Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Rancho shocks

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren
    Posts
    835
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hmm, those guys don't seem to have Billies in stock for ser 1 discos at present.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Townsville, QLD
    Posts
    706
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    Hey Inc!!!

    How on earth did the word RANCHO get past the anti swearing filter???




    Best add that one to the list of banned words here on this forum!




    Hi Wannalandy,
    I am unashamadly anti rancho for LR's.
    Bilstein, DeCarbon, Koni, even OME are in a different universe to these overrated under achievers of shock absorbers! I have a filing cabinet outside my workshop for these. It's big and blue and it has COLLEX and a Hippo painted on the side of it.

    Is that a strong enough opinion for you?

    JC
    JC, you have failed to mention the fun n games I had with a well advertised supplier with an alphanumeric name.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Townsville, QLD
    Posts
    706
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Angry

    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    Rancho aren't Aussie, (designed and built in the US) only the importer is Australian.

    Hmmm, how can I put this delicately. Rancho are a triumph of marketing over substance. There are much better options available.
    Rick, there wouldn't be to many times i could correct you but the Rancho Ru__ish isn't made in the US as such. Its made in Mexico. Interestingly enough somewhere I have an e-mail from a Rancho engineer in the US advising that they DO NOT make a shock absorber for Defenders after 1996.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevo_62 View Post
    Rick, there wouldn't be to many times i could correct you but the Rancho Ru__ish isn't made in the US as such. Its made in Mexico. Interestingly enough somewhere I have an e-mail from a Rancho engineer in the US advising that they DO NOT make a shock absorber for Defenders after 1996.
    The only reason hey don't list a Defender after '96 is that they weren't available there after that.
    The big problem, as you've alluded to, is the importer.
    The sad thing is that I dealt with them for years and years when trading under another name for my Jeep parts and they were fantastic (the father ran that business )

    A long time ago when trying to get some long travel rear shocks that would bolt up to the existing mounts the best I could come up with at one stage was their TLC80 Series which 'the son' assured me would work inverted, but was cagey enough to stipulate "they aren't designed for that model, so there are no guarantees"
    When they turned up I wasn't too taken with the build quality (mainly the eyes) and I was also advised "don't use our urethane bushes, you'll snap the eyes off"
    Guess what, they don't work inverted I only found out afterwards that their "foam gas cell" is nothing more than some closed cell foam jammed into the outer cylinder.
    Oh, and I couldn't return them, even though they'd only been used for a couple of hundred km as I'd used them in a 'non standard' situation.

  5. #25
    HSVRangie Guest
    Rancho
    a poorly performing shock.

    they sort of work on a h/way.

    they sort of work on slow 4x4 crawl but fade very fast.

    they last about 5 min in any servere usage.

    they cannot stand fastdrive over iregular surface.

    they are not valved to suit any particular vehicle.

    expensive for what they are greatest marketing campaign around.

    Buy bils or konies from US.

    Michael.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,260
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Hmmm, I an fade a set of Ranchos in about 15 mins. Seriously.

    The problem with them is that they fade really easily and the foam cell shocks don't ever really recover from a fade, they just keep deteriorating. Actually I hate all foam cell shocks because of it.

    I would them lump all twin shell shocks in the next batch of shocks as they can all still over heat, airate and fade off. At least they will recover and this includes Konis.

    My preference is Bilstein and any other shock that seperates the oil from any gas such as remote canister shocks. These don't fade and they keep performing. I would pay a few more dollars over the Rancho and get a good shock.

    Also, I think the reason why the Ranchos had their heyday is because for the comp and big suspension boys, it was about the only easy really long travel option. The consumer followed.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!