Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Bilsteins for a D2 with 30mm lift?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, AU
    Posts
    840
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Bilsteins for a D2 with 30mm lift?

    Have had some conflicting advice from suppliers as to whether I need the standard or longer shocks for my Disco 2 with a 30mm lift. I have extended bump stops on the rear.

    Any advice out there? I looked thru the archives and found the references to the 50mm.
    _________________________
    1996 D1 V8 - gone
    2002 D2 Td5 ES- gone but still running elsewhere
    2013 D4 SDV6 HSE - gone
    2023 Defender 110SE D300

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jwb View Post
    Have had some conflicting advice from suppliers as to whether I need the standard or longer shocks for my Disco 2 with a 30mm lift. I have extended bump stops on the rear.

    Any advice out there? I looked thru the archives and found the references to the 50mm.
    I would go longer. I have had quite a few +30mm and +50mm Unladen D1's for example top out their Bilsteins when going over speed humps. If you intend being loaded up 24/7 or not wanting more droop travel then go standard.
    All that said, it also depends on the spring rates. A higher rate(stiffer) spring will cause more topping out than a softer rate, as the shock won't return so quickly/ further.
    Longer shocks; If they are much longer than the advertised spring height increase may need spring dislocation cones or they may need to be retained to prevent spring tops dropping out at full travel. The D2 is better for this as the top insulator is quite a good shape
    One more example, I've seen a set of standard length (B46 0253) fitted to the rear of a stock 130 CC, unladen they topped out continuously. With a load in they were fantastic
    JC
    Last edited by justinc; 27th December 2007 at 09:29 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    2 x part no : B46 0243
    2 x part no : BE5 2779
    Are what I put on the Fender with a 2" lift, no dramas topping out so far, but I have a reasonable load in the 110 most of the time. Poly airs also put in.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    557
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi mate,
    I had a 50mm lift and then the guys fitted the standard Bilstein shocks, nearly rammed into another car on the road as they were to short and breaking on a rough surface made the wheels jump all over the place. After fitting the longer shock the problem was solved.
    Not sure but if your springs are not long enough compared to the shocks the may pop out so either fit dislocating cones or take same tools with.
    Cheers
    The entertainer

  5. #5
    T.D.5 Guest

    50mm Suspension lift.

    Quote Originally Posted by jwb View Post
    Have had some conflicting advice from suppliers as to whether I need the standard or longer shocks for my Disco 2 with a 30mm lift. I have extended bump stops on the rear.

    Any advice out there? I looked thru the archives and found the references to the 50mm.
    Hi there JWB. 30 mm just isnt worth it. Go the whole hog on 50mm. Springs & shocks. I used progressives in the rear & find them fantastic. I'm on ARBs nitrochargers shockwise & havent had an issue to date. This was all done from new & they have held up well.

    & I am about to fit 19"s to replace my 16"s just for another inch or so overall.

    HTH

    Cheers

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    I'll add some confusion. The shocks need to match the spring free length irrespective of the rate. The shocks though will provide a degree of retension so the shock will still partly squeeze the spring, and you will have direct spring load acting on the shock. My thoughts and practise when setting up is to have as little spring load on the shock as practically possible when the shock is fully open, meaning run the longest shock you can without the spring dislocating. It'll blow your mind when you work out the forces going through a shock, especially when reaching max travel. Doing it this way maximises suspension travel, and if you need to run extended bumpstops to suit that shock, despte what people say, you will not be losing travel overall. If the 30mm is a given lift to the static ride height and the springs are stiffer, then probably a standard length shock will be the right length because the lift is created by the spring rate (stiffness) not compressing under the weight of the Disco as much when compared to the standard spring. A longer shock will probably cause the springs to click when they go loose in the mounts. Also, there is some to be gained, but not much to be gained from a Disco2 with extended shocks unless you start spacing or extended brake + ABS lines and moving the Xmember under the front prop shaft. If the 30mm lift has standard rates or softer rates then you'll need to run longer shocks and bumpstop spacers to suit the longer shocks closed lengths. If you do run longer shocks, then check and check again that there is no pull on any brake/ABS lines and there is no contact with the Xmember under the front propshaft! I don't believe that Bilstein have allowed for these factors, and even ARB/OME got it wrong initially and ended up shortening their D2 shocks due to contact of the propshaft.

    Another spanner in the works is.... I'm pretty sure the standard length Disco2 Bilstein is/was 20mm shorter than factory. I've dealt a lot with Bilstein and love their work and products - and interestingly their comments were that 20mm isn't a significant length difference with the shock... I disagree, but then again they are focussed on performance, where we add a critical suspension travel perspective. I'm not sure if they revised their lengths for the Disco2, but also something worth checking.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  7. #7
    T.D.5 Guest

    D2 aftermarket shocks & springs

    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I don't believe that Bilstein have allowed for these factors, and even ARB/OME got it wrong initially and ended up shortening their D2 shocks due to contact of the propshaft.
    Spot on Slunnie. I forgot about those issues.

    I've been a Bilstein fan for many years & have along relationship with Heasmans. Back in 04 When I got D2 2 I spoke with them re replacement shocks & confirmed they were 20mm shorter. They advised you would be hard pressed locking out the shock due to their valving & pressure rates. I wasnt sure on that.

    I checked around & confirmed that ARBs offering had been corrected from their issues with propshaft contact from 02/03. In the end I opted for OME Nitrochargers & Custom springs. As I said earlier I have had nothing but excellent performance out of them. The progressive rear springs allow me to load up the rear & still maintain level, corner hard (when loaded) in that event if required & they perform well offroad too. I also run nitrogen in the tyres which improves road feel.

    BTW I opted for no SLS or ACE on D2 2

    Cheers

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, AU
    Posts
    840
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for the helpful advice. To clarify, I have a 2002 Td5:
    rear: SLS and ACE and have 30mm spacers under the air bags and similar extensions on the bump stops giving me a real 30mm above standard hub to guard.
    front: I have OME 779 (I think) springs but height is reduced with TJM bar and winch.

    Will probably go with the BE5 6046/7 Bilsteins.
    _________________________
    1996 D1 V8 - gone
    2002 D2 Td5 ES- gone but still running elsewhere
    2013 D4 SDV6 HSE - gone
    2023 Defender 110SE D300

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ringwood, Vic
    Posts
    2,127
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey T.D.5
    Just wondering what tyres you intend putting on the 19" wheels that will give you more height????
    Extra height (under the diffs) is usually based on larger tyre diameter, but hey, I stand ready to be corrected here.
    Last edited by wardy1; 31st December 2007 at 08:29 PM.
    D4 SDV6, a blank canvas

  10. #10
    T.D.5 Guest

    Larger tyre diameter = lift.

    Quote Originally Posted by wardy1 View Post
    Hey T.D.5
    Just wondering what tyres you intend putting on the 19" wheels that will give you more height????
    Extra height (under the diffs) is usually based on larger tyre diameter, but hey, I stand ready to be corrected here.
    The existing oem size overall is 29"(736mm) & the replacement rims & tyres are 30.3" (770mm) so I nett approx 3/4" or exactly 16.5 mm in augmented lift at the diffs.

    The tyres are 255/55/19.

    Cheers

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!