Page 57 of 97 FirstFirst ... 747555657585967 ... LastLast
Results 561 to 570 of 962

Thread: Disappointed in the D5 / waiting for the Defender

  1. #561
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    AU
    Posts
    764
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Nice hard sand...

    Looks like my D2 4.6 when I'm running late for the barge...only I'm doing it in more style with a sound show to match Disappointed in the D5 / waiting for the DefenderDisappointed in the D5 / waiting for the Defender
    Disappointed in the D5 / waiting for the Defender See, thats how good it is, it makes 13psi sand look hard Disappointed in the D5 / waiting for the Defender.

  2. #562
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Woolgoolga
    Posts
    7,870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hardly cv breaking material there.

    Also you can fit 35's on a defender with nothing more than a 2" lift.

  3. #563
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The interior looks good apart from inadequate space in the rear, but the outside is pig ugly. The fact that the HSE is also made from Unobtanium at $143 odd K optioned up. The mid range 4x4 has now become an elitist vehicle (though I guess this did start with the D4). At least in D1 and D2 incarnation the average person could afford the top of the range. Will in all honesty likely mean I never buy a new Land Rover again, maybe a second hand one at best.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  4. #564
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Woolgoolga
    Posts
    7,870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by CraigE View Post
    The interior looks good apart from inadequate space in the rear, but the outside is pig ugly. The fact that the HSE is also made from Unobtanium at $143 odd K optioned up. The mid range 4x4 has now become an elitist vehicle (though I guess this did start with the D4). At least in D1 and D2 incarnation the average person could afford the top of the range. Will in all honesty likely mean I never buy a new Land Rover again, maybe a second hand one at best.
    Top of the range d1 was around $80k! Back in 1994! Not much difference to todays rate of $143k

  5. #565
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Perth, AU
    Posts
    1,002
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I bought a second hand machine - and love it. Let someone else cop the worst of the depreciation I say!

    Not sure what the Defender vs Amarok "mine is bigger than yours" discussion has to do with the Discovery 5?
    2010 TDV6 3.0L Discovery 4 SE remapped to RRS output, Alaska White, GME XRS-330c, IIDTool BT, Dual Battery, Apple CarPlay, OEM Retrofitted: Cornering lights, Door card lights, Power + Heated Seats, Logic 7 audio

  6. #566
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Woolgoolga
    Posts
    7,870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by veebs View Post
    I bought a second hand machine - and love it. Let someone else cop the worst of the depreciation I say!

    Not sure what the Defender vs Amarok "mine is bigger than yours" discussion has to do with the Discovery 5?
    And particularly when comparing a stock car vs a modified!

  7. #567
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Vern View Post
    Top of the range d1 was around $80k! Back in 1994! Not much difference to todays rate of $143k
    Well a mid range SE model in 97 was $42 now over $100k so has more than doubled in 20 years. In 1994 the most expensive D1 was $65k, a Tdi SE was $44k in 94. The odd thing is they actually got cheaper by 97. I bought an SE in 1997 brand new optioned up for $42 on road total, including bull bar, tow bar, snorkel, mats and a few other items. In the D1 I don't remember there being a HSE. 1997 SE was $42k RRP, SE7 was $51K, Rossignal $57k, ES (no HSE) $65 but you could easily get these on road for same if not better and LR extras added. The P38 Range Rover in base was only $99 then and just over $114 for the HSE and $149 for the Autobiography. These were all 1997 update prices.

    Even more surprising was the most expensive D2 in 2000 was $67k but as low as $46k for a TD5 manual.
    The most expensive D2 update in 2004 was just on $80 and that is maybe what you are thinking of and that was a HSE ( from memory HSE in the Disco only came in with the D2 update). But as low as $52 for base models.

    Of course these were RRP and you could get much better deals on them, in 97 you could even get the V8 for around $38k (what I was offered in a SE7).

    You say not much of an increase, well over 10 years D1 & D2 around $15k in the top of the range. In 12 years between 2005 D2 to D5 in 2017 a $63k increase and you reckon that is OK

    I do get the vehicle is much more technologically advanced, but still its a massive price leap for what was a mid point 4x4.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  8. #568
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rammypluge View Post
    Amorok Sorry we have one as a track response car and in all honesty one of the biggest POS's I have ever driven. Gutless and uncomfortable. Was very disappointed to say the least after hearing all the hype about these. My TD5 Defender can get off the line much quicker. To do a motor race chase you have to rev it to 4000rpm to even get it off the line at a half decent launch pace and then within milli seconds hit 5000rpm and have to change gear with massive lag. I can get a loaded Fallcon Ute with 500 litres of water and a Land Cruser V8 ute with 500litres of water plus cutting gear and CAFFS unit of the line much faster. Off road the Rok is pretty average.
    You cannot seriously compare a Rok with a Defender. The Defender any model will walk all over the Rok offroad any day without any mods.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  9. #569
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Woolgoolga
    Posts
    7,870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My old d1 ES tdi had $72k price tag on it according to the books i had. And it wasn't anywhere near as flash as a d2/3/4/5 or even a range rover at the time.

  10. #570
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm still trying to get my head around comparing a vehicle from the 80's without a locking diff in sight and suspension set up for the client to carry loads, vs a modified new vehicle?

    Purchase justification anyone?

    My old Deefer had 10" of travel in the front at the bump stops and it was only slightly higher than stock ride height without too much modification, I can't see a Rok achieving anything like that sort of articulation in a hurry without some serious reengineering.
    It also carried a constant work load of around 7-800kg its entire working life, often at silly speeds speeds over indifferent roads.

    The Deefer also outshone our then new GU Patrol coil ute on the farm, and was more comfortable, had better if minimalist seats, a better driving position but a cramped cab, yet on a trip the GU was so much quieter and had modern creature comforts, I wonder if I can sure Land Rover for my tinnitus?? (Joking!)
    Swings and merry go rounds...

    We all know the faults of the 90/110/130, we've discussed them ad nauseum and Land Rovers failure to address basic engineering issues over the years, but one area they've shone is off road, and as the years progressed at least Land Rover kept them current with excellent T/C although articulation had been comprised with anti-roll bars, and such a shame lockers were never an option from the factory....

    Have to get back to work...

Page 57 of 97 FirstFirst ... 747555657585967 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!