I use 7.50x16 on both the 110 and the 2a. For a given pressure, and ignoring the stiffness of the sidewalls, the ground contact area will be the same regardless of the tyre width - pressure times area will always equal the weight on the wheel. So it comes down to whether you are better off with the contact area more or less elongated in the direction of travel, and it seems clear that elongation in the direction of travel is preferable, as it will tend to bridge over irregularities rather than to drop into them, and so be less likely to get stuck. Of course, this applies only where you are likely to get stuck anyway. On hard surfaces such as bitumen, the advantage of wider tyres is that the wider effective track improves stability. Against this is higher loading on all steering and hub components, and more bump steer as the leverage of an irregularity hitting the outer or inner edge of the tyre is greater.
Increasing the tyre width over the manufacturer's design also means you are operating outside the design loads, particularly on steering components and wheel bearings, but ultimately on everything to do with the suspension and drive train, from wheel studs to wheel bearings to half axles to transfer cases.
In summary, the only advantage of wider tyres is a small increase in stability on bitumen, as against reduced life on mechanical components, worse steering and turning circle, and generally more prone to damage.
Note that the above applies to wider tyres. As soon as you increase the overall diameter, it is a different story. As far as grip, traction and resistance to getting stuck go, an increase in diameter is all good, and may well outweigh the effects of increased width. But increases in diameter also have drawbacks, from changes to effective gearing to increased leverage of the tyre on driveline and brakes, making breakages much more likely.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Bookmarks