Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Wheel Cylinders

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,905
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Wheel Cylinders

    I am trying to identify which wheel cylinders are on this vehicle so that I can order new ones. The vehicle is an 88" and the brakes have obviously been upgraded from 10" to 109 11" x 2 1/4" at some time by a previous owner. It is the front wheels and the wheel cylinders are 1 1/4" dia. bore, however when I look up parts listings it states the cylinders should be the same as an 88" front cylinder. I have a spare set of 88" wheel cylinders here, but they have a 1" dia. bore. Very confusing! Any help greatly appreciated. Cheers, Mick.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,919
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I thought 109" fronts were twin-leading shoe ?


    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Blair Athol, Adelaide South Aust.
    Posts
    2,745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey Mick, looks like someone has fitted 11" rear brakes to the fronts. Fronts are twin leading shoe like grommit says.

    Cheers Rod

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,422
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Cylinders

    Hello from Surabaya.

    I understand that both the 4 and 6 cylinder engine 109" models have twin leading shoes as suggested. However, I also believe the 6 cylinder set up has wider shoes (3") and different wheel cylinders to the 4 cylinder models. The 2.5" wide set up, if they were front brakes originally, is presumably from a 4 cylinder 109".

    Cheers,

    Neil
    1975 S3 88" - Ratel

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,905
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 67hardtop View Post
    Hey Mick, looks like someone has fitted 11" rear brakes to the fronts. Fronts are twin leading shoe like grommit says.

    Cheers Rod




    Thanks Rod,
    that throws some light on it, the same setup as an 88", only larger diameter and wider shoes!
    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Blair Athol, Adelaide South Aust.
    Posts
    2,745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mick88 View Post
    Thanks Rod,
    that throws some light on it, the same setup as an 88", only larger diameter and wider shoes!
    Cheers, Mick.
    Yes that looks to be the case Mick. Thats 1 problem solvered.

    Cheers Rod

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Blair Athol, Adelaide South Aust.
    Posts
    2,745
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by S3ute View Post
    Hello from Surabaya.

    I understand that both the 4 and 6 cylinder engine 109" models have twin leading shoes as suggested. However, I also believe the 6 cylinder set up has wider shoes (3") and different wheel cylinders to the 4 cylinder models. The 2.5" wide set up, if they were front brakes originally, is presumably from a 4 cylinder 109".

    Cheers,

    Neil
    Hi S3ute, the 4 and 6 cyl and indeed the v8 stage1, 109's drum brakes all used the same wheel cylinders on the front. Its the backing plates that are different as well as the width of the shoes and drums. Also the 6 and v8 usually had a brake booster.

    Cheers Rod

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Sunbury, VIC
    Posts
    20,105
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 67hardtop View Post

    Hi S3ute, the 4 and 6 cyl and indeed the v8 stage1, 109's drum brakes and the 101 all used the same wheel cylinders on the front. Its the backing plates that are different as well as the width of the shoes and drums. Also the 6 and v8 usually had a brake booster.

    Cheers Rod
    Fixed it for you.
    If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,422
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thanks

    Quote Originally Posted by 67hardtop View Post

    Hi S3ute, the 4 and 6 cyl and indeed the v8 stage1, 109's drum brakes all used the same wheel cylinders on the front. Its the backing plates that are different as well as the width of the shoes and drums. Also the 6 and v8 usually had a brake booster.

    Cheers Rod
    Hello again and thanks for the clarification.

    Yes, I knew that the backing plates, drums and shoes were different between the 6 and 4 cylinder 109" models - I have the 6 cylinder model brakes with the booster on my 88"". I had some how managed to get it in my head that the wheel cylinders might have been different too, but apparently not so.

    Cheers,

    Neil
    1975 S3 88" - Ratel

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,905
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by S3ute View Post
    Hello again and thanks for the clarification.

    Yes, I knew that the backing plates, drums and shoes were different between the 6 and 4 cylinder 109" models - I have the 6 cylinder model brakes with the booster on my 88"". I had some how managed to get it in my head that the wheel cylinders might have been different too, but apparently not so.

    Cheers,

    Neil


    Neil, what you have in your head may be correct, as the ones I have are 1.250" dia. bores and the 88 wheel cylinders only have a 1.000" bore. On further investigation, I have a series 3 six cylinder one tonne wreck here, and it appears to have the larger bore rear wheel cylinders.


    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!