Aluminium don't you mean [emoji6][emoji23]
Printable View
Half the expected problems are, unfortunately, likely going to be EXACTLY that, software needs for updates. Sadly a modern vehicle doesn't seem able to tske one into the bush, stay offline and maintain an avility to operate properly. Give me basic, old school simple with a few modern conveniences rather than necessities and I'll line front of any waitlist. Since that won't be the offer I'll instead wait to see.
I am thinking that the only people that will buy the new defender will be Landrover the "tragic's" and I highly doubt that it will win any of the Toyota/Nissan buyers over.
None of the current JLR products can honestly be considered as hard core off road machines, They are simply luxury SUV's and the majority of them will never see much off road work.
IF the new defender continues down this path I can't see it being successful in the Australian market.
I own a 2.2 Ranger c/c , a 130 in disguise , with zero faults and problems , obviously for the past 15 odd years , you and I have been on completely different Aulro forums.
I'm on the one where there has been thousands of regular complaints about every Land Rover model where there is pathetic back up from dealers and LR itself. I owned a D2 for 8 years, one ****ing thing after another. Why do you think I bought the Ranger?
Yep and D2 has a better build than Puma. Look I am a big fan of D2; Deefer and RRC BUT they have their 'preventative maintenance' requirements that a lot of other brands don't need to the same degree.I am happy to deal with that as they are easy to work on and don't let you down if you preempt issues and they are an unbeatable package on and off road. But let's not look through rose colored glasses.
Cheers
I should add...it never let me down.