Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: LT95 T/F ratios Stg1/110/Isuzu

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Sorry Ben

    I read 1:1 + 4.7 diffs making a final drive of 4.7 so I guess you you mean the RRc LT95 ratio of 1.12:1 + 4.7 making 5.26:1 final drive.

    What I'm concerned about is with a low revving engine like the 4BD1T that develops max torque at about 1800RPM and (Def t/f) 4.99:1 final drive it will be well above the torque curve at 3368RPM doing the basic highway speed of 100KPH in 4th and still well above the curve at 2678RPM in 5th

    With the D1 ratio of 1.211 I'd be doing 2893 RPM in 4th and 2300 in 5th, or at least that's what I'm hoping. The other issue is that the Perentie 6X6 with it's wider track, full ROPS cab, double chassis and leaf springs is probably quite a bit heaver than my regular width, dual cab, coil sprung defender.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Sorry Ben

    I read 1:1 + 4.7 diffs making a final drive of 4.7 so I guess you you mean the RRc LT95 ratio of 1.12:1 + 4.7 making 5.26:1 final drive.

    What I'm concerned about is with a low revving engine like the 4BD1T that develops max torque at about 1800RPM and (Def t/f) 4.99:1 final drive it will be well above the torque curve at 3368RPM doing the basic highway speed of 100KPH in 4th and still well above the curve at 2678RPM in 5th

    With the D1 ratio of 1.211 I'd be doing 2893 RPM in 4th and 2300 in 5th, or at least that's what I'm hoping. The other issue is that the Perentie 6X6 with it's wider track, full ROPS cab, double chassis and leaf springs is probably quite a bit heaver than my regular width, dual cab, coil sprung defender.

    Diana
    Perentie 6x6 are 1.113:1 x 4.7 = 5.231:1 in 4th.

    I sense some deja vu here:
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/isuzu-land...-perentie.html

    I guess it all comes down to how heavy you will be and how much towing and/or hill starts you want to do. i.e. I suspect your limiting factor will be the tall 1st gear of landie gearboxes coupled with your tall diff ratios, rather than getting optimal highway revs. With a turbo the torque peak is irrelevant as in 4th or 5th mine will keep pulling hard all the way to the governor.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Perentie 6x6 are 1.113:1 x 4.7 = 5.231:1 in 4th. <Yes maybe, but I'm not using an LT95 so my choices are different - ever seen a V8 90 or a 2.5litre 90 LT230 lying around in this country?>

    I sense some deja vu here:
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/isuzu-land...-perentie.html <Sorry, can't see the bit with the Isuzu LT230 - LT85 ratio?>

    I guess it all comes down to how heavy you will be and how much towing and/or hill starts you want to do. i.e. I suspect your limiting factor will be the tall 1st gear of landie gearboxes coupled with your tall diff ratios, rather than getting optimal highway revs. With a turbo the torque peak is irrelevant as in 4th or 5th mine will keep pulling hard all the way to the governor.
    The reality is that all LT230 have the same low ratio irrespective of the high ratio fitted, so if hi ratio is too tall, then you use low.

    My issue is that the through drive on the middle axle is in a modified Rover style diff and I'm not currently contemplating changing it's ratio, so my compromises will have to be using available LT230 ratios and therefore the Defender 110/130 4.99:1 or Disco 4.29:1 overall ratios are my logical choices.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    The reality is that all LT230 have the same low ratio irrespective of the high ratio fitted.

    My issue is that my through drive on the middle axle is in a Rover style diff and I'm not currently contemplating changing it's ratio, so my comprimises will have to be using available LT230 ratios and therefore the Defender 110/130 4.99:1 or Disco 4.29:1 ratios are my logical choices.
    My point is that with 3.54 diffs and a LR 5-speed box I think you will need a 1.41:1 t-case unless you want to do hill starts in low range when heavily loaded or towing.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    My point is that with 3.54 diffs and a LR 5-speed box I think you will need a 1.41:1 t-case unless you want to do hill starts in low range when heavily loaded or towing.
    And yes, you may be correct, I have two 1.41 ratio LT230 boxes, but would still like to try with the 1.211 ratio box first.

    A bit like you played around with ratios on yours.

    (BTW one reason not mentioned above, is that I want to use one of the 1.41 ratio LT230 boxes behind the Ashcroft short bellhousing R380, on my SIIB.)

    PS - the drop sides on the ICR trayback for this Defender have the same sticker you use for your avatar!

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    depending on what you're putting on the back

    if you've got the 3.5s in the back Id be going the 1.41 tcase

    if you have 4.11 or 4.7s you'll get away with the 1.21 tcase
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    depending on what you're putting on the back

    if you've got the 3.5s in the back Id be going the 1.41 tcase

    if you have 4.11 or 4.7s you'll get away with the 1.21 tcase

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My 110 Australian supplement handbook gives the following-

    3.9 Diesel LT95 0.996:1

    LT85 1.003:1

    V8 Petrol LT95 1.336:1
    LT85 1.410:1

    I have drawn a gear split chart for 3.9 diesels using either gearbox. I will see if they scan and post them.
    URSUSMAJOR

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Rileys Hill
    Posts
    104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a civilian 6x6, which runs 4 speed box. Has been fitted with 3.5 diffs, 31'' tyres. Using the GPS at 100ks it is doing 2,900 rpm & will pull quite well from 1,800 in top. I would not like 1st to be any higher. Hope this helps. Paul

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by powerband View Post
    I have a civilian 6x6, which runs 4 speed box. Has been fitted with 3.5 diffs, 31'' tyres. Using the GPS at 100ks it is doing 2,900 rpm & will pull quite well from 1,800 in top. I would not like 1st to be any higher. Hope this helps. Paul
    Which make Civvy 6X6 and which engine?

    Looking at your figures, I must have a different calculation of tyre circumfrence but it seems your LT95 and 3.54 diffs must have either the Range Rover or 101 LT95 ratio as I get calculations of 2645RPM and 2780RPM for each drivetrain at 100 KPH (9.65% and 4.31% difference).

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!