Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: after market manul front hubs

  1. #11
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,709
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by toey1977 View Post
    the reason i was looking into it is the fact i drive 350 km a week to work (about 70 km a day return trip) so if i could drop my fuel consumption buy converting to part time 4wd i though it could be worth the outlay on the system
    You'd save more money by fitting LPG. I used to drive 120km per day to/from work. I'd never consider a conversion to part-time 4WD.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Windowlickersville WA
    Posts
    3,403
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    So how are you going to save fuel when all the parts that are spinning in Constant 4wd are still spinning in part time 4wd?.The 80 series are changed back to part time because all the running gear is designed for part time,they made them constant to match LR. Pat
    This is true, but in the early fulltime 80 series, if you convert it to part time, you need to run the CDL constantly also otherwise you get no drive anywhere. Its only in the later viscous transfers where you could disconnect the front and still get drive to the rear.

    But as you said, eitherway it will still make everything spin up front as per usual.

    Quite honestly, you will gain nothing by converting to part time plus from what I have heard, the handling changes somewhat also.

  3. #13
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,524
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The improvement will be more theory than practice - everything is still turning. Then there will be the cost and change in handling and possibility of rear diff failure. I would be very surprised if the improvement in economy was as much as 1%. (I doubt if it makes much difference in the Landcruiser either!)

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Manly QLD
    Posts
    1,452
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a Q – why do all the most fuel efficient 4*4 have full time 4wd (merc, bmw vw…) if the front drive train was such a problem why don’t the EU manufactures scrap it? Mmm
    Take the Jeep GC Vs Merc ML in the 2.7 model. Jeep is part time, Merc is full time. Same engine and 5 speed transmission – different tranfercase and diffs. Very close in the weight (10kg diff) but the merc records better fuel figures (just - but better)… It is more aero dynamic BUT I’ve read claims of up to 15 and even 20% fuel improvement by stopping the front diff with these kits – come on!

    For the euro vehicles - these conversions are just good marketing with baseless claims like electronic rust…
    "my (new) car has had Electronic Rust Protection since new and it has no rust" – obviously nothing to do with the fact it is covered with PAINT… if that system works so well they should fit it to the harbour bridge – there’s a cracker of a saving. Oh wait – a good friend of mine who is an Industrial Chemist ran the equations several years ago and is of the professional opinion that electricity cannot stop rust. Galvanic corrosion yes but not rust. Not to mention the 1.5ah of battery drain….

    Oh and don’t start me on the outboard "hydrofoil". A highly respected marine technician recently wrote that when he sees one of these fitted it tells him that either the boat is underpowered, has the wrong prop or is sick/damaged – and the advertising tells the owner that it can all be fixed with $100. If only owners did some testing before and after – yes it may lift faster but top speed is down fuel usage is up and they bite in sharp turns – that’s why the outboard doesn’t’ come from the factory like that…

    Good marketing will sell anything – how much is a Hyclone? Those tablets that go in the tank?

    I’ll just put that soap box away now…
    L322 3.6TDv8 Lux

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Daisy Hill Queensland
    Posts
    469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Why don't you drop out the front tail-shaft (2wd) and maybe the front shafts(FWH) to convert your car to two wheel drive, test it for a week or month and see if you do save any fuel?

    This way, yes you do have a bit of labour involved however, you will see if any fuel saving is worth the cost of the conversion.

    Besides who wants to get out and lock in the hubs to go 4wheeling? I'll leave that for the Jap cars.
    :TakeABow:LAND ROVER

    Don't Follow Me, I'm in a "Land Rover", You WON'T make it.

    aut viam inveniam aut faciam

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    a mate of mine looked in this with his 100 series, it wasn't worth the $$$

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    4510 QLD
    Posts
    264
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by toey1977 View Post
    I have seen in some 4x4 magazines that people are converting there 80 series from full time 4wd to part time 4x4 with a after market front hub lock like the older model cruiser had before they went full time 4x4, this has got me thinking whether it can be done to a RRC as i prefer this style of setup but have always had a thing for the sound of a landy v8 and the ride of a RRC, especially after a short trip in a mates 60 series cruser i couldnt wait to drive home in my RRC. Anyway back on subject has anyone had a play with these setups or know of people who have used them and what are they like
    Good thought, in theory sounds plausible. Maybe Myth Busters have tested this?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I drove my defender in two wheel drive for 3 weeks when I have it dynoed,save fuel,don't think so.Pump your tyres up,tune the engine,keep at 100 that will save fuel. Pat

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Traralgon, victoria
    Posts
    101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    You'd save more money by fitting LPG. I used to drive 120km per day to/from work. I'd never consider a conversion to part-time 4WD.

    already on gas but thanks anyway

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Traralgon, victoria
    Posts
    101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Landy View Post

    thats the web site i was looking at

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!