And who remembers the days when you just took your can to BP, and filled it with Zoom25...![]()
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
And who remembers the days when you just took your can to BP, and filled it with Zoom25...![]()
Maybe oils have changed and engine technology has changed, but there used to be a simple reason why two strokes produced more power with more oil.
Extra oil made the fuel a bit thicker so that it was harder for it to flow through the main jet. That leaned out the mixture. Two strokes depended on the air/fuel mixture for part of the cooling, so needed to run a richer than optimum mixture to avoid overheating.
So adding extra oil gave a leaner mixture and more power until the engine began to lose power through overheating which made the air/fuel mixture in the crankcase less dense; the opposite effect to running an intercooler.
If pushed hard enough with too much oil, the engine would seize from overheating.
If the carby was jetted correctly for the thicker fuel mix, it would happily run the oily fuel, but if it was jetted for a mix with very little oil, adding more oil could make it seize.
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
Years ago, I had a moment of brain fade as I was filling up my Hodaka 100. I realised when I noticed vehicles getting lost in the smoke cloud behind me at the traffic lights, that I had added double the required amount of oil.
Since it usually ran 20:1 and the tank was almost empty before the fill, it must have been close to 10:1.
It seemed to be running quite happily apart from the embarrassing cloud of smoke.
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
The main reason a richer mix works is better ring seal.
Air cooled engines have looser clearances to allow for expansion so this is where the richer mix helps (as it also did with karts spinning to 21,000RPM. Skirt seizure and little end failure was a real danger)
Water cooled engines with their tighter clearances just don't need the richer mix.
All the two strokes i've run (karts and saws) use simple adjustable carbies which makes tuning a snap (if you know what you're doing)
Like so many things, there are probably a number of factors involved.
If better ring sealing was the only effect, that would not explain why engines could seize with too much oil in the fuel.
My experience with two strokes was in the 1970s and the scramblers and short circuit bikes I was familiar with did about half the revs of the engines you are describing.![]()
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
You're right when you say that the richer oil/fuel mix effectively leans the engine out without retuning.
That's why I mentioned karts, as unlike a Mikuni bike carb they use taper needle adjustable jets, so it's dead simple to get a light four stroke and back it off a smidge at the end of a straight, or have a saw four stroking till it loads up in the cut.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks