Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: 35-36'' tyres legal on Series vehicles or not?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    2,182
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You don't get too many decent tyres in those sizes for under $500.

    Wayne
    Wayne
    ​VK2VRC
    "LandRover" What the Japanese aspire to be
    Taking the road less travelled
    '01 130 dualcab HCPU locked and loaded
    LowRange 116.76:1

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toowoomba, Queensland
    Posts
    1,863
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LowRanger View Post


    Yes Bill,my headlight height is fine,and the body has had the necessary mods to allow fitment of the 35's,BUT the legal fitting of fitting larger tyres to certain models,just because they are fitted to another model by the same manufacturer isn't allowed,as I mentioned earlier,even without a compliance plate,which didn't come into effect in Australia till 1st August 1971,it will be on a model by model basis,not make by make.And a series 2 or 3 FC is not the same model as a series 2 or 3 109.And there were no options for a 110 or Defender.

    Wayne
    But, as Diana has said above, a military series 3 (in particular) is in almost every particular equivalent to the 1-ton which ran 9.00/16 tyres. Take advantage of the factory option 35 inch tyres and who could object? The vehicles left the factory engineered for them.
    Steve

    2003 Discovery 2a
    In better care:
    1992 Defender
    1963 Series IIa Ambulance
    1977 Series III Ex-Army
    1988 County V8
    1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
    REMLR No. 215

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scrambler View Post
    But, as Diana has said above, a military series 3 (in particular) is in almost every particular equivalent to the 1-ton which ran 9.00/16 tyres. Take advantage of the factory option 35 inch tyres and who could object? The vehicles left the factory engineered for them.
    The 35s were not an option - they were standard only on the 109 One Tonners and they had a different axles setup to standard 109s - mil 109s are different again and did not have the 900/16 option as far as I know.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    wetherill park
    Posts
    2,600
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    My Series 2a owners manual only lists 9.00x16 for the FC, but my Series 3 manual lists it as an option for all 109s. I'm pretty certain it was not an option for Series 1.

    The Series 2a/3 Optional Equipment parts book lists wheels for 9.00x16 sand tyres for all models, as well as regular tyres for the One Ton.

    John

    If it is listed for all models then your covered for all models I would have thought

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sorry Garry, your argument concerning 1 ton axles doesn't wash, especially considering current 1 tonners have reverted back to standard Rover type diffs.
    About 9 years ago I built and had a hybrid engineered on Q78s (36'') after proving to the engineer with part numbers that the equivelant size were fitted to the Shorland Armoured Car in the UK, which although weighing around 4 tons, still had the standard swivel housings,spindles, hubs and brakes.On fully floating axles these are the important components that concern the engineers, not how strong the diff/halfshaft components are.
    And before anyone chimes in to say that TSL Q78s are not DOT approved, The bloke I built the hybrid for obtained sufficient technical information from Interco the tyre maker to convince the engineer otherwise.
    Wagoo.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by THE BOOGER View Post
    If it is listed for all models then your covered for all models I would have thought
    I stand corrected.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wagoo View Post
    Sorry Garry, your argument concerning 1 ton axles doesn't wash, especially considering current 1 tonners have reverted back to standard Rover type diffs.
    What do you mean by current 1 tonners - (Defenders etc???) I thought we were talking about series vehicle 1 tonners I thought they have either env or sals front diffs. Were there any series 3 one tonners with rover front diffs?

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #38
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,523
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    What do you mean by current 1 tonners - (Defenders etc???) I thought we were talking about series vehicle 1 tonners I thought they have either env or sals front diffs. Were there any series 3 one tonners with rover front diffs?

    Garry
    According to the parts book, one tonners had the Rover diff from September 1974. The ENV was only on Series 2a; earlier Series 3 and late Series 2a had Salisbury.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nowra NSW
    Posts
    3,906
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Another point of note for series 2a ex militiary Aussie landies with cut away guards.
    The cut away guards were done for two reasons.
    1/ to improve access to the tyres to clean off mud.
    2/ Improve body clearence for 900x 16 tyres.

    The series 2a Aussie Military landies have taller suspension that stock just for 900x16s and I beleive the forward control 2a/b landies ran the the same chassis , or a extremely close copy of it and they run 900x 16.

    In pracitice the military 2as never ran 900x16 as it was not needed for for most duties and the landies broke more than enough axle shafts with standard rubber in army drivers hands.
    The fitting of 900x16 to the Aust army 2a landys was developed for the ambulance version and thing were carried though to the other versions for interchangeablity.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Dixons Creek Victoria
    Posts
    1,533
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 101 Ron View Post
    Another point of note for series 2a ex militiary Aussie landies with cut away guards.
    The cut away guards were done for two reasons.
    1/ to improve access to the tyres to clean off mud.
    2/ Improve body clearence for 900x 16 tyres.

    The series 2a Aussie Military landies have taller suspension that stock just for 900x16s and I beleive the forward control 2a/b landies ran the the same chassis , or a extremely close copy of it and they run 900x 16.

    In pracitice the military 2as never ran 900x16 as it was not needed for for most duties and the landies broke more than enough axle shafts with standard rubber in army drivers hands.
    The fitting of 900x16 to the Aust army 2a landys was developed for the ambulance version and thing were carried though to the other versions for interchangeablity.
    I believe the Aus military LWB vehicles shared the same chassis as the British counterparts, and AFAIK only the British LRDG vehicles were fitted with 9.00s, what is the story behind the Aus SWB military vehicles?Their chassis with deeper spring hangers and shackles were unique to Australia. Was it originally intended that they also be fitted with 9.00x16s?
    As a side note, it is a shame that Rover didn't promote ENV diffs as standard on at least military contracts. and why didn't the military insist on them anyway?
    Wagoo.

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!