
Originally Posted by
Slunnie
Those shocks will be too long. The springs already start to dislocate at the backs of the springs with the 655mm shock lengths, but another 2" will have the springs fall out, the front ACE hydraulic will hit the Panhard mount (prob not an issue in the US LHD spec), the watts linkage will totally bind and if you keep the standard swaybar links on, they will be too short. To make things worse, if you're running the rose joints (heims) on the front, then you need to run the adaptor that they also sell for the bottom mount and that increases the effective length of the shock further.
To get around this...
Legally in Aus you cant due to the spring dislocation. Thats never worried lots of people in the past, but just so you're aware.
For the front you would need to retain the springs, preferably at the bottom so the springs don't fall out. The rubber bushes at the top will probably work as spring relocation cones no doubt. Also, you will need to extend the swaybar links by more than 2", which probably means new links.
On the rear..
The watts linkage will bind, but they do sell cranked Watts linkages which are the next step up in modifying the suspension for extra travel. Bent links are weak, but there are a lot of people running them with and without success. The bent Watts link will probably be ok, not that I've seen or run it. You can run front swaybar drop links on the rear. You will need to retain the rear coils to stop them from falling out and you will need to add dislocation cones at the top so that they do back into place.
Also, brake and ABS lines will need to be extended a further 2"+ over the normal extension.
Bookmarks