
Originally Posted by
Bush65
Castor correction bushes improve the castor but they upset the diff angle on Land Rovers (and reduce articulation)
In many conventional vehicles your understanding would be correct, but for the front tailshaft of coil sprung Land Rovers it is wrong.
Yes you can - this is exactly how a tailshaft with a double cardan joint must be set-up (e.g. Disco II front tailshaft). And is very close to how earlier coil sprung front tailshafts should be.
When Land Rover introduced coil springs, they raised the front of the engine to get more clearance between the engine and axle housing.
This inclined the engine and driveline down to the rear. This was not a problem for the rear tailshaft - just angle the diff pinion up so it was parallel with the engine and gearbox.
But angling the front diff pinion down would not be good for the u-joint angles.
So Land Rover angled the diff pinion up toward the t/case. This makes the u-joints out of phase, but by rotating the front and rear u-joints out of line it bought the joints back into phase and corrected the vibrations to an acceptable amount.
Rotating the swivel housing is the best way to correct the castor of a coil sprung Land Rover without upsetting the front tailshaft.
Bookmarks