Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 79

Thread: 4BD1 performance

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bundaberg Qld.
    Posts
    632
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Oh ok, i have confused myself then. Will have a look in the book later and work out what is going on. All I know was it did and i wasn't very pleased with the fella for trying.
    84' 120" ute - 3.9 isuzu.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Killa View Post
    That torque curve is incredibly impressive...I see why everyone has been saying this Isuzu is unbeatable off-road...I want one!!!
    Now take that graph and stretch the torque curve up to the 500Nm line.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wovenrovings View Post
    never explored to top end that much myself as it isn't the best part of the isuzu power curve.
    Petty right, mine gets ringed 1. to get the next gearchange, 2. cause it was half glazed and blue smokey, with blowby, seems to have improved a fair bit after 14,oookays of towing and flogging

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    LT95 or LT85 (5 speed)? LT85 means it had the LT230 T-case, for which 0.996 isn't an available ratio.

    Justin - yep I need to give mine a birthday too
    Read the owners handbook. 0.996:1 is what it says for the Aust. production 3.9 Izuzu with LT85 five speed.

    Mine does 100kmh @ 2000rpm in high fifth, 110 @ 2200, 120 @ 2400, and tops out at 130kmh in high fifth.
    URSUSMAJOR

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    Read the owners handbook. 0.996:1 is what it says for the Aust. production 3.9 Izuzu with LT85 five speed.
    Maybe you should.

    Don't know which handbook you have, but mine (PN TP1107 B ) says:
    On Page 26:

    LT95 0.996:1 LR230T 1.003:1

    Afaik there was no ratio taller than 1.003:1 available for the LT230 anywhere (or LR230 for that matter )
    Last edited by isuzurover; 27th March 2008 at 10:36 PM.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    221
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Maybe you should.

    Don't know which handbook you have, but mine (PN TP1107 says:
    On Page 26:

    LT95 0.996:1 LR230T 1.003:1

    Afaik there was no ratio taller than 1.003:1 available for the LT230 anywhere (or LR230 for that matter )
    Thats funny my handbook(PN TP1107)says on page 26 RUNNING REQUIREMENTS

    Ben what gearbox and ratio does your county have? My listings suggest 1.222:1 Mine ('86) had LT85/230T with 0.996:1 which I changed.
    Jim.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by yt110 View Post
    Thats funny my handbook(PN TP1107)says on page 26 RUNNING REQUIREMENTS

    Ben what gearbox and ratio does your county have? My listings suggest 1.222:1 Mine ('86) had LT85/230T with 0.996:1 which I changed.
    Jim.
    The PN of my handbook is actually TP1107 B - the B didn't show before because I had a ")" next to it.

    My county is an '87 model with LT85/LT230T and 1.003:1 high range. Did you count the teeth on your gear, or are you just going from what is in the handbook. This is the first time I have heard of a 0.996:1 ratio for the LT230, so I strongly suspect it is a misprint (just as they have LR230T instead of LT).

    The LT95 has the high range ratios:
    0.996:1
    1.113:1
    1.174:1
    1.336:1

    The LT230 has:
    1.003:1
    1.192:1
    1.222:1
    1.410:1
    1.667:1

    The interesting thing to note is that NONE of these ratios correspond - so therefore I cannot see how the LT230 could also have a 0.996:1 ratio - but am happy to be proven wrong.

    EDIT - on the subject of misprints in the handbook - on page 27 of mine it says TR230T !!! (everywhere else LR230T)

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    EDIT - on the subject of misprints in the handbook - on page 27 of mine it says TR230T !!! (everywhere else LR230T)
    Shouldn't that be LT230R?

    I have the LT230R in my rangie (taken from a rangie with the TF727 3sp auto). It's the 1.003:1

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It should be LT230. The 'LT' is derived from Leyland Transmission.

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sorry, I was looking at the wrong line. Australian Supplement no. TP1107B on pages 26-27 shows following transfer ratios:-

    3.9D LT95 0.996:1
    3.321:1

    3.9D LR230T 1.003:1
    3.198:1

    V8P LT95 1.336:1
    3.321:1

    LR230T 1.410:1
    3.319:1

    One wonders which direction they worked out the ratio as 1.003 is the repricrocal of 0.996 (1.004-0.997).
    URSUSMAJOR

Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!