Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 52

Thread: Truetrac Diffs What I've Learned.

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,757
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by harro View Post
    I have Ascrofts ATB's fitted front and rear to my 02my Defender and they have transformed the vehicle.
    In sand the vehicle now tends to want to stall before it will bog down and I have not seen the traction control light come on since they went in.
    And no noticeable difference to driving on the tarmac.

    For offroading, the best money I have spent

    Paul.
    Like I mentioned - I have a series with Truetrac and detroit locker, I find I run out of power to turn the wheels LONG before I get bogged down.... I can run around on medium soft sand in 2H, but tend to run out of power to turn wheels so then drop to 4L.

    I didn't realise that was how the truetrac worked! thanks for posting those videos guys. Must be why I struggle to get stuck yes yes I know, "if your not getting stuck you didn't go far enough off the track"

    I think that I'm putting a pair of truetracs on the list for the D90! That should be quiet awesome.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    653
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a TrueTrac in the front (Maxi in the back) of my 110 Isuzu County. As it runs 255/85 tyres and the engine is turbocharged & intercooled, I've also fitted uprated axles and flanges.

    You don't notice the TrueTrac when driving on the road. I can't comment on off road performance, as in the years I've had the vehicle it's never really been off road. That will happen soon though.

  3. #33
    AndyG's Avatar
    AndyG is offline YarnMaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    PNG
    Posts
    3,216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If fitting a Detroit locker or similar warrants upgraded axles, whats the implications for the Transfer case/Gearbox. I think i would rather snap an axle than transfer the problem elsewhere ?

    (One of the main reasons i am looking at LSD rather than Locker)
    By all means get a Defender. If you get a good one, you'll be happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
    apologies to Socrates

    Clancy MY15 110 Defender

    Clancy's gone to Queensland Rovering, and we don't know where he are

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyG View Post
    If fitting a Detroit locker or similar warrants upgraded axles, whats the implications for the Transfer case/Gearbox. I think i would rather snap an axle than transfer the problem elsewhere ?

    (One of the main reasons i am looking at LSD rather than Locker)
    The idea that strengthening one component will mean you break something back up the drivelive is a fallacy.

    Btw - the LT230 t-case is the strongest component in most landrovers.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by AndyG View Post
    If fitting a Detroit locker or similar warrants upgraded axles, whats the implications for the Transfer case/Gearbox. I think i would rather snap an axle than transfer the problem elsewhere ?

    (One of the main reasons i am looking at LSD rather than Locker)
    Nil implications for the Tcase unless you havent been giving it the love it deserves.

    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    The idea that strengthening one component will mean you break something back up the drivelive is a fallacy.

    Btw - the LT230 t-case is the strongest component in most landrovers.
    I disagree with your first point. if you beef up the weakest link in a system something else becomes the weakest link. In a landy once you bullet proof the diffs and axles its a 50/50 toss between the drive shafts and the gearbox/clutch.
    If you're driving a stockish tdi or stock V8 its not really an issue as, short of poor maintenance, general wear and tear, manufacturing defect or prolonged lack of vehicle sympathy (riding or dropping the clutch repeatedly), you dont have enough grunt to damage the clutch or gearbox and usually a propshaft thats had a knock will let go first.



    I agree with the strength of the LT230.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Williamstown, Barossa, SA
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    The idea that strengthening one component will mean you break something back up the drivelive is a fallacy.

    Btw - the LT230 t-case is the strongest component in most landrovers.
    Far from it.. Its a given! By replacing shafts and all but eliminating the possibility of breaking them moves the issue to the Rover diff.. By fitting a solid case locker (like most are) and lessening the back lash on the R&P or fitting a Salisbury moves the issue to the props and gearbox.. It can't do anything but move the weak link as you are eliminating the others. My weak link on the 101 is my props, and that will be rectified when funds allow.

