Disappointed in the D5 / waiting for the Defender

  1. #551
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0

  2. #552
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tact View Post
    Gotta call you out on that comment, just for accuracy - not claiming this one detail makes much difference to the weird discussion.

    Defender stock is 235/85R16 (~31.73”). My Defender is running 255/85R16 (smidge over 33”) and all I had to do was take the old rubber off the stock rims and fit the new rubber.

    i.e. No spacers, no rim change, no susp lift, no body lift, no cutting or shunting and no rubbing.

    Can it it be any more simple!?

    Whats the stock size tyres and rims on the ‘rok? What changes did you have to make to fit 33” tyres?
    Okay. A Rok needs non std rims and a front lift or front mudflap trim or removal.

  3. #553
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey Rammy, everyone has different priorities. It's great to hear you're loving your Rok, they're a nice car and certainly very capable in certain circumstances.

    Whether it's a viable alternative to Defender is an interesting question...they are entirely different vehicles. My experience is that the Amarok is not an alternative to a Defender.

    As I mentioned earlier, I tried an Amarok for two years (in between owning two Defenders). ...I didn't like it and upgraded to a new Defender in 2014. I haven't regretted my decision for a second. ...They are like chalk and cheese to me. Defender is easily more robust and durable IMO.

    It's not all about cross-axle capability, but it's pretty clear to me that Defender is more capable without modification. My 2014 Defender is stock except for upgrading the shocks to Koni's for durability reasons on severe corrugations over many years. I find the Defender heaps better off road than the Amarok for my purposes.

    I also much prefer the interior of the Defender over the car-like interior of the Amarok...for so many reasons, not least the upright super supportive seating position and four corner visibility...

    Cheers

  4. #554
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,380
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rammypluge View Post
    Okay. A Rok needs non std rims and a front lift or front mudflap trim or removal.
    ahh... caught out with the boast that it was easy, and that it’s not easy on a Defender. Both assertions patently untrue.

    So the ‘rok needs mods to fit 33” tyres to get anywhere in the challenging stuff. Better allow a Defender a mod like a rear locker to even the score.

    Now try and convince anyone your modern ‘rok (with 33”s) can beat a modern Defender (with rear locker) in any off-road situation!
    Neil
    (Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
    MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
    Nulla tenaci invia est via

  5. #555
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0

  6. #556
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tact View Post
    ahh... caught out with the boast that it was easy, and that it’s not easy on a Defender. Both assertions patently untrue.

    So the ‘rok needs mods to fit 33” tyres to get anywhere in the challenging stuff. Better allow a Defender a mod like a rear locker to even the score.

    Now try and convince anyone your modern ‘rok (with 33”s) can beat a modern Defender (with rear locker) in any off-road situation!
    No, i said it was easy to fit 33" on the Rok, and not easy to fit bigger than 33" on a defender.

    Fitting a rear locker to an otherwise standard Puma will make it closer to my Roks capabilities, but with only 32" tyres, diggy diffs, and unladen with stiff coils and anti-roll bars, it would still lose out a bit. It might have more ramp over, definitely better sill clearance, fully locked centre unlike auto rok, better reverse drive than an auto rok, but not much else.

    If you were planning to go into the high country with a trailer you would want a manual Rok over the auto Rok.

    My rok would still kill it in ruts, all sandy conditions, and on tarmac.

  7. #557
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've never replaced a CV on my Defender in more than 15 years.

  8. #558
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeros View Post
    I've never replaced a CV on my Defender in more than 15 years.
    Okay, show me some videos of you working it hard!

    Having fun at The Coorong - YouTube

  9. #559
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Nice hard sand...

    Looks like my D2 4.6 when I'm running late for the barge...only I'm doing it in more style with a sound show to match Disappointed in the D5 / waiting for the DefenderDisappointed in the D5 / waiting for the Defender

  10. #560
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rammypluge View Post
    Okay, show me some videos of you working it hard!

    Having fun at The Coorong - YouTube
    bro, I was 'working it hard' when VHS was the preferred format...no phone cameras. I don't bother videoing the deefer in action these days. ...too busy and nothing to prove. ...go well.

Page 56 of 97 FirstFirst ... 646545556575866 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!