Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 134

Thread: Narrow tyres V Wide tyres

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Sunny Pucka
    Posts
    3,138
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    I did but didn't bother. Have you read Easo's posts?



    Ron
    They get better when my wifes home!!

    Easo

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    878
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LRHybrid100 View Post
    4WD Monthly did an article ages ago about Wide vs Tall tyres and the the tall skinny ones came out on top - its all down to air pressures.

    When air pressures are reduced the "footprint" of the tall skinny increases more proportionally than the wide tyres, as the footprint gets bigger length ways and not width ways - if this makes sense?

    LRH
    this doesn't make a lot of sense to me but i'm not saying it's wrong, but surely even if the tyre is wider then when you let air out it will still elongate in proportion to the amount of air you let out as will a thinner tyre
    why would a thinner tyre elongate more, i would think they would both elongate the same (as long as the rubber was the same i.e 1 not harder than the other) and then the wider 1 would still have a larger footprint due to the fact it's wider.
    tho i understand and agree with the statement of a wider tyre having to push more sand away out of it's path

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    3,424
    Total Downloaded
    0
    letting the air down on a wide tyre does not make the tread wider just sidewall bulge, however letting a skinny tyre down gives it more length - and therefore a greater proportional footprint.

    LRH
    Disco 4 SDV6 Auto
    Disco 4 SDV8 Dual Cab Project
    Disco 2 M57 Extra Cab Project
    Foton Tunland Cummins ISF
    Disco 1 3 door 4.6 V8 Auto
    RRC V8 Auto "Classic" Softdash
    RRC 300 TDI Auto
    Disco 1 TD5 Auto Buggy
    Disco 1 300 Tdi Auto Ute
    SAME Explorer 70HP 4x4 Tractor plus Nell Loader
    Subaru GDA WRX
    Triumph Bonneville SE
    Yamaha TTR250





  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Narrow
    7.50 x 16
    • The SIII did the Simpson East-West with 7.50x16 tyres.
    • After the tyres that came with the Defender wore out, I replaced them with 7.50R16.
    • The trailer has 7.50x16
    • The Range Rover has 215/85R16 (tall & skinny).

    Narrow tyres have a long foot print with a narrow face. Wide tyres have a wide face. To use a hyperbole - imagine a tank (long & narrow) and a steam roller (wide) trying to get through any type of terrain. The long narrow footprint will always traverse it better. Plus less stress on steering components etc.



  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael2 View Post
    To use a hyperbole - imagine a tank (long & narrow) and a steam roller (wide) trying to get through any type of terrain. The long narrow footprint will always traverse it better.
    I must remember that analogy when arguing with the wide tyre brigade. Makes perfect sense.

  6. #26
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I use 7.50x16 on both the 110 and the 2a. For a given pressure, and ignoring the stiffness of the sidewalls, the ground contact area will be the same regardless of the tyre width - pressure times area will always equal the weight on the wheel. So it comes down to whether you are better off with the contact area more or less elongated in the direction of travel, and it seems clear that elongation in the direction of travel is preferable, as it will tend to bridge over irregularities rather than to drop into them, and so be less likely to get stuck. Of course, this applies only where you are likely to get stuck anyway. On hard surfaces such as bitumen, the advantage of wider tyres is that the wider effective track improves stability. Against this is higher loading on all steering and hub components, and more bump steer as the leverage of an irregularity hitting the outer or inner edge of the tyre is greater.

    Increasing the tyre width over the manufacturer's design also means you are operating outside the design loads, particularly on steering components and wheel bearings, but ultimately on everything to do with the suspension and drive train, from wheel studs to wheel bearings to half axles to transfer cases.

    In summary, the only advantage of wider tyres is a small increase in stability on bitumen, as against reduced life on mechanical components, worse steering and turning circle, and generally more prone to damage.

    Note that the above applies to wider tyres. As soon as you increase the overall diameter, it is a different story. As far as grip, traction and resistance to getting stuck go, an increase in diameter is all good, and may well outweigh the effects of increased width. But increases in diameter also have drawbacks, from changes to effective gearing to increased leverage of the tyre on driveline and brakes, making breakages much more likely.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, north of the river
    Posts
    1,924
    Total Downloaded
    0
    7.50xR16's

    Came with the Defender and never looked back for offroad work.

    Believe in the same reasons as stated previously about tyre elongation.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    in the ghetto...mt druitt 2770
    Posts
    62
    Total Downloaded
    0
    had 10.5x15s on the series when i got it.
    went to 7.50x16s for availability 2nd hand

    very happy,big difference,all good

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    3,570
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ha I love the fact that a 4wd magazine have claimed a wider tyre does not elongate when aired down.

    For mud I will agree generally the skinny tyre will bite down to the hard stuff and get you through where as times big wide treads will just slip along the surface.

    BUT in anything else I have found the slightly wider tyres to perform better, when aired down correctly they eleongate plenty.

    And my opinion of this is related to the more extreme offroad adventures. For everyday use and general touring I would have no idea
    I rule!!!

    2.4" of Pure FURY!!!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Auckland, NZ
    Posts
    2,278
    Total Downloaded
    0

    horses for courses

    There are situations where wide tyres with aggressive tread are good, but to my mind those are in the minority and only really apply to, for example, extreme competition environments.

    In the main I prefer narrow tyres and have only wished I had wide ones when on slippery clay or traversing rocks. I use 750x16 Jeep Service and Triple Traction (will get them standardised when the Jeeps wear out) on George.

    Flat feet on the Disco though. Only gets used on the road.
    Alan
    2005 Disco 2 HSE
    1983 Series III Stage 1 V8

Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!