You don't get too many decent tyres in those sizes for under $500.
Wayne
Wayne
VK2VRC
"LandRover" What the Japanese aspire to be
Taking the road less travelled
'01 130 dualcab HCPU locked and loaded
LowRange 116.76:1
Steve
2003 Discovery 2a
In better care:
1992 Defender
1963 Series IIa Ambulance
1977 Series III Ex-Army
1988 County V8
1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
REMLR No. 215
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Sorry Garry, your argument concerning 1 ton axles doesn't wash, especially considering current 1 tonners have reverted back to standard Rover type diffs.
About 9 years ago I built and had a hybrid engineered on Q78s (36'') after proving to the engineer with part numbers that the equivelant size were fitted to the Shorland Armoured Car in the UK, which although weighing around 4 tons, still had the standard swivel housings,spindles, hubs and brakes.On fully floating axles these are the important components that concern the engineers, not how strong the diff/halfshaft components are.
And before anyone chimes in to say that TSL Q78s are not DOT approved, The bloke I built the hybrid for obtained sufficient technical information from Interco the tyre maker to convince the engineer otherwise.
Wagoo.
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Another point of note for series 2a ex militiary Aussie landies with cut away guards.
The cut away guards were done for two reasons.
1/ to improve access to the tyres to clean off mud.
2/ Improve body clearence for 900x 16 tyres.
The series 2a Aussie Military landies have taller suspension that stock just for 900x16s and I beleive the forward control 2a/b landies ran the the same chassis , or a extremely close copy of it and they run 900x 16.
In pracitice the military 2as never ran 900x16 as it was not needed for for most duties and the landies broke more than enough axle shafts with standard rubber in army drivers hands.
The fitting of 900x16 to the Aust army 2a landys was developed for the ambulance version and thing were carried though to the other versions for interchangeablity.
I believe the Aus military LWB vehicles shared the same chassis as the British counterparts, and AFAIK only the British LRDG vehicles were fitted with 9.00s, what is the story behind the Aus SWB military vehicles?Their chassis with deeper spring hangers and shackles were unique to Australia. Was it originally intended that they also be fitted with 9.00x16s?
As a side note, it is a shame that Rover didn't promote ENV diffs as standard on at least military contracts. and why didn't the military insist on them anyway?
Wagoo.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks