Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48

Thread: What are the pros and cons Defender v Puma v Disco3/4

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stellenbosch, Republic of the Western Cape, RSA
    Posts
    662
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Celtoid View Post
    There is a lot of noise about tyre limitations (as in size) yet I haven't actually read a report that says "couldn't get my D4 somewhere because of the tyre size"! Not saying it's not the case....just haven't read it. Tyre availabilty is an issue but surely in time that will improve.
    Indeed, in SA you can only get 1 or 2 AT tyres in that size, and they cost a blaaady fortune - close to R25K for 5 tyres

    However, a while ago the Cape LR Club organised a sand training course in the dunes. Present were 2 Pumas 90, 1 D2 Td5, 1 130 Td5 and 1 brand new D4. Of these vehicles, all had AT tyres except the D4 which had HP tyres. We all deflated to 1 bar except the D4 which could only go down to 1.2.

    Guess which vehicle ran circles around the rest?.... Yep, the D4. It climbed dunes that none of the others could, and there's even a video of it climbing a dune in reverse!

    See [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MDVoG4jChc]YouTube - Magic Carpet Ride[/ame] & [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxMb-vak1Ss]YouTube - I love my 4 wheel drive....mp4[/ame]

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    88
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is allot of good advice here....Only you can make up the right decision for you.....but when you are buying a Defender be it a Puma or any other model you are buying a lifestyle.

    Im not sure what it is like over there where you guys are from but here in South Africa when you see another Defender you wave at them. I can think of no other vehicle brand that does the same. before using my Defender as a daily driver I have different types of waves from people, useually they were flipping the bird....

    Like someone said in an earlier post, "you either buy with your heart or with your head".........I bought with my heart and I took delivery of a 11MY Puma on the 1st of October and I am not sorry at all.

    Good luck with your choice......its half the fun of the end result!

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Qld.
    Posts
    5,901
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Go the Puma!
    2007 Defender 110
    2017 Mercedes Benz C Class. Cabriolet
    1993 BMW R100LT
    2024 Triumph Bonneville T120 Black

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    33
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Celtoid - you make the D4 very tempting. . .

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by P38ace View Post
    What, all at once?
    That's an example of technological failure. !!

    Dare I say it would not have happened with 16's and a better depth of rubber.

    LOL...love to blame it on the technology but I think it was more to do with the driver going "smooth beach, smooth beach ....where the hell did that bloody big hole appear from?".......

    Funnily enough....I drove away from that and didn't bother getting the wheels looked at for weeks as I had nothing more than a slight....bloody annoying vibration.....sacrificial wheels....... The same family that were there with us were back again a few weeks later and had a very similar incident in a troopie....no sacrificial wheels, one broken...and I mean seriously broken, troopie.....

    Maybe they are jinxed!

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stellenbosch, Republic of the Western Cape, RSA
    Posts
    662
    Total Downloaded
    0
    FWIW, both the D4 and Puma rely of a multitude of electronics. All things being equal, you stand the same chances of being stuck in the middle of nowhere due to a faulty sensor.

    however, quality-wise, the Puma is below par and well below the build quality of the D4. So whereas you may get stuck with a broken down Puma, you stand a better chance of the D4 not breaking down.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain HSE 4.6 2000 View Post
    Thanks Celtoid - you make the D4 very tempting. . .
    Thanks Captain HSE 4.6, but you need to buy what works for you.

    When you drive a D4 you'll not believe that its a diesel...it's quiet and it'll blow away any concept of being slow off the mark or in a cruise....it does not drive like a truck. Low down....well no point in even commenting....it's got it covered. Off road...well, i've covered that.

    But....it's shiney and not exactly cheap......

    Same old Q.....buy what you need or want?

    I live in the burbs and would love to have the space for a dedicted 4X4 and would buy another LR product hands down to meet the need for the off-road experience. I often look at places and think....smash those few trees down and off I go.....but...a D4...not likley....the D4 can do it...but that's why you need friends with Prados....LOL.....

    But I don't have the room and can't afford both. But the D4 works for what I do.

    If I owned a new Puma or another Deffer product, I'd feel the same....not big on braking what I've worked very hard for...so don't get me wrong. But if I had the $ to just get amongst it without care.....who knows....

