Page 12 of 15 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 145

Thread: Ikea 6X6D - anyone have an allen key?

  1. #111
    jorjatom68 Guest
    I think it's 20mm from memory. You might find a diff from the military, they already have the conversion done. They use defender front calipers though.
    The military stub is the bit you need then it's just a bit of plate to put the caliper on. Mine only just gets good pedal with disco rear calipers and a stage 1 master cylinder.

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Hi I've purchased the later Defender stub axles which will correct the track difference. My Defender already has the narrow bearing spacing so there won't be any change in bearings. Was talking to Barry Ward at Hi-Tough Engineering (Maxi-Drive axles) and we may be able to make up any halfshaft differences with special or maybe even the HTE-X flanges.

    Have also decided to use ventilated rotors on all axles so my mounting plates will be different and by using aftermarket callipers I can get the front rear bias correct.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #113
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1,151
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Any progress on this.

    It's a cool beast. Hate to see it fade away.

    I.

  4. #114
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    the holdup is the MSA transmission and the fact that I'm spending weekends moving the last of my toys off the now sold farm.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #115
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    posts from Intelliride or Accuair thread

    Quote Originally Posted by blackrangie View Post
    From the research i have done thus far:
    <snip>
    But intelliride might be the go becuase they are used on trucks and busses with 3 axles im sure and very customizable (windows based)
    From the investigation in the US, the suggestions have been to place sensors on one of the rear axles, probably the 3rd and have it managed as a single bag.

    When off road, lock the sensors out of the system so they don't start reacting to the axle movements over terrain with the processor command outputs as if its a flat road.

    AFAIK, the big problem (and its the same for bogy trucks) is that the air transfer between bags is not instantaneous so the bags are reacting to terrain events that have already passed.

    Joining the bags together is the only way to get some form of load sharing, otherwise, on coils when climbing over steps, the entire load can be on a single axle and diff with the other suspended without traction.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #116
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    From the investigation in the US, the suggestions have been to place sensors on one of the rear axles, probably the 3rd and have it managed as a single bag.

    When off road, lock the sensors out of the system so they don't start reacting to the axle movements over terrain with the processor command outputs as if its a flat road.

    AFAIK, the big problem (and its the same for bogy trucks) is that the air transfer between bags is not instantaneous so the bags are reacting to terrain events that have already passed.

    Joining the bags together is the only way to get some form of load sharing, otherwise, on coils when climbing over steps, the entire load can be on a single axle and diff with the other suspended without traction.
    The system should only attempt to level when stationary. Not when moving.
    So it shouldn't be reacting to terrain at all.

  7. #117
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    However with EAS doesn't it also activate in an anti roll situarion when cornering? i.e. when cornering at speed the weight goes to the outside (centrifugal force) depressing the bags on that side , the sensor detects the vehicle low on one side of the axle, so increases pressure on that bag reducing the body roll. After the corner the excess weight on the outside wheel dissipates and the sensor detects high on that side so reduces pressure in the bag till the sensor registers the normal height.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  8. #118
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    However with EAS doesn't it also activate in an anti roll situarion when cornering? i.e. when cornering at speed the weight goes to the outside (centrifugal force) depressing the bags on that side , the sensor detects the vehicle low on one side of the axle, so increases pressure on that bag reducing the body roll. After the corner the excess weight on the outside wheel dissipates and the sensor detects high on that side so reduces pressure in the bag till the sensor registers the normal height.
    **** no.
    That's getting into the realm of active suspension where any incorrect instruction can make the vehicles completely unstable. This is PID control of servo-pneumatics, it's a seriously complicated field and not something you'd ever get into as a retrofit.

    Simon (mechanical engineer from X-Eng) in the UK did have a tinker about 10 years ago and then gave up. You can read his exploits here: Sproklegrommet - The Unorthodox Engineers

    Notice the comments about having to pull power from the controller when it went unstable during tuning!

    As well as the instability and safety issues there are also massive air consumption associated with trying to run active air suspension on the fly. The only things EAS will do on the fly is raise to ride height (from access or low-profile mode) or drop to low-profile height. The height adjustment is far too slow to be completed around the average corner.

  9. #119
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  10. #120
    jorjatom68 Guest
    Try talking to the airbag man. Based in brisbane. I've briefly spoken to them about my 6x6. What I was thinking of doing to make it more stable off road was linking the two rear axles together on each side so the sharing occurs front to back not side to side. After speaking to road train drivers about the airbags on the double deck cattle trucks, they told me to be very careful about using them to share side to side as they've had some fall over because they react to slow. Sharing front to back should also help off road too, cause I have been hung up with 4 wheels off the ground. Only once and diff locks would have fixed that problem. I was also advised to keep coils in the steer, but was never really given a reason why. If it shared side to side on a separate system I can't see a problem, but the truck drivers see it different.

Page 12 of 15 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!