Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Rotating recovery points. Comparison and pricing.

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pete View Post
    Probably a stupid question, I have a ARB deluxe winch bar on my disco2 if I want to fit these rings as recovery points where abouts would the optimal mounting points be on my bar? Thanks in advance.
    Pete
    IF they havent changed the design (and Im thinking about the right bar) from the last one I did install work on, theres a voidspace in front of the crushcan area, just in board of the plate that angles back. it puts the loadpoints perfectly in line with the chassis rail.

    you have to demound the bar to get into it and I reccomend that you cut up at least a 6mm thick plate with nicely curved and chamfered edges to act as a backing and support plate for the mount.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The original RRC ARB bar had eyebolts fitted inline with the chassis. They were 4mm with a 3mm additional plate behind welded in. They were (IMO) vastly underrated only being capable of fitting a 3T shackle and rated to 1.25T ea.

    As a comparison though a 2T eyebolt loaded to 20T only stretches 7mm (plastic deformation).

  3. #23
    AndyG's Avatar
    AndyG is offline YarnMaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    PNG
    Posts
    3,216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    At the risk of speaking up and showing my ignorance, shock load is the danger, so easy easy when taking up the load.
    By all means get a Defender. If you get a good one, you'll be happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
    apologies to Socrates

    Clancy MY15 110 Defender

    Clancy's gone to Queensland Rovering, and we don't know where he are

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Warwick Qld
    Posts
    1,977
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rathgar View Post
    Tal about my piecemeal responses - anyway,

    This is interesting taken from Just Staps website

    "NEW MANDATORY SAFETY STANDARD It is recommended that the minimum breaking strength of the .... etc
    Pardon me for being pedantic, but how can something mandatory be recommended? Shouldn't it read "required "

    Sent from my SM-G900I using AULRO mobile app
    -----
    You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be misquoted, then used against you.
    -----

    1999 Disco TD5 ("Bluey")
    1996 Disco 300 TDi ("Slo-Mo")
    1995 P38A 4.6 HSE ("The Limo")
    1966 No 5 Trailer (ARN 173 075) soon to be camper
    -----

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyG View Post
    At the risk of speaking up and showing my ignorance, shock load is the danger, so easy easy when taking up the load.
    The issue is the (mis)use of snatch straps. I am not at all a proponent of them, never use them and will never be recovered by one. I'll winch and catch up thanks.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    13,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clubagreenie View Post
    The issue is the (mis)use of snatch straps. I am not at all a proponent of them, never use them and will never be recovered by one. I'll winch and catch up thanks.
    i agree snatch snaps can be misused but there are times when winching simply wont do.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yet to find it. But soon to have one at each end it'll be even less of an issue.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Eevo View Post
    i agree snatch snaps can be misused but there are times when winching simply wont do.
    yep, most typically if your a bogan rev head toyota driver who simply cant fathom that oversized lifted unstable and non roadworthy wheel spining flying debry and valve bouncing/governror riding are not mandatory for recovery work.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    South Sydney
    Posts
    2,499
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think snatch straps are fantastic things, but I know how to use them and accept the risk...

    I've had a 40t strap let go and nothing happened because it was set up correctly and had a dampener on it, plus no one was standing within 1.5x the radius of the strap... it practically dropped to the ground. I've had more dramatic failures with drag chains behind tractors.

    I've even used one on an industrial site to recover a 5t forklift with my Discovery, WH&S bloke didn't bat an eye lid... strap was rated to 11000kg and as far as he was concerned it was fine (I know that will have a few people squirming in their seats).

    Personally you couldn't pay me to recover a car off a bull bar mounted with crush cans, the crush cans would deform before the snatch strap fails (plenty of evidence of this applying to D2's from the USA), 15t loading would be a static loading, not an impulse. However most people don't get stuck to the point of using maximum force in a recovery very often... so it's probably ok in 90% of cases.

    Swivels are all well and good, but providing the shackle pin does not bind (creating a bending moment), I see no issue with conventional type solid mounted recovery points. The binding issue can be overcome by using a sufficiently large diameter hole.

    I've had a look at what Beaver provides in our catalogues at work (Total Tools), and can get a price in the next fortnight if anyone is interested (I'm off, sowing at the moment).

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good to have a price comparison. Waiting on bulk purchase qty and pricing.

    My primary reason for changing is the existing eye bolts are only 2T each. And while they reach nowhere near plastic limits with loads that could be applied there's not quite enough margin in them and the thread is way too large on an appropriate size by comparison to the rotating points (which almost doesn't make sense except that maybe the HT status of a fastener cannot be or is detrimental if applied to the entire eyebolt).

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!