    Agreed with the LT230.. I've also modified that with one piece cross in the CDL, thick wall tube instead of crush tube on the center shaft and a strength/anti spread plate between the increased capacity sump and the casing... I'm using a truck box that was designed to go behind the Cummins.. and if that turbo is not singing, Im not happy. So far (5000kms now) its all taking the abuse it will be getting from 200+ hp and 500+ nm of torque.
    1995 Mercedes 1222A 4x4
    1969 (Now know! Thanks Diana!!) Ser 2 Tdi SWB

    1991 VW Citi Golf Cti (soon to be Tdi)

    'When there's smoke, there's plenty of poke!!'
    'The more the smoke, the more the poke!!'

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    While I have experience of tru-tracs, I had a Detroit/Eaton in the rear of my 110. My opinion seems to be a bit different from others here.

    While the traction improvement was great, the downsides for me mean that I wouldnt go this way again. The downsides were:
    -greatly increased driveline backlash which tended to impact negatively on the driving experience
    -because it cannot be manually unlocked, there are situations off-road where it would regularly get me into trouble:
    -slippery side slopes - the rear of the vehicle will tend to 'walk' sideways which in a tight situation can be dangerous
    -steep, loose downhills (low first type hills) - the rear has a disconcerting tendency to 'come around', the cure is a quick dab on the throttle, but this can be hairy at times.

    I will only fit a manually lockable rear diff from now on, or possibly a decent LSD, but these options are scarce for a Salisbury....

    A tru-trac in the front sounds interesting. Looking at the video,it may even reduce front diff backlash - the rover centre is pretty sloppy at the best of times.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Warner Area - SEQ
    Posts
    1,925
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by mark2 View Post
    While I have experience of tru-tracs, I had a Detroit/Eaton in the rear of my 110. My opinion seems to be a bit different from others here.

    While the traction improvement was great, the downsides for me mean that I wouldnt go this way again. The downsides were:
    -greatly increased driveline backlash which tended to impact negatively on the driving experience
    -because it cannot be manually unlocked, there are situations off-road where it would regularly get me into trouble:
    -slippery side slopes - the rear of the vehicle will tend to 'walk' sideways which in a tight situation can be dangerous
    -steep, loose downhills (low first type hills) - the rear has a disconcerting tendency to 'come around', the cure is a quick dab on the throttle, but this can be hairy at times.

    I will only fit a manually lockable rear diff from now on, or possibly a decent LSD, but these options are scarce for a Salisbury....

    A tru-trac in the front sounds interesting. Looking at the video,it may even reduce front diff backlash - the rover centre is pretty sloppy at the best of times.

    Interesting.... would this backlash be the same for an Constant AWD Auto like the Disco's, etc ??

    I would have to agree with u that it greatly increases the backlash as this is what I experienced in my Zook, but that is not a constant AWD (I have FWH on the Front of the Zook) like the Disco's, so it makes me wonder if it would be a different experience with a constant 4WD Disco Auto's ??

  9. #39
    redrovertdi Guest
    I dont have any of that backlash other than the very rear/ocasional clunk when the detroit locks back in, but mine is the modern SL model and not the older noisier one, also my 110 is an auto.
    As said befor the trutrac in the front and detroit in the back is great.
    Easy fit, i scribed the front crownwheel to the housing so it was reinstalled in the same location and that was probably 80,000ks ago, detroit is even easier to fit in a salisbury

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney, you know. The olympic one.
    Posts
    4,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a D2, so ABS & TC with Ashcroft ATB in the rear. There is less backlash in the setup of the centre compared to a std centre according to Craft who assembled the center. Conversely though it doesn't feel as "tight" when turning over by hand. There is no clunking of backlash and at rest there is less movement in the driveline by comparison. The ATB really is seamless in operation with the TC as you don't need to think about left foot braking to make it work. Personally I also think that the ATB has less detrimental effects on the driveline as the operation is not on/off it's quite progressive.

Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!