    Cheers Kev.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    121
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Here we don't have a lot of Pumas or D4 in the country, but I have seen a few of them being used in real 4x4...... the Puma is a Defender, so no questions at all..... the D4 is a car with 4x4 option. If you try to use a D4 in real world off road, this is not the car. I have seen 2 D3 in real mud getting stuck where a Grand Cherokee goes like on road. The cause? there were so much wheel spinning the ECU preferred to shut down the locking capability (it was supposed to be a temperature protection).... if you let me choose, I won't go for a different model than the Puma in Land Rover actual line (not even the Range, too much buttons for me; Free is really crap for off road, at least for Colombian off road). What car went for rescue of both Disco? a 67' Series with HP tires..... a really disappointing day for Land Rover dealer... they were their showroom cars.

    This is not the end. At the end of the day, when everybody was ready to go home (it was a track), one of the Disco didn't move.... its engine started but something wrong was happening with his auto transmission.... the car had to be towed.....

    I have heard from a tech of Land Rover official dealer that our diesel have too much sulphure for Disco's TD engine, creating engine malfunctions and making them to only import gasoline V8... don't really know if this is true...

    I know everybody talks about D4 quality, but I have my reserves........ they are not high quality cars, they are really below the average (even when compared with Jeep, a crap-brand in quality terms, Disco lose):

    JDPower.com | Land Rover

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by carlosbeldia View Post
    Here we don't have a lot of Pumas or D4 in the country, but I have seen a few of them being used in real 4x4...... the Puma is a Defender, so no questions at all..... the D4 is a car with 4x4 option. If you try to use a D4 in real world off road, this is not the car. I have seen 2 D3 in real mud getting stuck where a Grand Cherokee goes like on road. The cause? there were so much wheel spinning the ECU preferred to shut down the locking capability (it was supposed to be a temperature protection).... if you let me choose, I won't go for a different model than the Puma in Land Rover actual line (not even the Range, too much buttons for me; Free is really crap for off road, at least for Colombian off road). What car went for rescue of both Disco? a 67' Series with HP tires..... a really disappointing day for Land Rover dealer... they were their showroom cars.

    This is not the end. At the end of the day, when everybody was ready to go home (it was a track), one of the Disco didn't move.... its engine started but something wrong was happening with his auto transmission.... the car had to be towed.....

    I have heard from a tech of Land Rover official dealer that our diesel have too much sulphure for Disco's TD engine, creating engine malfunctions and making them to only import gasoline V8... don't really know if this is true...

    I know everybody talks about D4 quality, but I have my reserves........ they are not high quality cars, they are really below the average (even when compared with Jeep, a crap-brand in quality terms, Disco lose):

    JDPower.com | Land Rover
    Geez, I must have bought the only good one then....cause it's the complete opposite of what you and that report discribe.

    It would be nice if comments and reports were based on facts.....maybe they should consult some actual owners.

    Have a look at the D3/D4/RRS threads....are all these happy owners in fantasy land? Are all the reports about what they've done in their car all made up?

    This is the first one I've owned, which I've had for about a year now and been lot's and lot's of places off-road......and on the quality front, it hasn't stopped going once....even after an accident. Some of the guys on this site have owned several. They must be on drugs to keep buying crap cars then.

    Can they get stuck, broken or bogged.....of course they can.....so can anything.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,972
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Celtoid View Post

    ...There is a lot of noise about tyre limitations (as in size) yet I haven't actually read a report that says "couldn't get my D4 somewhere because of the tyre size"! Not saying it's not the case....just haven't read it. Tyre availabilty is an issue but surely in time that will improve...
    Last years boys w'end was 4 Defenders and a D3 (on 18" rims) from Mt Hotham to Mt Buller the back way. The D3 was phenomenal, until it got 3 simultaneous punctures! 2 were side wall damage from a partially buried concrete slab from a disused DSE gate, but I think 16" tyres would probably have survived the scrape. Luckily it was at the top of the Zeka Spur track and a flat bed truck could come up the Licola - Mt Howitt Rd and carry him out.

    This years boys w'end on the Border Track, and the same car suffers side wall damage from a twig sized root sticking out of he ruts. Then we had to empty the whole car, to access the bolt for lowering the spare tyre. Who wants to be on an expedition or road trip, and have to empty and repack the car for a tyre change!?

    On both trips, all the passengers preferred the D3, it travelled fast and was very stable over all sorts of terrain. Thanks to active rather than passive suspension.

    If you're thinking D3/4, I'd recommend the 2.7 D3 with 17" wheels and a Kaymar wheel carrier with 2 spares.

    If you've only got one kid on the way, the Defender will be fine. I've travelled for 3 weeks on the road with 3 kids (and a wife) in a 300Tdi Defender, and no one felt uncomfortable. Plus for the price of a D3/4 you can get an 'old school' 300Tdi defender totally refurbished and kitted out. The Defender has timeless charm, so it will always look good in photos too.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!