
Originally Posted by
rover-56
Hi Arthur,
I reckon the crank and rods would be well worth swapping.
I wonder what LR engineers were smoking when the decided to reduce the 3 litre to 2.6 for the Landrover.
Surely would have been better to upgrade the brakes.
If you can find the 3 litre camshaft timing info from that manual It would be great if you could post it here.
Cheers,
Terry
They did upgrade the brakes for the six. Whether the brakes were good enough for the higher power of the three litre is probably a matter of opinion - none of their contemporary competitors who put larger engines into four wheel drives at the time seem to have been too worried about braking performance - for example the more powerful FJ45 at that time had smaller brakes than the Landrover six, as well as a higher maximum weight.
But the reduced engine size was probably also influenced by the need to use the existing power train, which probably would have had problems with increased power. Remember that at the time, although Rover had the majority of the four wheel drive market outside the dollar area, it was still a small company, with limited resources - which at that time were largely going into bringing the Range Rover into production. (And it is just possible that they saw a larger engine in the LR as taking sales from the RR - nobody had any real idea of how well it would sell)
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Bookmarks