Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 65

Thread: Improving fuel efficiency v8i

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Burpengary Qld
    Posts
    71
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by slug_burner View Post
    Toss the V8 and stick in a diesel
    Be a good idea but can't afford to change now.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nsgnomad View Post
    Thanks. I thought they used less than the V8 disco, at least based on figures I have seen from mag test reviews. But yes, none of these vehicles are lightweight. Judging from the other replies the best device for economy is a careful right foot.
    Since when have they been right?.The new V8 T/D cruisers are supposed to get Tdi economy,10ltrs per hundred,try 14 driven very carefully. Pat

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Since when have they been right?.The new V8 T/D cruisers are supposed to get Tdi economy,10ltrs per hundred,try 14 driven very carefully. Pat
    Actually, They are right Pat, 10 litres of diesel, and 4 litres of OIL per 100km

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Windowlickersville WA
    Posts
    3,403
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    Actually, They are right Pat, 10 litres of diesel, and 4 litres of OIL per 100km

    JC
    Providing the oil doesnt disappear when the bottom end falls out as a few have been known to do! Then its 0L diesel and 5L oil/100m!!!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    That isn't going to save fuel. If you've ever seen a BSFC map you'll know why.

    Engines are most efficient with the throttle most of the way open (just before they hit enrichment) with lower rpm.

    Going down a gear raises the rpm (more frictional losses) and results in a bigger pressure drop across the throttle (more pumping losses).

    The best fuel economy is found with the tallest gears your engine can pull. Making sure the auto stays in lockup will help greatly too.
    A little more complex than that with a petrol, depends on how much torque and where, engine vacuum has alot to play in this aswell, labouring an engine becomes inefficient, but revving an engine, when it could do the same work at lower revs is also

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    A little more complex than that with a petrol, depends on how much torque and where, engine vacuum has alot to play in this aswell, labouring an engine becomes inefficient, but revving an engine, when it could do the same work at lower revs is also
    If you can find a BSFC map for these engines then you can pick exactly where's the best point to run it.
    Generalising from the othe petrol BSFC maps I've found, the absolute best point is found at an rpm around 2/3-3/4 of max torque with the pedal almost buried.

    Of course if you don't need that amount of power at your cruising speed, you're best to raise your gearing to drop the rpm. Basically find the power you need and follow that constand power curve across the map until you find the lowest fuel consumption.
    These maps are created from measured results, so they include all the effects of valve timing, spark timing, your engines VE characteristics etc.

    Here's a prius BSFC map:


    Here's an audi W12 BSFC map:


    Opposite ends of the spectrum, but the generalisations still hold.

  7. #17
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    These plots show one reason why diesel engines tend to be more efficient in practice - the specific fuel consumption varies a lot less with rpm and power.

    They also bring into question the oft stated contention that a more powerful engine operating at low power is more economical than a smaller engine operating near maximum power - these diagrams suggest that you need to have an engine sized so that in your most common operating conditions you can use near full throttle at around half maximum rpm, the actual rpm not being all that critical but the near full throttle is.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    These plots show one reason why diesel engines tend to be more efficient in practice - the specific fuel consumption varies a lot less with rpm and power.

    They also bring into question the oft stated contention that a more powerful engine operating at low power is more economical than a smaller engine operating near maximum power - these diagrams suggest that you need to have an engine sized so that in your most common operating conditions you can use near full throttle at around half maximum rpm, the actual rpm not being all that critical but the near full throttle is.

    John
    Dead right, the "big lazy engine" theory is complete bollocks. Smaller engines have less internal friction and less pumping loss. This is why car makers are turning towards smaller boosted engines to reduce fuel economy.

    Here's the BSFC plot for a VW 1.9tdi. One of the most efficient engines you'll find on the road regardless of size.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    That isn't going to save fuel. If you've ever seen a BSFC map you'll know why.

    Engines are most efficient with the throttle most of the way open (just before they hit enrichment) with lower rpm.

    Going down a gear raises the rpm (more frictional losses) and results in a bigger pressure drop across the throttle (more pumping losses).

    The best fuel economy is found with the tallest gears your engine can pull. Making sure the auto stays in lockup will help greatly too.
    I'm talking about not lugging the motor in too high a gear, don't hold your foot flat to the floor and having the motor lugging up a hill, drop back a gear and hold around the same revs, it does save fuel, Regards Frank.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Moruya Heads/Sth. Coast, NSW
    Posts
    6,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nsgnomad View Post
    Thanks for your input. I have to agree with you about using the tallest gear that the engine is comfortable with. Some time ago I observed the computerised instantaneous fuel consumption on an astra I hired. When going uphill, at the same speed, changing down a gear used more fuel than allowing the engine to work in o/d
    Of course it will use more fuel if you keep it floored in a lower gear, the idea is to go back a gear, drop the revs to maintain motion and dont lug the motor, that's what gears are for, Regards Frank.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!