deleted double post
deleted double post
Well said. And completely fits the facts that most of the forum punters here will have already observed in multiple threads - that your personal expectations won't be met by the thus far undefined "new Defender".
I sure don't "need" to be told again of how disappointed you expect to be by the new Defender, nor of your doubts that there will even be a new Defender. I got it already. I also accept that while I don't "need" to be told again - you have a right to share your opinion again, and again, and again... even outside of the threads you created for that purpose. I just don't enjoy it.
I do, however, enjoy a good chin wag with the lads tho - those who have a bit more of a positive outlook, likely born of an understanding that there are a few more than just one way to skin the proverbial moggie. (More than one way to build a new Defender - some perhaps that just might hit a sweet spot in some hearts). That's a conversation I enjoy.
Neil
(Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
Nulla tenaci invia est via
I think the reasons I put forward earlier in this thread are far more likely.
1. The new GBP 1 billion production facility in Slovakia won't be online until 2018 at the earliest. I have no doubt at all that the next Defender will be Slovakian to keep a lid on cost.
2. Prioritisation: getting the high margin vehicles right first from the Range Rover and Discovery pillars of the brand. The new Jaguar F-Pace would have also been given a lot of attention in recent years. JLR has finite resources, after all.
3. The DC100 concept was a disaster and required a ground-up rethink.
JLR is in a stronger position today than it ever has been. It finally has the resources and expertise to create a worthy replacement to the Fender we all love. I think there's good reasons for many of us to feel optimistic about the future of the Defender.
On the topic:
- We know that modern design rules (safety and antipollution) will have to be incorporated.
- Many have suggested that it'd be nice to have disco levels of comfort.
- Many suggest it must remain quite utilitarian.
- of course it has to be the best 4x4xfar as well. Above and beyond.
My thinking is that the above 4 bullet points don't need to be mutually exclusive.
For example:
- Comfortable ergonomic seats and seating position can still be easy clean and hard wearing
- none of the above require footwells and shag pile carpets
- working HVAC and audible ICE don't require compromised off-road ability and can be spec'd for different price points (or even omitted entirely for poverty pack models)
Face it - there are plenty of modern vehicles (delivery vans, even heavy haul trucks) that deliver on safety and pollution standards as well as driver/passenger comforts. Complete with rubber floor mats and ability to bolt on accessories.
Within the parameters defined in the first 4 bullet points above there is plenty of scope for an innovative manufacturer to churn out something awesome for a specific design purpose.
LR have published their 3 Pillars philosophy and that includes a purpose statement for Defender design. They have executed well the stated 3 Pillar purpose outlined for the other two pillars.
Neil
(Really shouldn't be a...) Grumpy old fart!
MY2013 2.2l TDCi Dual Cab Ute
Nulla tenaci invia est via
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks