Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Carburettor issues

  1. #11
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by damiane View Post
    So is worth changing back to a new Zenith John given that I imagine it would overcome the problem with the under-bonnet space and allow me to retain the original configuration.
    That is what I would do. The adapter immediately above the manifold says that the original carburettor was a Zenith not a Solex (changeover was about early sixties, but there is no guarantee that a vehicle this old has the original engine).

    New Zeniths are available from some of the Landrover specialists - last one I took note of was Land Vehicle Spares, but I am sure they are not the only one. I think they are made in India, which hould have no bearing on their quality.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    ravenswood, Western Australia
    Posts
    352
    Total Downloaded
    0
    in the middle photo of the OP you will see a number stamped into the throttle body it starts with a 2

    below that is the number you will need for ordering parts, the one i had was a BXU-2

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by damiane View Post
    So is worth changing back to a new Zenith John given that I imagine it would overcome the problem with the under-bonnet space and allow me to retain the original configuration.
    hi i have in stock orignal solex regards jim
    Russell Rovers
    Series I Parts Specialists
    russellrovers AT gmail.com
    Phone 0428732001

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Mount Waverley
    Posts
    147
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    That is what I would do. The adapter immediately above the manifold says that the original carburettor was a Zenith not a Solex (changeover was about early sixties, but there is no guarantee that a vehicle this old has the original engine).

    New Zeniths are available from some of the Landrover specialists - last one I took note of was Land Vehicle Spares, but I am sure they are not the only one. I think they are made in India, which hould have no bearing on their quality.

    John
    I got a reply to my email to Land Vehicle Spares in NSW. They can supply Zenith or Webber suitable for the IIA. Just to confuse matters further they tell me they sell more Webbers than Zeniths. It looks as though I probably have the original motor with an assembly date at Enfield of December 1969 [thanks to Lotz-a-Landies]. Talk about spoiled for choice!

    So your recommendations gratefully received. Repair the Stromberg. Fit a new Zenith. Fit a new Webber. (By new I mean reconditioned or good copy) We had Webber Dual throats on the Cooper S rally cars in the 70's. My recollection is they were right ba****ds to set up. Seems overkill on a Land Rover Series IIA but I suppose everything depends on the model.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast Queensland Australia
    Posts
    6,469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    if it were my choice I would chuck the holden carby in the bin and refit the original, my car starts and runs like a dream on the original carby and oil bath aircleaner.
    the holden engine was 132 cubic inch, that converts to 2163 cc,
    your land rover engine is 2250 cc,
    although a minor different capacity between the engines, the holden is smaller, so the holden carby is under nourishing the land rover engine.
    Safe Travels
    harry

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Mount Waverley
    Posts
    147
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by harry View Post
    if it were my choice I would chuck the holden carby in the bin and refit the original, my car starts and runs like a dream on the original carby and oil bath aircleaner.
    the holden engine was 132 cubic inch, that converts to 2163 cc,
    your land rover engine is 2250 cc,
    although a minor different capacity between the engines, the holden is smaller, so the holden carby is under nourishing the land rover engine.
    Harry,

    there is much sense in what you suggest. I favour having what Land Rover intended, namely the Zenith. If that is what they thought appropriate for this engine to perform these tasks who am I to second-guess them.

    Damian

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Southern Adelaide
    Posts
    878
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by damiane View Post
    Harry,

    there is much sense in what you suggest. I favour having what Land Rover intended, namely the Zenith. If that is what they thought appropriate for this engine to perform these tasks who am I to second-guess them.

    Damian
    Land Rover favoured the Zenith for all sorts of reasons and you'd only be lucky if 'best for the job' was one of them. However, it was what was fitted originally. Provided it worked well then, why not, especially seeing you have the original motor.

    Webbers have a good name thanks to their sporting carbies, but I don't know that their cooking versions were anything special, though probably well made.

  8. #18
    schuy1 Guest
    I found when I fitted a holden carby was not that it lacked giving the old 2.25 get up and go, but rather a lack of low down slow running. No matter what I did with it you had a real prob with crawling around the bush with out it bogging down at points just as you wanted it to pull . If your style of driving is tackle obstacles full revs and damn the torpedos , not a problem! However that style tends to get expensive and hard on gear.
    The secret is in the jetting and throat size and shape which the stromberg does not cater for, so a zenith or solex p40, which 2a's had fitted up to '67, seem to be best suited.
    In my opinon any way
    Cheers Scott

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Mount Waverley
    Posts
    147
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by crackders View Post
    Land Rover favoured the Zenith for all sorts of reasons and you'd only be lucky if 'best for the job' was one of them. However, it was what was fitted originally. Provided it worked well then, why not, especially seeing you have the original motor.

    Webbers have a good name thanks to their sporting carbies, but I don't know that their cooking versions were anything special, though probably well made.
    Dunno about the last. My web(b)er Q does a mean slow roast!

  10. #20
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    1969 the Zenith was the one fitted. Webbers were, I believe, fitted to much later engines, probably to meet more stringent emission regulations. This would not seem to be a good reason to change .

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!