Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 46

Thread: Vortex Generators

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Redland Bay QLD
    Posts
    528
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Its bull****.



    he gain if it even works is minimal. Car makers go to extreme lengths to make laminar flow from the rear of a vehicle. The little V shaped pieces are going to disturb flow more than laminate it. If you carries a giant piece of honeycomb then perhaps it might help, but meh. To achieve perfect flow, turblulent flow is required on the surface, in the1-5mm region, so as to reduce friction. And the rest is laminar. there is no way that laminar flow can be achieved off the back of a 4wd. It wil lcreate a huge vacuum, regardless. in such conditions, turbulent flow is better anyhow. nmothing can fix the hideous aerodynamics of a flat tailgate.

    Screw that for a joke.


    Cheers!
    Colin.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    cairns
    Posts
    1,675
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by tombraider View Post
    RHJSTR runs them on the roofline of his discovery.

    We were discussing the benefits etc... of them...

    He was happy with them.

    Hopefully he'll pipe up soon!!!!!
    Thanks Mike, thats the kind of response I've been looking for.
    Hope he is forthcoming with his results.
    Cheers,
    Paul.
    Paul.

    77 series3 (sold)
    95 300Tdi Ute (sold)
    2003 XTREME Td5

    I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bundaberg Qld.
    Posts
    632
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It wil lcreate a huge vacuum, regardless. in such conditions, turbulent flow is better anyhow. nmothing can fix the hideous aerodynamics of a flat tailgate.
    That isn't entirely correct. You can't fix them but they can be improved. Look at the golf ball. Who would have thought what the little dimples could do.

    Don't think landrover stuck the defender in a wind tunnel. Probably didn't want to know.

    WR.
    84' 120" ute - 3.9 isuzu.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    cairns
    Posts
    1,675
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wovenrovings View Post
    That isn't entirely correct. You can't fix them but they can be improved. Look at the golf ball. Who would have thought what the little dimples could do.

    Don't think landrover stuck the defender in a wind tunnel. Probably didn't want to know.

    WR.
    Yes, I think they were hoping it would spend most of it's time doing what it is designed to do.
    Unfortunately in this country especially, this is not the case.
    Many hours can be spent on highways at or dare I say it above the speed limit, here in QLD this is certainly common.
    Cheers,
    Paul.
    Paul.

    77 series3 (sold)
    95 300Tdi Ute (sold)
    2003 XTREME Td5

    I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    35
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Its the biggest load of BS I heard since people swore blind fitting cyclones into their air intake makes more power.

    The reference to aircraft using such technology is very twisted, it is used on aircraft wing tips for vortex reduction, it is not and cannot be used on the wings trailing edge. And for that one reason it wont work on a vehicle as displayed. Anyways, a defender or Disco will never win any friends in a wind tunnel, its nothing more than a brick.

    You all know how the old saying about a fool and his money goes.


    Emerald

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    cairns
    Posts
    1,675
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by emerald View Post
    Its the biggest load of BS I heard since people swore blind fitting cyclones into their air intake makes more power.

    The reference to aircraft using such technology is very twisted, it is used on aircraft wing tips for vortex reduction, it is not and cannot be used on the wings trailing edge. And for that one reason it wont work on a vehicle as displayed. Anyways, a defender or Disco will never win any friends in a wind tunnel, its nothing more than a brick.

    You all know how the old saying about a fool and his money goes.


    Emerald
    It is a VORTEX GENERATOR and is proven technology in aircraft.

    Cheers,
    Paul.



    Paul.

    77 series3 (sold)
    95 300Tdi Ute (sold)
    2003 XTREME Td5

    I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toowoomba, Queensland
    Posts
    1,863
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by beforethevision View Post
    Its bull****.



    he gain if it even works is minimal. Car makers go to extreme lengths to make laminar flow from the rear of a vehicle. The little V shaped pieces are going to disturb flow more than laminate it. If you carries a giant piece of honeycomb then perhaps it might help, but meh. To achieve perfect flow, turblulent flow is required on the surface, in the1-5mm region, so as to reduce friction. And the rest is laminar. there is no way that laminar flow can be achieved off the back of a 4wd. It wil lcreate a huge vacuum, regardless. in such conditions, turbulent flow is better anyhow. nmothing can fix the hideous aerodynamics of a flat tailgate.

    Screw that for a joke.


    Cheers!
    Colin.
    An aerodynamic Defender? Whatever next?

    The best, by far, way to improve the aerodynamics of a Defender is to remove the roof altogether, lower the windscreen and fit a cover over the unfilled seats. Well, it works for 50's Brit sportscars

    Seriously lads, you get 10l/100 in a vehicle that has a load capacity of a ton (give or take a little) or seating for up to 10, and can be dismantled with a couple of shifting spanners and screwdrivers. It's enough! you don't need 5% better economy!
    Steve

    2003 Discovery 2a
    In better care:
    1992 Defender
    1963 Series IIa Ambulance
    1977 Series III Ex-Army
    1988 County V8
    1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
    REMLR No. 215

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    35
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Proven on a wing where obtaining laminar flow at a cruise speed is essential in reducing fuel consumption where a known reynolds number dicatates how the airfoil section behaves within its lift/drag coefficient.

    It WILL NOT work at a variety of speeds on a slow moving car relative to an aircraft wing that is designed to cruise. Flow seperation is a function of wing profile and air speed. It is pure nonsense for something that cant cruise for long hours at its most economic speed.

    I wont get into the other physics behind wings, its a waste of bandwidth and I think enough people see this gizmo for what it is.

    You'd get a similar fuel saving by keeping your tyre pressures correct and having clean air/fuel filters.

    Scrambler nailed it, an aerodynamic defender

    Emerald

  9. #19
    tombraider Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by harro View Post
    Thanks Mike, thats the kind of response I've been looking for.
    Hope he is forthcoming with his results.
    Cheers,
    Paul.
    Paul

    One of the prime things he stated was a noticeable lack of dirt/bull dust on the rear window and tailgate.

    When he opens the door not as much dust falls in the disco now...

    And in the wet he tells me the rear window stays clearer with a noticeable difference in the lack of road spray on the glass.

  10. #20
    tombraider Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by beforethevision View Post
    Its bull****.



    The gain if it even works is minimal. Car makers go to extreme lengths to make laminar flow from the rear of a vehicle.
    Now thats funny!!!!!!

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!