Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 66

Thread: spring retainers vs dislocation cones

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The most acceptable 3 link plus panhard front suspension set-up uses 2 lower links and a single upper link.

    The difficulty with this is upper link clearance from the engine - usually requiring the upper link to be offset. If the offset is not extreme and is on the correct side (which side depends on the angle and counteracting torque roll), this set-up can work well (providing link geometry is acceptable).

    The Safari-guard 3 link has 1 lower link on the centreline and 2 upper links. The main advantage it has is that it is a bolt-on system. The prototype received bad press due to structural failure, which was rectified.

    Although the Safari-guard is a tested system, I would not use it on a tourer.

    An anti-roll/sway bar can fix the body roll issues, but it is the behaviour during crash stops that I have concerns with.

    If designed for good anti-dive characteristics, a 4 link plus panhard front suspension suffers from binding like radius arms, and for the same reason (the system is over constrained). They rely on flex in the bushings when the axle articulates, but having more bushings allows more flex.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bush65 View Post
    If designed for good anti-dive characteristics, a 4 link plus panhard front suspension suffers from binding like radius arms, and for the same reason (the system is over constrained). They rely on flex in the bushings when the axle articulates, but having more bushings allows more flex.
    This has always concerned me. I've lost count of the number of web photos I've seen of 4 links with heim joints everywhere.
    To articulate they're relying on the mounts flexing or the rear axle tube twisting.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Is there any chance of a diagram,photo so the rest of us know what you are taking about?. Pat

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    sunny Hobart
    Posts
    1,293
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Is there any chance of a diagram,photo so the rest of us know what you are taking about?. Pat
    good call Pat, lost me with the 4 link, 3 link, 2 link, heim joints (is that like the leafy type joint ) uppers and downers...oops sorry thats upper and lower links

    can some put that in laymans terms...ta

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Is there any chance of a diagram,photo so the rest of us know what you are taking about?. Pat
    You mean a photo of the 3-link?


  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    You mean a photo of the 3-link?


    or did you want a pic of a MTB??

    cheers phil

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    You mean a photo of the 3-link?


    or did you want a pic of a MTB??

    cheers phil

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Come on Phil, at least post a pic of a Decent bike


    Sorry for the hijack!

    Your provent is in the post.

    Btw - that crappy bike you posted now has me thinking how horrible URT suspension designs are to ride... About as bad as a "one link" (grader ball etc.) suspension on a 4x4 would be.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discowhite View Post
    or did you want a pic of a MTB??

    cheers phil
    That doesn't look like a motor torpedo boat!!!.So what is the advantage of the 3 link setup?.It just looks like over-engineering to me and the lower link would limit axle movement unless it was able to twist with it.I think spherical bushes in the radius arms would be a better thing. Pat

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discowhite View Post
    or did you want a pic of a MTB??

    cheers phil
    You've just posted a bike with the worst suspension design ever.
    Here's a better one.


Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!