Page 177 of 451 FirstFirst ... 77127167175176177178179187227277 ... LastLast
Results 1,761 to 1,770 of 4508

Thread: Won’t be retro...

  1. #1761
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LRJim View Post
    I agree, I wasnt born with x-ray vision either Won’t be retro...
    The camo consists of a wrap and some duct tape, thats about it. All these hidden lines are non existent, just imaginary.
    What you see now isnt going to be much different to the finished product.
    If you say so, all good

  2. #1762
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ramblingboy42 View Post
    I cannot see the necessity for anyone to pay anyone else here respect.

    am I wrong in this?
    Yes, its forum rules

  3. #1763
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ramblingboy42 View Post
    no, sorry, scroll back lazy
    Sure, will try to next time if that makes it easier for you Won’t be retro...

  4. #1764
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    Yes, its forum rules
    ...yes you are corrrect

    ....but when it's due, not every time someone disagrees with your constant barrage of unsubstantiated fantasies.

    ....I hope you don't become admin.

  5. #1765
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ramblingboy42 View Post
    ...yes you are corrrect

    ....but when it's due, not every time someone disagrees with your constant barrage of unsubstantiated fantasies.

    ....I hope you don't become admin.
    Others actions should not be the the deciding factor as to when we show respect to others.

    Rules don't say, "only show respect to other users if you agree with them"

    Then there is also common decency.

    People being disrespectful in jokes or for real is not disagreeing.

    I don't mind what people agree with or don't, i just put up what i think are facts, people can think what they want to think.

    Lets all keep this respectful, back to the new defender. Won’t be retro...

  6. #1766
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Rover
    Posts
    1,936
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well you started calling me a Troll! when I disagreed with you!

    Frankly and without humour this time, you don’t own the thread. You’re not the official arbiter or coordinator of all discussion relating to the new Defender and you’re not on the JLR marketing team (as far as I know).

  7. #1767
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    Redesdale
    Posts
    1,524
    Total Downloaded
    0

  8. #1768
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Zeros View Post
    Well you started calling me a Troll! when I disagreed with you!


    Mate Zero, take a chill this is a forum, we are talking about the new defender, its life or death or a competition. To my knowledge i haven't called you a troll, I try very hard to not return rudeness or disrespect when I'm on the receiving end.

    If you feel somehow I called you a troll, (which trolling FYI is also against forum rules) then I apologize if you were not trolling at the time. Won’t be retro...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zeros View Post
    Frankly and without humour this time, you don’t own the thread. You’re not the official arbiter or coordinator of all discussion relating to the new Defender and you’re not on the JLR marketing team (as far as I know).
    In your last post to me it felt like you were sugercoating disrespect and rudeness under the guise of humour (this is also against forum rules) You can take that feedback onboard if you like or not, that's just how I felt.

    In this post I feel like you change it up to be more direct, which is pretty much a directed personal attack(also against forum rules).

    Zero your comments regarding my "position" on this thread are really quite astounding, its an internet forum, last thing i want in life is to climb the ladder on a forum Won’t be retro....

    If others would like to collect all JLR on record quotes, post links to articles, factually analyse information we have against photos and comments, no problems, it is warmly welcomed, it would make life much easier for the ones the put effort in for no gain other than to help other members that are as genuinely exited as they are.

    On the other hand there just a small few that never post up any info rather sit back and with a nearly 100% strike rate, are unnecessarily negative or provacative about what is posted.Why? Are they afraid that the new defender could possibly be better than a vehicle that they think is number 1? Opinions are opinions and that's fine as long as they are balanced, factual and respectful

    If these ones have a legitimate problem with anything posted, respectfully say so remembering the selfless effort it takes to put it up in the first place. It also takes effort to be respectfull, on the other hand if they are never adding any positive value, always being provocative and rarely positive or respectfull, this is infact the very definition of trolling.

    Just like when people make baseless comments about newer LRs or the old defenders being rubbish, others will show the facts that prove otherwise.

    If people disregard forum rules, they will be called out. The rules are designed to avoid the need for timewasting posts like these. If you think that makes the people that do those things an arbitrator, no worries. However from what i have seen most of the work to combat this is done behind the scenes by the mods. The more respectful we are to eachother the less work the mods have to do, everyone's happy.

    Toyotas are great in their own way, Landrovers are great in their own way, shall we move on to the new defender, which is what we are here for.

    Note to self: Contact JLR for the latest marketing info to drop here, and Rivian and Grenadier, stoked to be working for all 3 Won’t be retro...Won’t be retro...Won’t be retro...

  9. #1769
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LRJim View Post
    Yeah looks like they are going to get a straight 6 petrol and diesel too.

    Apparently they have a mule out somewhere.

    Its very hard to build a 4x4 from scratch, let alone sell and support it around the world, Will be very interesting to see what he comes up with.

    A few threads on this already i think but all g Won’t be retro...

  10. #1770
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    3,394
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Finally some video of the Nurburgring testing of the new Defender.

    YouTube

    Pistonheads are saying its the new inline 6 being tested, tend to agree, not an 8, to quick for the 4 and sounds smoother , that leaves the new ingenium straight 6 turbo'd and supercharged. Won’t be retro...

    Land Rover Defender tests with inline-six: Video! | PistonHeads

    Looks like an animal!
    Long travel and wallows around but corners ok somehow gets to a certain point then just stops rolling.
    Maybe shocks get stiffer as needed + the pressure from the crosslinked air springs fighting against bodyroll or something.

    Impressive when the road changes camber, also at 20 seconds in you can hear the engine if you turn it up loud.

Page 177 of 451 FirstFirst ... 77127167175176177178179187227277 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!