Having owned a Mazda BT 50, I agree in terms of safety and comfort and additional power the Ford is a great package. If however other factors are considered, from my experience and research, the Ford product will not necessarily provide better reliability in terms of engine reliability, computer or sensor issues. There is a good deal of information pointing to the fact that the 3.2 and 2.2 engines have similar issues to the Puma engines, not surprising given that the are all made by Ford. You can get a great Ranger or an average Ranger. Don't scratch the ranger as the paint is thin.
If you are undertaking relatively tame four wheel driving then the Ranger is fine. In harder environments, the limited ground clearance and long overhangs show up the limitations. While I realise this is a limitation of ute style 4x4's (I have owned 4), the BT 50 I owned was the worst of them out of the box. Throw a frontal protection bar on the front and most deeper bog holes will have you reaching for winch or strap as the front end will hang up on the exit if steep or cut up.
You can throw dollars lifting it, but then you can introduce drive line vibration. Lifting a Puma will do the same, but a standard Puma has more standard clearance than most lifted Rangers.
Having owned 2 Pumas, a BT 50 and a Ford Transit work vehicle (just clocked 200,000 km), in terms of engine reliability, purchasing a Ranger won't necessarily make things better. I traded my Mazda back on 2.2 Defender after I realised that the driving I do the high country of Victoria found out the limitations of the vehicle (it was not lifted though).
Obviously the Ford won't have most of the Defender's driveline issues, but then again, if you break something, you probably won't be able to get it mobile again without assistance.
By the time you put new suspension on the Ranger, fit a canopy and tub liner, the cost would be similar to fixing the Puma's drive line issues.
I have major sympathy for anyone experiencing vehicle reliability problems and you do get to the point where anything is better than what you have got, especially when that vehicle needs to be reliable, either for work or remote touring. Once the trust is gone, it is all over.
The Ranger is a great vehicle, but off road, I'll keep my Defender.![]()


Reply With Quote


On the good side even if I have to walk we are going to Melrose, although that will make it awkward to bring a trailer!!

) but in reality I would not enjoy myself in the seat of someone else's car and I'm a crappy passenger (ask anyone I work with, a lot of people in my town hate "coming for a ride" with me
)

Bookmarks