Page 265 of 451 FirstFirst ... 165215255263264265266267275315365 ... LastLast
Results 2,641 to 2,650 of 4508

Thread: Won’t be retro...

  1. #2641
    DiscoMick Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by grey_ghost View Post
    I figure why drive a big car when I really don’t need it. I don’t know yet - but I hope that a 90 is cheaper? Lighter? Slightly more fuel efficient?

    I never carry passengers - maybe once a year.

    If I need to - then I can use the D1, RRC or Freelander...
    Maybe a Defender Sport for you?

  2. #2642
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoClax View Post
    There is no way that the new Defo is D4-based in any way. The D4 is on a lightly reworked D3 platform which was an older body-on-frame arrangement (itself derived from Explorer during the Ford tenure) which has now been obsoleted by LR (D4 being the last using it), where the new Defo is part of the new architecture underpinning FFRR/D5/RRS/etc. It is an aluminium-intensive monocoque modular platform. Of this there really is no doubt as LR have officially confirmed repeatedly and the myriad of pictures of the pilots confirm.
    From an opinion perspective... To me I'd agree that dimensionally it looks to be approximately D4 sized, but with improved 'boxiness' and probably a bit more track (hence the flared guards). The new Defo just couldn't be sold competitively at the old Defo's interior width. LR had to widen it significantly for the new range of customers. Nowadays people want their elbows inside the cab - especially true for 'robustly-framed' Americans which is a key market - and crash requirements drive a degree of greater door thickness which adds to exterior width.
    I'm guessing there'd be a fair degree of commonality of componentry with the D5, upper wishbones, maybe lowers (although the bags I think are different) probably diffs, driveshafts, toe rods, tie rods, etc.
    You have a far better idea than me but I can't see it being viable to design and build 'orphan' components for a 'new' platform, so....

    Anyone have the numbers for the track of the D5?
    That might have some clues.

  3. #2643
    SBD4's Avatar
    SBD4 is offline A Keeper of the TGO Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bundeena
    Posts
    2,809
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Anyone have the numbers for the track of the D5?
    That might have some clues.
    D5 & RRS:

    Track Front 1692mm
    Track Rear 1687mm
    Wheelbase 2923mm
    Cheers,

    Sean

    “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” - Albert Einstein

  4. #2644
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    I'm guessing there'd be a fair degree of commonality of componentry with the D5, upper wishbones, maybe lowers (although the bags I think are different) probably diffs, driveshafts, toe rods, tie rods, etc.
    You have a far better idea than me but I can't see it being viable to design and build 'orphan' components for a 'new' platform, so....

    Anyone have the numbers for the track of the D5?
    That might have some clues.
    Might it not logically be the first model on the new platform, and hence likely to be mostly all new components except where it really makes sense to keep the old part long term? Rather than simply being the last model based on the old platform?

    Same way that, for example, the Rangerover, while clearly inheriting a lot of design solutions from the Series Landrover, had very few common parts.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #2645
    DiscoMick Guest
    Watching several of the YouTube clips, I noticed two things:

    One vehicle had an exhaust on each side with a single tank between. The other had both exhausts on the left and what appeared to be a single tank on the right. Might one be the hybrid?

    One of the reports predicted a base model US price of about US$50k, so maybe that could mean an Aussie price from about $60k.

    Just speculation, of course.

  6. #2646
    Ean Austral Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    Watching several of the YouTube clips, I noticed two things:

    One vehicle had an exhaust on each side with a single tank between. The other had both exhausts on the left and what appeared to be a single tank on the right. Might one be the hybrid?

    One of the reports predicted a base model US price of about US$50k, so maybe that could mean an Aussie price from about $60k.

    Just speculation, of course.
    Can you let me know where you are getting such a good exchange rate , I need to get some stuff for work and have to pay in USD.

    Cheers Ean

  7. #2647
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Might it not logically be the first model on the new platform, and hence likely to be mostly all new components except where it really makes sense to keep the old part long term? Rather than simply being the last model based on the old platform?

    Same way that, for example, the Rangerover, while clearly inheriting a lot of design solutions from the Series Landrover, had very few common parts.

    Maybe, I was just basing it on what's happened in the past, eg the 90/110 was an entire RRC driveline.
    Is the D5 the last of the platform?
    I haven't been paying too much attention.

  8. #2648
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm pretty sure they said all new cars from 2020 will be on the new MLA platform, and I assumed that the delay in the new Defender was because it would be the first on the new platform. The long delay would hardly make sense otherwise. If it were based on an existing platform surely it would have been testing well before these pilots appeared.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #2649
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Wandong,Victoria,Australia
    Posts
    3,379
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    Maybe a Defender Sport for you?
    Yep - that’s what I am thinking (without know the specs yet)
    88 Perentie FFR - Club Rego
    93 Discovery 1 200 Tdi - Club Rego
    03 130 Td5 Single Cab
    06 Discovery 3 Petrol
    22 Defender 90 - Full rego

  10. #2650
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Torres Straits
    Posts
    3,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This totally blows me away;

    D5 & RRS:

    Track Front 1692mm
    Track Rear 1687mm
    Wheelbase. 2923mm

    200 series

    Track Front 1640mm
    Track Rear 1635mm
    Wheelbase. 2850mm


    I was giving a D5 a sticky beak in the car park at the beach yesterday
    It just “looks” smaller than it actually measures
    I guess that makes it good design to make it look smaller than it is?

    Interesting !

    S
    '95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
    '10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)

Page 265 of 451 FirstFirst ... 165215255263264265266267275315365 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!