The LRA "gesture of goodwill" statement has at least 2 purposes, an explanation for doing the repair without admitting liability, and to make you feel good about the deal so you don't follow up. Replacing the motor at no cost to you is the minimum obligation for LRA. So be clear in your mind about that. Even without the statutory warranty, they are under a contractual obligation to warranty the product given it's only got 72,000km.
Some might say you'd be unlucky to have another failure. Given the history I'd say you'd be lucky not to have one. I'm betting you don't feel too lucky and have no confidence in the vehicle.
As I indicated earlier you haven't had a full opportunity to test other failure points others have experienced.
Going well these are a great machine. When they're a lemon they are an expensive liability that's not fit for purpose let alone if you only used it as a car on the black top. You will find plenty of JLR promotional vids on YouTube to illustrate what they market the vehicle as.
Given LRAs obtuse attitude I'd push very hard for a refund, as the lack of written acknowledgement indicates they will fight hard to resist any other warranty assistance.
At the end of a big push they might give you another 3 years which is the minimum in reassurance.
LRA and JLR are experiencing tremendous brand strength but still have a nagging unreliability reputation, which is raised by most vehicle reviewers. You should use the risk of reinforcing this nagging reputation in your push.
Just my 2c worth.


 
						
					 
					
					 
				 
             
				
				
				
					 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
						
					 ) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc.
) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc. 
						
					

 
						
					
 
						
					 Originally Posted by Homestar
 Originally Posted by Homestar
					

 
				 )
  )  
						
					 
						
					
Bookmarks