Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Engine Ideas for 82 classic rangie

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,777
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by 2door grover View Post
    Have you thought about a commodore v6 ecotec? i've been thinking about what to do to mine as well. You can pick up engine box and loom for under $500 that would last you a few k's

    V6 ecotec weight about 190 kgs for the engine, when new made 152kw @ 5200 305nm @3600

    Rover 3.5 is about 170 kgs makes about 118kw @5200 and 285nm

    you can buy stroker kits for the v6 now and they last awhile. i have seen these engines make 500 hp(with a bit of work) at the wheels. I cant find a place that makes a kit for them to go into a rangie but i haven't looked to hard yet.
    I picked up an ecotec long motor for $10, perfect low K bottom end just need the efi manifold and a megasquirt ecu. I also have an earlier Buick V6 that will nearly bolt in.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    I picked up an ecotec long motor for $10, perfect low K bottom end just need the efi manifold and a megasquirt ecu. I also have an earlier Buick V6 that will nearly bolt in.
    I don't understand your ability to pick things up at ridiculously cheap prices, but I envy it. Must be right time right place.

  3. #13
    lokka Guest
    Preaty sure marks adaptors did a kit to fit the 3.8 dunny dore engin in a rangie if not it should be a near straight bolt up there both buick style blocks and the 3.8 from the series 1 vn with a modded chip like my bros old VN would be a ball tearer in a rangie and would give good economy

  4. #14
    350RRC's Avatar
    350RRC is offline ForumSage Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    5,502
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Gotta love the youth of today,


    any probs, pre-perceived or otherwise, just clobber it with horsepower. Miss out on the experience.

    DL

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 350RRC View Post
    Gotta love the youth of today,


    any probs, pre-perceived or otherwise, just clobber it with horsepower. Miss out on the experience.

    DL
    Few things are always good in life, Hp just happens to be one of them

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Toowoomba QLD
    Posts
    1,132
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I couldnt live with the torque output of a standard Holden V6 in a heavy 4WD - the peak is way too high up in the rev range for my liking. An auto would probably disguise it however.

    I once ordered a work ute (VS commodore) with a manual box and was very dissapointed with it. The auto ones went heaps better and were a lot more pleasant to drive.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Drouin East, Vic
    Posts
    2,781
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If your motor is tired, as previously mentioned, you will be surprised how much of an improvement a new cam and lifters will bring. I went to a lot of expense a few years back replacing a tired 3.5 with 4.4 P76 plus EFI. When I pulled down the old motor, several lobes of the camshaft were very nearly round. Wish I had just rebuilt it.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melrose SA
    Posts
    2,838
    Total Downloaded
    0
    (Flame Suit on)
    I once spent time with a guy who built Rover V8s for Bathurst and he was of the view that the Rover 3.5 was as good as the 3.9 he said a number of critical things about the 3.9.
    I also learnt that there is little difference between a good 3.5 and a standard 3.9. Something to think about.
    The Yanks were right though nothing beats cubic inches
    Although the 4.0 to 4.6 were always trouble without major funds spent there is nothing like a good 4.5 TVR great if you have a spare 30 K + Australian

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    Maybe a 3.9L, but not much of an upgrade
    I don't know about that - I've never broken so much stuff since upgrading to a 3.9 .
    Scott

  10. #20
    GuyG's Avatar
    GuyG is offline ChatterBox Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,001
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In relation to 3.5's, we have one that was professionally rebuilt, lifted compression, heads modded, torque cam etc that is fitted to a P6 rover that is running the standard twin carbs & 3 speed auto that has 140hp at the rear wheels (obviously a sedan so only 2wd), the same mob did the work to my 3.9 V8 EFI which now has about 170hp at the rear wheels which is roughly what my P76 motor in my old 2 door was getting - at the end of the day I spent a lot less on the P76 as I bought it already rebuilt.

    I'm aware that all dyno figures vary, but these 3 were all on the same dyno. The actual printouts show less than these figures as the emotive force is removed. These are just examples, the mechanic/tuner didn't want to attempt to EFI the P76 motor due to the cost of getting the computer chipped/modded etc correctly setup, also adaptor plates etc.

    Rebuilding the existing engine also means less stuffing around getting mod plates etc as the same engine number is used
    98 Harvey the tractor - 300 tdi Defender Wagon
    84 Alfetta GTV

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!